Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Renee Curtis-Carey”
FILED Apr 08 2020, 11:43 am OPINION ON REHEARING CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals
People v. McKaypublic domain
664 N.E.2d 222 (1996) 279 Ill. App.3d 195 215 Ill.Dec. 825 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfred McKAY, a/k/a Howard Beecham, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-93-2836. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Second Division. March 29, 1996. Rehearing Denied April 30, 1996. <
Cooper v. Statepublic domain
739 So.2d 82 (1999) Albert COOPER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 86,133. Supreme Court of Florida. July 8, 1999. Rehearing Denied September 13, 1999. *83 Scott W. Sakin, Special Assistant Public Defender, Miami, Florida, for Appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Randall Su
Alexander v. Hillpublic domain
625 F.Supp. 567 (1985) Clara ALEXANDER; Carmen Nelson; Etter Hilton and Sarah Williams, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; and Henry J. Conner, Plaintiffs, v. Renee HILL, Director, Division of Social Services, North Carolina State Department of Human Resources; James F. Richardson, Mecklenburg County Board of Social Services; and Edwin H. Chapin, Director, Mecklenburg County Department of Social Services, Defendants.
United States v. Warnagirispublic domain
Appendix A Department of Justice Chart Documenting Sentences in Capitol Breach Cases Monday, January 6, 2025 SENTENCES IMPOSED IN CASES ARISING OUT OF THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6, 2021 Disclaimer: Those relying on information contained in this document should verify all information for accuracy Table 1: Cases in which the government recommended a probation sentence without home detention 1 0F Defendant Ca
Jones v. Celotex Corp.public domain
ROBERT F. COLLINS, District Judge. Defendants, Celotex Corporation (Celo-tex) and Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (Aetna), have moved the Court for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial in the *556above captioned case. For the following reasons, that motion is GRANTED. Facts This
In Re Trasylol Products Liability Litigationpublic domain
709 F.Supp.2d 1323 (2010) In re TRASYLOL PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL-1928. This Document Relates To: All Actions. Case No. 08-MD-01928. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. April 27, 2010. *1324 Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt Johnson Osborne & LeClainche, John Scarola, Brenda S. Fulmer, Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart &am;
IN RE: Administrative Suspension Pursuant to Rule 219 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcementpublic domain
NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. The current license status of a Pennsylvania attorney can be found on the Disciplinary Board’s website. https://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/for-the- public/find-attorney Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Attorneys Certified for Administrative Suspensi
Morris v. Krauszer's Food Stores, Inc.public domain
The opinion of the court was delivered by HUMPHREYS, J.A.D. Aileen Morris, a mother of nine children, was shot to death by a robber in 1989 while working as a clerk at a Krauszer’s convenience store. The store was owned by defendant Convenience Management Services, Inc. (“CMSI”) and operated by Dairy Stores. The jury returned a verdict against CMSI. CMSI appeals, contending: (1) it had
In re Suspensions of Att'yspublic domain
Cite as 2015 Ark. 200 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSIONS OF Opinion Delivered May 7, 2015 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM On May 14, 2014, we held unconstitutional former Rule VII(C) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar to the extent the former rule provided for the suspension of attorneys
People v. Fairpublic domain
636 N.E.2d 455 (1994) 159 Ill.2d 51 201 Ill.Dec. 23 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. Robert FAIR, Appellant. No. 71231. Supreme Court of Illinois. March 24, 1994. Rehearing Denied May 27, 1994. *461 Rita A. Fry, Public Defender, Chicago (Jeffrey M.
State of Tennessee v. Jason Curtis Johnsonpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 25, 2005 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JASON CURTIS JOHNSON Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Wilson County No. 02-0928 J. O. Bond, Judge No. M2003-03060-CCA-R3-CD - Filed February 17, 2006 Following a jury trial, Defendant, Jason Curtis Johnson, was convicted of on
Felder v. Fosterpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT David O. Boehm, J. This motion for attorney’s fees is brought by the plaintiffs pursuant to section 1988 of title 42 of the United States Code following an action prosecuted under the Civil Rights Act of 1871 (US Code, tit 42, § 1983). Section 1988, known as the Civil Rights Attorney’s Fees Awards Act of 1976, provides that a court may award a reasonable attorney’s fee to a party who h
City of Dallas, Texas v. Arredondo, Anthonypublic domain
Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM
City of Dallas, Texas v. Willis, Kevin Michaelpublic domain
Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM
People v. Robinsonpublic domain
91 Ill. App.3d 1138 (1980) 415 N.E.2d 585 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. VIRGIL ROBINSON, a/k/a Cody Robinson, Defendant-Appellant. No. 79-1487. Illinois Appellate Court First District (5th Division). Opinion filed December 19, 1980. *1139 Elliot Samuels, of Chicago, for appe
In Re Toyota Motor Corp.public domain
785 F.Supp.2d 883 (2011) In re TOYOTA MOTOR CORP. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation. This Document Relates To: All Foreign Plaintiffs' Economic Loss Cases. Case No. 8:10ML 02151 JVS (FMOx). United States District Court, C.D. California. April 8, 2011. *888 Andrea Bierstein, Clinton
South Carolina National Bank v. Stonepublic domain
*328ORDER JOSEPH F. ANDERSON, Jr., District Judge. This matter is now before the court on the Plaintiffs’ motion to certify a plaintiff class.1 A hearing on this motion was held on this and numerous other motions before the Honorable Matthew Perry on July 19-20, 1989. On October 12, 1989, before Judge Perry ruled on the cl
Caballero v. Anselmopublic domain
720 F.Supp. 1088 (1989) Rosa Maria CABALLERO, Plaintiff, v. Reynold V. ANSELMO, Julian M. Kaufman, Defendants. No. 85 Civ. 2386 (IBC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 7, 1989. *1089 Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle, New York City, for plaintiff, Joseph F. Kelly, Jr., of counsel. Lowenthal, La
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court