Cases

629 N.W.2d 586 (2001) 2001 SD 71 FARM & CITY INSURANCE, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ESTATE OF Tasha DAVIS, Defendant and Appellant. No. 21644. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Argued February 13, 2001. Decided June 6, 2001. Paul S. Swedlund of Gunderson, Palmer, Goodsell & Nelson, Rapid City, SD, Attorneys for plaintiff

165 S.E.2d 553 (1969) 3 N.C. App. 536 James Percy DAVIS et al. v. Rexford DAVIS and Ronnie Davis, minors, without general or testamentary guardian in this State; Wachovia Bank & Trust Company, Executor of the Estate of Elizabeth Barnes Miller, Deceased, and The Primitive Baptist Church of Orlando, Florida; Myrtle Davis and Dorothy Davis. No. 688SC321. Court of Appeals of Nor

PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The order sought to be reviewed in the petition for writ of certiorari is not appropriately brought in a certiorari proceeding nor is the order a final or an appealable nonfinal order. WOLF, C.J., DAVIS and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Filed 3/11/21 Certified for Publication 4/9/21 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE TRAMON WILSON-DAVIS, B306781 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 19STCV08579) v. SSP AMERICA, INC. et al.,

CONNOR, J\, after stating the case(: It is well settled by uniform decisions that the motion for removal is to be decided upon the pleadings and record as they are when the petition is filed. Does the complaint disclose a removable cause of action? Tobacco Co. v. Tobacco Co., 144 N. C., 352, and cases cited. The only question, therefore, open to us is, whether the plaintiff has in his complaint stated a cause of action agai

Skoglund, J. ¶ 1. Taxpayer, Brownington Center Church of Brownington, Vermont, now known as New Hope Bible Church and Ministries, Inc. (the Church), appeals the Superior Court, Civil Division’s determination that certain land and buildings owned by the Church are not exempt from real estate taxes for the tax year commencing April 1, 2009 under 32 V.S.A. § 3832(2). We affirm. ¶ 2. In 1997, a Vermont farmer esta

BROWN, J., dissenting. Plaintiff alleges that on 10 December, 1903, the defendant J. H. Tucker was, and for a long time prior thereto had been, a duly licensed attorney at law, residing and practicing his said profession at Asheville, N.C.; that on the beforementioned date the defendants C. H. Rexford and W. A. Rexford were capitalists, trading and (419) seeking investments in mineral and timber lands in North Carolina and other States, as the plaintiff is informed and believes; that on a

MEMORANDUM ORDER PER CURIAM. Plaintiff, Donald Rexford Smith, a native of West Virginia and a recent graduate of a North Carolina law school, commenced this action against the State Board of Law Examiners of West Virginia for declaratory and injunctive relief following the Board’s refusal to certify him as an applicant entitled to be licensed to practice law in the courts of West Virginia. He asks that

Charles Austin and Esther J. Austin v. Douglas Rexford Rankin and Elizabeth Ann Rankin IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

708 So.2d 1121 (1998) STATE of Louisiana v. Eric C. DAVIS. No. 97-KA-850. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. February 11, 1998. Byrne W. Dyer, III, Gretna, for Appellant. Paul D. Connick, Jr., District Attorney, Norma Broussard, Ellen S. Fantaci, Assistant District Attorney, Gretna, for Appellee. Before GAUDIN, CANNELLA and DALEY, JJ.

MEMORANDUM DECISION ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS DAVID M. COHEN, United States Magistrate Judge. The plaintiff in this action alleging violations of the Maine Human Rights Act, 5 M.R.S.A. § 4551 et seq.; Title VII of the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; and the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., move

966 F.Supp. 911 (1997) LINCOLN BENEFIT LIFE COMPANY, a Nebraska Domestic Insurance Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Robert R. EDWARDS, Defendant. No. 4:CV95-3098. United States District Court, D. Nebraska. March 24, 1997. *912 Gary J. Nedved, Keating, O'Gara, Davis & Nedved, P.C., Lincoln, NE, for plaintiff. Rexford H. Carut

536 A.2d 557 (1987) Darryl DRIVER v. Hazel DRIVER. No. 85-014. Supreme Court of Vermont. November 13, 1987. *558 Rexford & Kilmartin, Newport, for plaintiff-appellant. Robert W. Davis, of Chimileski & Associates, P.C., Newport, for defendant-appellee. Before ALLEN, C.J., and PECK, GIBSON, DOOLEY and MAHADY,

ORDER PER CURIAM. Defendant appeals from a summary judgment entered against him on a personal guaranty of the note of a limited partnership executed by him to plaintiff. No error of law appears. No precedential value would be served by an opinion. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum in support of this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

PER CURIAM: James Shelby appeals from the entry of summary judgment against him in his civil rights lawsuit. We affirm. The material facts are not in dispute. Shelby pled guilty to a State of Mississippi narcotics charge in early 1976. He was sentenced to twenty years incarceration, ten years suspended, t

373 A.2d 521 (1977) David CURRIER d/b/a Currier Real Estate and Joanne M. Day v. Philip LETOURNEAU and Barbara Letourneau. No. 265-75. Supreme Court of Vermont. April 5, 1977. *523 Rexford, Kilmartin & Chimileski, Newport, for plaintiffs. May & Davies, Barton, for defendants. Before BARNEY, C. J., and DALEY,

PRESTON, J. {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Marlon D. Frye ("Frye"), appeals the July 11, 2017 judgment entry of sentence of the Allen County Court of Common Pleas. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. {¶ 2} On December 15, 2016, the Allen County Grand Jury indicted Frye on three counts, including: Count One of having weapons while under disability in violation of R.C

438 A.2d 375 (1981) Heloise H. DAVIS v. DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY. No. 445-79. Supreme Court of Vermont. October 16, 1981. *377 Rexford, Kilmartin, Chimileski & White, Newport, for appellant. William T. Keefe, Montpelier, for appellee. Before BARNEY, C. J., and LARROW, BILLINGS, HILL and UNDERWOOD, JJ.</

Grant, C. J. (after stating the facts). I think the instruction was correct. He is bound by his settlements. He knew that Ballin did not settle with or pay him. The settlements and receipts were binding upon him, and bar recovery. He kept silent when he should have spoken. The law estops him to speak afterwards. No better illustration of the wisdom of this rule can be found. For five years plaintiff claimed he was entitl

MEMORANDUM** Jose Luis Contreras appeals his 18-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for attempting to transport an undocumented alien without presentation to an immigration officer, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(iii). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Contreras contends that the district court erred in denying a two leve