Cases

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0114p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ RESURRECTION SCHOOL; CHRISTOPHER MIANECKI, │ in

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0191p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ RESURRECTION SCHOOL; CHRISTOPHER MIANECKI, │ individually and

DECISION AND ORDER WILLIAM M. SKRETNY, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Six Plaintiffs commenced this putative collective/class action on May 22, 2008, claiming that Defendants, a health care network and certain of its officers and member entities, violated the: Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), New York Labor Law (“NYLL”), Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), Racketeering I

ORDER XAVIER RODRIGUEZ, District Judge. On this day the Court considered Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 26), Plaintiffs’ Response (Docket No. 29), and Defendant’s Reply (Docket No. 31). For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s motion is GRANTED. I. Background A. Factual Background C.M.P. is a former student of Seguin I

[J-82-2016] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT SAYLOR, C.J., BAER, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ. WILLIAM PENN SCHOOL DISTRICT; : No. 46 MAP 2015 PANTHER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT; : THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF : Appeal from the Order of the LANCASTER; GREATER JOHNSTOWN : Commonwealth Court entered on April SCHOOL DISTRICT; WILKES-BARRE : 21

975 So.2d 698 (2008) John JOHNSON, et al. v. ORLEANS PARISH SCHOOL BOARD, et al. No. 2006-CA-1223. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. January 30, 2008. Rehearing Denied February 27, 2008. *702 Linda S. Harang, Law Offices of Linda S. Harang, L.L.C., Jefferson, Louisiana, and Suzette Bagneris, Bagneris

Sosman, J. Plaintiff Lorraine Richards has brought the present action alleging sexual harassment, race and sex discrimination, and retaliation against her employer (Walter Fernald State School) and her supervisor (John Bruk). In her amended complaint, she added a claim for “aiding and abetting” (G.L.c. 15IB, §4(5)), a claim for violation of her civil rights (G.L.c. 12, §111), and common-law claims for intentional interference wi

OPINION WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge: Ida Maxwell “Maxie” Wells, who was a secretary at the Democratic National Committee (DNC) for a short time in 1972, filed a defamation action against G. Gordon Liddy stemming from his advocation of an alternative theory explaining the purpose of the June 17, 1972, Watergate break-in. During several public appearances and

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2025-0079 _____________________________ NANCY ESTES, Appellant, v. PALM BEACH COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, and DAVIES CLAIMS NORTH AMERICA, INC., Appellees. _____________________________ On appeal from the Office of the Judges of Compensation Claims. Gregory J. Johnsen, Judge of Compensation Cl

JUSTICE McNULTY delivered the opinion of the court: In this case we must decide whether rolling stock used occasionally in interstate commerce qualifies for exemption from the use tax. See 35 ILCS 105/1 et seq. (West 1992). The Department of Revenue (the Department) denied the exemption National School Bus Service sought, an

299 F.Supp.2d 1340 (2004) THE THOMAS COUNTY BRANCH OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, Shernika Holton, Gladys Shotwell, Spencer Wilson, Sandra McIntyre, Mary Hill, Willie Mae Lewis, Jennifer Hightower, Evelyn Wilkerson, Sharon Bostick, Audrey Linder, and Lisa Webb, Plaintiffs v. CITY OF THOMASVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant No. 6:98-CV-63 (CDL). United States District C

RÍLEY, J., PLEADINGS AND ISSUES Plaintiffs aver in a complaint filed in equity, that they are adult taxpayers within the Coatesville area School District in this county and allege the suit to be brought on behalf of themselves and all other taxpayers. Defendants are the school district and the tax *567collectors of the several townships situate with

269 F.3d 305 (4th Cir. 2001) TERRY BELK; DWAYNE COLLINS, on behalf of themselves and the class they represent, Plaintiffs-Appellants,WILLIAM CAPACCHIONE, Individually and on behalf of Christina Capacchione, a minor; MICHAEL P. GRANT; RICHARD EASTERLING; LAWRENCE GAUVREAU; KAREN BENTLEY; CHARLES THOMPSON; SCOTT C. WILLARD, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.THE CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG BOARDOF EDUCATION; ERIC SMITH, Superintendent, in his official capa

Mr. Justice Brennan, concurring. Almost a century and a half ago, John Marshall, in M’Culloch v. Maryland, enjoined: “. . . we must never forget, that it is a constitution we are expounding.” 4 Wheat. 316, 407. The Court’s historic duty to expound the' meaning of the Constitution has encountered few issues more intricate or more demanding than that of the relationship betwe

Opinion by Mr. Justice Pomeroy, The appeals now before us are from the decision of the Commonwealth Court in Philadelphia School District v. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission, 6 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 281, 294 A. 2d 410 (1972) in which that court affirmed orders issued by the Commission to five school districts (Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Uniontown, New Castle and New Kensington-Arnold) upon a findi

J. FRITZ GORDON, Circuit Judge. Opinion, April 15,1961: These are two cases which have been consolidated for the purpose of trial of the issues, the issues being somewhat similar in their allegations and the prayers for relief. The gist of the allegations in both complaints follows — That under Florida law children are required to attend school. Section 231.01, Florida Statutes —

BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge. Stanley A. Samad appeals the decision of the district court granting summary judgment to defendants Donald M. Jenkins, individually and in his capacity as Dean of the School of Law, University of Akron, the University of Akron, School of Law, and John Does I and II. Plaintiff argues on appeal that the district court erred in granting the defend

[Cite as State v. Polizzi, 2024-Ohio-142.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NOS. 2020-L-016 2020-L-017 Plaintiff-Appellee, Criminal Appeals from the -v-

BARRON, Circuit Judge. This appeal concerns three claims that a New Hampshire State Prison ("NHSP") inmate brought against two of the prison's officers in a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging violations of his federal constitutional rights. The inmate a

Appellate Case: 20-1230 Document: 010110769600 Date Filed: 11/15/2022 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT November 15, 2022 _______