Cases

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * SCOTT M. MATHESON, JR., Circuit Judge. Lonnie Glen Hodges appeals from the district court’s judgment affirming the Commissioner’s decision to deny social security disability and supplemental security income benefits. Exercising jurisd

Opinion ALDRICH, J. INTRODUCTION While transporting in his car about one pound of marijuana from one medical marijuana establishment to a second, defendant and appellant William Frank Colvin was stopped and arrested. He was charged with, among other things, transporting marijuana. At his court trial, Colvin raised a defense under the Medical Marijuana Program Act (MMPA), which provides a

MEMORANDUM OPINION SHARON LOVELACE BLACKBURN, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Sarah Lindsey brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits [DIB]. Upon review of the record, the parties’ submissions, and the relevant law, the c

MEMORANDUM & ORDER Nathaniel M. Gorton, United States District Judge Plaintiff Dolly Foxworth (“Foxworth” or “plaintiff’) seeks judicial review, of the denial of her application for disability benefits by defendant, Carolyn W. Colvin (“the Commissioner” or “defendant”), in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“SSA”). Before the Court are plaintiffs motion to rev

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN A. ROSS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This is an action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s final decision denying Keith Stamper’s (“Stamper”) application for supplemental security income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. For the reasons stated herein, the Court will reverse the

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NOELLE C. COLLINS, United States Magistrate Judge. This is an action under Title 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial' review of the final decision of the Commissioner denying the application of Christine J. White (Plaintiff) for Supplemental Security Income (SSI), under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381 et seq. Plaintiff has filed a brief in support

DECISION AND ORDER REVERSING DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER AND AWARDING BENEFITS C.N. CLEVERT, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Richard Phillips appeals the denial of his application for Supplemental Security Income disability insurance benefits (DIB). The road to this point has been a long one. Phillips filed for DIB on February 8, 2002. An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) conducted a hearing on July 7, 2005,

Matter of Colvin v Venettozzi (2020 NY Slip Op 05114) Matter of Colvin v Venettozzi 2020 NY Slip Op 05114 Decided on September 24, 2020 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bure

ORDER JAMES G. CARR, Senior District Judge. This is a Social Security case in which the plaintiff, Tyrone Brock Jr., appeals the Commissioner’s decision denying his application for benefits. An administrative law judge found Brock suffered from two “severe impairments: postoperative degenerative disc disease with spinal stenosis and disc herniation, lumbar spine.” (Doc. 10 at 91). Neverthe

ORDER LAWRENCE L. PIERSOL, District Judge. This Court referred the case to United States Magistrate for the purpose of issuing a Report and Recommendation. The Magistrate Judge has recommended that the Commissioner’s denial -of benefits be reversed and remanded for reconsideration pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), sentence four. A sentence four remand is proper when the district court 'mak

MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD D. BENNETT, District Judge. Plaintiff Toni Works (“Works” or “Plaintiff’) brings this action against Defendant United States Social Security Administration (“SSA” or “Defendant”), alleging employment discrimination under the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 701 et seq. Specifically, Plaintiff asserts claims of (1) disability discrimination; (2) failure to accomm

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NOELLE C. COLLINS, United States Magistrate Judge. This is an action under Title 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner denying the application of Dale Frank (Plaintiff) for Disability Insurance Benefits (DIB) under Title II of the Social Security Act (the Act), 42 U.S.C. §§ 401 et seq., and for Supplemental Security Income

Donald C. Coggins, Jr., United States District Judge Plaintiff has brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") denying her claim for Disability Insurance Benefits. In accordance with

DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Marc Lesterhuis (“Plaintiff’) brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking review of the final decision of Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”), denying Plaintiffs application for disability insurance benefits. (Dkt. 1). Plaintiff alleges that the d

*714 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DAVID L. BUNNING, District Judge. Plaintiff brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to obtain judicial review of an administrative decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. The Court, having reviewed the record, will affirm the Commissioner’s decision, as it is supported by substantial evi

ORDER TIMOTHY C. BATTEN, SR., District Judge. This Title VII case is before the Court on the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation on Acting Commissioner Carolyn Colvin’s partial motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies [20] and the Commissioner’s objections to the R & R. I. Background Adrienne Bloodworth wor

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE TERRY I. ADELMAN, United States Magistrate Judge. This cause is on appeal from an adverse ruling of the Social Security Administration. The suit involves Applications for Disability Insurance Benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act and for Supplemental Security Income under Title XVI of the Act. Claimant has filed a Brief in S

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-1624 TRISHA K. REYNOLDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States Dist

[1] Does an individual who does business as a sole proprietor under one or several names remain one person, personally liable for all his obligations? [2] Jury returned verdict in conversion action against defendant-appellant, R.A. Coker, d/b/a Sherwood Motors, for $1,625 actual damages and $17,500 punitive. Defendant appeals, contending that trial court erred in overruling his demurrer to plaintiff's evidence. [3] Plaintiff's action was premised on defendant's wrongful

STEWART, Judge. Plaintiffs, Eugene Reynolds and Eugenia E. Reynolds, obtained a consent judgment against the National Society of Health for nonpayment of amounts due under a health insurance policy. The Reynolds then obtained a judgment of garnishment against the Commissioner of Insurance for the State of Louisiana shortly before the Commissioner instituted liquidation proceedings against the National Society of Health. The Co