⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

3 opinions for “Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute v. Amazon.com, Inc.”

District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014-01-08 · Published · cited 1× · 983 F. Supp. 2d 713; 2014 WL 464839; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14984
OPINION AND ORDER MARK S. DAVIS, District Judge. This matter is currently before the Court on a motion for summary judgment filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively “Samsung” or “Defendants”). ECF No. 134. The motion has been fully briefed and is therefore ripe for decision. After exa
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015-06-23 · Published · cited 21× · 790 F.3d 1329; 115 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1357; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 10535; 2015 WL 3852932
REYNA, Circuit Judge. This case returns to us on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States and was returned to the panel for reconsideration in light of Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., 574 U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 831, — L.Ed.2d — *1334 (2015). Appellant Univ
In Re GOOGLE LLCpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020-02-13 · Published · cited 75× · 949 F.3d 1338
Case: 19-126 Document: 36 Page: 1 Filed: 02/13/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE: GOOGLE LLC, Petitioner ______________________ 2019-126 ______________________ On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Nos. 2:18-cv-00462-JRG, 2:1