⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

4 opinions for “Reynolds v. Heidle”

Reynolds v. Statepublic domain
Ohio Supreme Court · 1984-12-12 · Published · cited 186× · 14 Ohio St. 3d 68; 471 N.E.2d 776; 14 Ohio B. 506; 1984 Ohio LEXIS 1245
Clifford F. Brown, J. The reasons for incarcerating a convicted felon are multiple, such as rehabilitation and punishment. It is unquestioned that one of the reasons felons are incarcerated is for the protection of society. R.C. 2967.26 is a statute designed to give greater flexibility to Ohio’s prison system in the attempt to help rehabilitate prisoners. The statute does not, however, ignore the other reasons prisoners are set a
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001-11-08 · Published · cited 59× · 272 F.3d 769; 51 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 641; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 24056
272 F.3d 769 (6th Cir. 2001) Ralph Moore, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.City of Harriman; Harriman Police Department; Roy Jenkins, Chief of Police, Harriman Police Department; Darren McBroom; Terry Fink; Randy Heidle; Virgil McCart; Jerry Singleton, Defendants-Appellees. No. 99-5258 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Argued: December 6, 2000Decided
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001-11-08 · Published · cited 192× · 272 F.3d 769; 2001 WL 1388860
SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge, dissenting. The majority opinion purports to “reaffirm Wells’s requirement that § 1983 plaintiffs must clearly notify any defendants of their intent to seek individual liability, and [to] clarify that reviewing the course of proceedings is the most appropriate way to determine whether such notice has been given and received, as demonstrated by our decisions in Pelfrey and
State v. Santiagopublic domain
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2015-08-25 · Published · cited 0×
****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ‘‘o