Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Reynaldo Charles, Jr.”
United States v. Reynaldo Pineda-Duartepublic domain
CHAD A. READLER, Circuit Judge. Suppose an individual approached by a police officer for a suspected drug offense swings a shovel at the officer-but misses. Has the individual "used violence," thereby triggering the sentencing enhancement in U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(2) of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines? While the district court did apply the § 2D1.1(b)(2) enhancement,
Reynaldo Reyes v. Netdepositpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT McKEE, Chief Judge. Reynaldo Reyes appeals the District Court’s denial of his motion to certify a class to sue for alleged civil violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962(c), (d). The defendants are Zions First National Bank (“Zions Bank”) and its payment-processor subsidiaries,
United States v. Charles Krausepublic domain
SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge. A jury found Charles Maxwell Krause guilty of one count of damaging property of the United States valued at more than $1,000 after a drunk-driving incident in which Krause struck and destroyed a localizer antenna array at a Lakeville, Minnesota area airport. The district court 1 sente
Charles Reynaldo Murillo v. State of Floridapublic domain
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 5D2024-3455 LT Case No. 2016-CF-003385-A _____________________________ CHARLES REYNALDO MURILLO, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ 3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County. Peter M. Brigham, Judge. Rachael E. Reese, of Rachael
Reynaldo Gonzalez v. Google LLCpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT REYNALDO GONZALEZ; THE No. 18-16700 ESTATE OF NOHEMI GONZALEZ; BEATRIZ GONZALEZ, Individually D.C. No. and as Administrator of the Estate 4:16-cv-03282- of Nohemi Gonzalez; JOSE DMR HERNANDEZ; REY GONZALEZ; PAUL GONZALEZ, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GOOGLE LLC, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the Unit
Reynaldo Gonzalez v. Google LLCpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT REYNALDO GONZALEZ; THE No. 18-16700 ESTATE OF NOHEMI GONZALEZ; BEATRIZ GONZALEZ, Individually D.C. No. and as Administrator of the Estate 4:16-cv-03282- of Nohemi Gonzalez; JOSE DMR HERNANDEZ; REY GONZALEZ; PAUL GONZALEZ, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GOOGLE LLC, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the Unit
25 F.3d 1051NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Charles HAMBERLIN and Reynaldo Payne, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 93-3881, 93-3988 and 93-3883.
United States v. Abaripublic domain
638 F.3d 847 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Anthony Akeum ABARI, Appellant. No. 10-2447. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted: February 18, 2011. Filed: April 14, 2011. *848 Reynaldo A. Aligada, Jr., AFPD, argued, Minneapolis, MN, for appellant. Charles John Kovats, Jr.,
EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge: Defendants, Amy Ralston Pofahl (“Po-fahl”), Charles T. Nunn (“Nunn”), and Randy White (“White”), were jointly tried before a jury and convicted of offenses stemming from a conspiracy to import into the *1463 United States and distribute 3,4-methylene-dioxymethamphe
SKELTON, Senior Judge. On March 12, 1980, the defendants, Jose Renaldo Villamonte-Marquez and Robert Sortgese Hamparian, were indicted on four counts involving approximately 5800 pounds of marijuana, a Schedule I Controlled Substance. They were charged in Count I with conspiracy to import marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 963, i
State v. Hernandezpublic domain
SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge. The state appeals from an order suppressing marijuana found in the appellees’ residence. Upon an acceptable view of the record, the court concluded that the contraband had been unconstitutionally discovered and then seized only when, without cognizable “exigent circumstances,” cf. State v. Riggs, 890 So.2d 465 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)(warrantless entry justified by founded concern for safety of o
United States v. Charles O. Kallestadpublic domain
236 F.3d 225 (5th Cir. 2000) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.CHARLES O. KALLESTAD, Defendant-Appellant. No. 98-51089 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, FIFTH CIRCUIT December 19, 2000 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas Befor
Lopez v. Hardingpublic domain
68 S.W.3d 78 (2001) Reynaldo LOPEZ, Appellant, v. Charles HARDING, Individually and d/b/a C & C Trucking, Alliance Trucking, Inc., and Charles Will Martin, Individually and d/b/a Martin Excavation, Appellees. No. 05-99-02101-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas. May 30, 2001. *79 Lauren Beck, Kenneth R. Breitbeil, McFall, Gl
Rodriguez v. City of Aurorapublic domain
887 F.Supp. 162 (1995) Reynaldo RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF AURORA, an Illinois Municipal Corporation, and the Board of Trustees of the City of Aurora Police Pension Fund, Defendants. No. 94 C 5578. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. January 17, 1995. Bruce Allen Brown, Goldsmith, Thelin, Dickson & Brown, Margaret Anne Gisch, Aur
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Alvin Harrispublic domain
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 1, 2022. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-21-00690-CV UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant V. ALVIN HARRIS; JD HARRISON; CASSAUNDRA HENRY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF CARRIE GANT (DECEASED); ARCHIE MAE HEWITT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE JOE WILL
United States v. Charles Leslie Harrellpublic domain
REYNALDO G. GARZA, Circuit Judge: Appellant, Charles Leslie Harrell, appeals his convictions of modifying and selling descramblers modules for the purpose of decrypting satellite transmissions in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2512(l)(b) and 47 U.S.C. § 605(e)(4). Upon review, we find both statutes were correctly applied and we therefore AFFIRM. FACTS
Gonzales v. Statepublic domain
809 S.W.2d 778 (1991) Reynaldo G. GONZALES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. A14-90-0496-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist). May 2, 1991. *779 Lawrence R. Scroggins, Caldwell, for appellant. Charles J. Sebesta, Jr., Caldwell, Larry Urquhart, Brenham, for appellee. Before J. CURTISS BRO
Brown v. Millerpublic domain
928 F.2d 395 Brown (William Waddell, Jr.)v.Miller (Charles), Belcher (Robert), 'Davis', Corea(Paulette), Adams (Theo), Sparks (Fred), Collins(Montreal), 'Rick', Butler (Fred),Garcia (Reynaldo), Summers (LaGuardia), Bryant (Joe) NO. 90-1349 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. FEB 28, 1991
Barros v. Statepublic domain
661 S.W.2d 337 (1983) Charles BARROS, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 13-82-350 CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi. November 23, 1983. *339 Jon R. Wood, Brownsville, for appellant. Reynaldo S. Cantu, Jr., Brownsville, for appellee. Before PAUL W. NYE, C.J., and YOUNG and KENNEDY, JJ. </
Burma Navigation Corp. v. Reliant Seahorse MVpublic domain
DeMOSS, Circuit Judge: In this case, two vessels were unable to successfully navigate the Mississippi River and avoid colliding with one another in the process. The district court found the M/V ALASKA and the M/V RELIANT SEAHORSE to be equally at fault in causing the collision and assessed liability 50% against each ship. After a complete review of the record, we find that suffici