Cases

Hamilton, Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant Renee Perillo pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit kidnapping in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1201 (c), and to commissioning a murder for hire in violation of

216 P.3d 547 (2009) STATE of Alaska, Petitioner, v. David G. HAMILTON, Respondent. No. A-10268. Court of Appeals of Alaska. September 18, 2009. *548 David L. Brower, Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Division Central Office, and Richard Svobodny, Acting Attorney General, Juneau, for the Petitioner. Jane E. Sebens, Assis

BARRON, Circuit Judge, concurring. *63I join in full our opinion affirming the District Court's dismissal of Maine Pooled Disability Trust's ("MPDT") claim that "no statute imposes a transfer of assets penalty for transfers to an exempt pooled special needs trust such as the MPDT." I think it important to emphasize, though, one point that our

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Petition for writ of cer-tiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Bank of America, N.A. v. Caulkett, 575 U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 1995, 192 L.E.2d 52 (2015).

24 So.3d 946 (2009) James and Renee HAMILTON, Individually and on Behalf of their Minor Daughter, Kirstyn Hamilton v. Travis WILLIS d/b/a Team FMX, Scooter Promotions, L.L.C., ABC Insurance Company and SMG, Inc. d/b/a Louisiana Superdome. No. 2009-CA-0370. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. November 4, 2009. Michelle D. Robert, Jennifer G. Ahner, Law Offi

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: J.L. appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. J.L. v. Mitchell, No. 1:16-cv-00583-GBL-JFA, 2016 WL 4582052 (E.D. Va. Sept. 1,

The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Dollar. Upon review of the competent evidence of record, and finding no good grounds to receive further evidence or rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission, upon reconsideration of the evidence, affirms the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner with minor modifications. ***********

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17–3436 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RENEE S. PERILLO, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 720 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 721 A liability insurer agrees to defend its insured against a personal injury lawsuit. After the insurer refuses a settlemen

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17–3436 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RENEE S. PERILLO, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

642 F.Supp.2d 1001 (2009) MONSTER CABLE PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiff, v. EUROFLEX S.R.L., et al., Defendants. No. C 08-3338 PJH. United States District Court, N.D. California. July 10, 2009. *1005 Christopher James Passarelli, Robert W. Payne, Lariviere, Grubman & Payne, LLP, Monterey, CA, for Plaintiff. L. Michael Rudolp

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 20-3048, 21-1110 RENEE LANGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF OCONTO and CITY OF OCONTO FALLS, Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-19-00082-CV ___________________________ TEODORO PEREZ, Appellant V. DINA RENEE JOHNSON, Appellee On Appeal from the 96th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 096-288801-16 Before Sudderth, C.J.; Gabriel and Kerr, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

05/07/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 1, 2018 RENEE ANN BRADLEY V. RICHARD BRADLEY Appeal from the General Sessions Court for Morgan County No. 15-DV-19 Michael A. Davis, Judge No. E2017-01626-COA-R3-CV A husband

655 F.Supp.2d 473 (2009) BONNIEVIEW HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, LLC; Juan F. and Rafael Hernandez; Rene N. and Stephen J. Hrop; Renee K. Goodlow and Michael R. Berry; Yuangen Zhu and Qi Liu; G. Thomas and Sharon Perrone; San Chee and George Lee; Parhat and Sema Yasar; Fazal and Sanyakhan Bari; James and Diane Sadowski; Daniel and Pauline Roh; Louise Ann and Bruce Dostal; Joseph and Bobbi Intile; Yi Lu and Bruce Tang; and Keith Hamilton, Plaintiffs, v.

DENNIS JACOBS, Chief Judge: Irving Picard (“Picard” or the “Trustee”) sues in his capacity as Trustee under the Securities Investor Protection Act (“SIPA”) on behalf of victims in the multi-billion-dollar Ponzi scheme worked by Bernard Madoff. The four actions presently before this Court allege that numerous major financial institutions aided and abetted the fraud, collecting

332 F.Supp.2d 1 (2003) UNITED STATES of America ex rel., ERVIN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., Plaintiff, v. The HAMILTON SECURITIES GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants. Nos. CIV.A.96-CV1258(LFO), CIV.A.99-CV1698(LFO). United States District Court, District of Columbia. May 1, 2003. *2 Aaron L. Handleman, Eccleston & Wolf, Joseph P. Hornya

BRITTANY AND JAMAR * NO. 2020-CA-0324 WAITERS * VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL * RENEE E. DEVILLE FOURTH CIRCUIT * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* CONSOLIDATED WITH: CONSOLIDATED WITH: BRI

MILLER, District Judge. Renee S. Majors, a long-time employee at General Electric Company’s Blooming-ton, Indiana plant, filed suit alleging that GE violated the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., when it denied her temporary and permanent po

OPINION CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., P.J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which D. MICHAEL SWINEY and JOHN W. McCLARTY, JJ., joined. This is one of three cases consolidated for oral argument. In each case, the following happened: (1) the borrower defaulted on his or her home loan and the lender foreclosed by non-judicial action, a procedure authorized