Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Reyes-Rios v. Haynes”
United States v. Galiciapublic domain
Case: 20-40200 Document: 00515687007 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/28/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 28, 2020
Shakur v. Wardenpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COCHISE AMARI SHAKUR, : : Petitioner : : Civil Action No.: 22-1669 (RC) v. : : Re Document No.: 12 WARDEN,
United States v. Miguel Nietopublic domain
EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises out of the convictions and sentences of four defendants, Miguel Nieto, Ramon Morales, Carlos Hernandez, and Santos Almanza. The indictment charged three counts: (1) racketeering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”); (2) conspiracy to racketeer in violation of 18 U.S
Tesla v. Louisiana Automobile Dealerspublic domain
Case: 23-30480 Document: 161-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/26/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED August 26, 2024 No. 23-30480
Nicolas Rios, Jr. v. Statepublic domain
NO. 07-05-0041-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C AUGUST 25, 2006 ______________________________ NICOLAS RIOS, JR., APPELLANT V. TH
Nicolas Rios, Jr. v. Statepublic domain
NO. 07-05-0041-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C AUGUST 25, 2006 ______________________________ NICOLAS RIOS, JR., APPELLANT
Nicolas Rios, Jr. v. Statepublic domain
NO. 07-05-0041-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C AUGUST 25, 2006 ______________________________ NICOLAS RIOS, JR., APPELLANT <
United States v. Sandovalpublic domain
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before TANG, LAWRENCE, and STEPHENS, Appellate Military Judges _________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Gilbert SANDOVAL Boatswain’s Mate First Class (E-6), U.S. Navy
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo ________________________ No. 07-21-00240-CV ________________________ TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF STATE HEALTH SERVICES, APPELLANT V.
OPINION Opinion by: PATRICIA O. ALVAREZ, Justice. This case stems from a dispute over the effects of the termination of an oil, gas, and mineral lease and a joint operating agreement (JOA). The lease in question, the Baker Lease, is located in McMullen County. The Baker Trusts, represented by Bank of America, and the Rutherfords1 are lessors of the Baker Lease
Montalvo v. Statepublic domain
OPINION MICHAEL MASSENGALE, Justice. Appellant Guillermo Montalvo has been charged with murder (trial court cause number 1237568). See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 19.02 (Vernon 2003). His pretrial bail was originally set at $50,000, and he filed a habeas corpus petition (trial court cause number 1242494) complaining that the bail was excessive and seeking a reduction of the bail to $5,000. See
United States v. Campos-Ayalapublic domain
Case: 21-50642 Document: 189-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/07/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit FILED No. 21-50642 June 7, 2024
State v. Chrystul D. Kizerpublic domain
2022 WI 58 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2020AP192-CR COMPLETE TITLE: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Chrystul D. Kizer, Defendant-Appellant. REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS
State v. Chrystul D. Kizerpublic domain
2022 WI 58 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2020AP192-CR COMPLETE TITLE: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Chrystul D. Kizer, Defendant-Appellant. REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS
Guillermo Montalvo v. Statepublic domain
Opinion issued April 29, 2010 In The Court of Appeals For The
United States v. Jose Escalante-Reyespublic domain
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge, dissenting, joined by EDITH H. JONES, Chief Judge, and EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge, and joined as to parts LA, I.B, and I.D by EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge: I respectfully dissent. For the first time ever, this court reverses a below-guideline sentence for alleged unfairness. And for at least the 181st time, it reverses a case on plain error, despite the Supreme C
Commonwealth v. McNultypublic domain
458 Mass. 305 (2010) COMMONWEALTH v. JEROME McNULTY. No. SJC-09669. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Essex. May 7, 2010. November 18, 2010. Present: MARSHALL, C.J., COWIN, CORDY, BOTSFORD, & GANTS, JJ. *306 Sharon Fray-Witzer for the defendant. Kenneth E. Steinfield, Assist
Loya v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.public domain
669 F.Supp.2d 1266 (2009) Anita LOYA, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P., Defendant. No. CIV 08-0278 RB/CEG. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. July 27, 2009. *1271 Jeffrey A. Dahl, Keleher & McLeod, P.A., Albuquerque, NM, for Plaintiff. Bryan C. Garcia, Henry F. Narvaez, Narvaez Law Firm, P.A., Albuque
Hyundai Motor Co. v. Alvaradopublic domain
OPINION PHIL HARDBERGER, Chief Justice. This product liability suit against an automobile manufacturer, Hyundai,2 resulted in a jury verdict of $18 million. The suit was premised on the failure of a seatbelt to restrain Mario Alvarado (“Mario”), an occupant of a vehicle during an automobile accident. As a result of the injuries he sustained in the accident, Mario is permanently para
United States v. Jose Escalante-Reyespublic domain
REVISED AUGUST 13, 2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 11-40632 July