Cases

584 N.W.2d 425 (1998) Rena M. LOSOYA, n/k/a Saldivar, Respondent, Ramsey County, Respondent, v. Jason RICHARDSON, Appellant. No. C6-98-491. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. September 29, 1998. *426 Susan Gaertner, Ramsey County Attorney, Steven R. Pfaffe, Assistant Ramsey County Attorney, St. Paul, for respondent Ramsey County.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER HARRY D. LEINENWEBER, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court are Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint. (The Court denies Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss the first Complaint, Dkt. #s 12 and 14, as moot.) For the reasons stated herein, the Court grants in part and denies in part the Hillside Defendants’ Motions

234 F.Supp.2d 981 (2002) WEBSTER INDUSTRIES, INC., a Minnesota Corporation; Kretz Lumber Co., Inc., a Wisconsin Corporation; Woodline Manufacturing, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation; Wycombe Wood Products, Inc., a Wisconsin Corporation; and Hart Tie & Lumber, Inc., a Wisconsin Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. NORTHWOOD DOORS, INC., an Iowa Corporation; Partridge River Superior, Inc., a Wisconsin Corporation; Partridge River, Inc., a Minnesota Corpora

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-24-00053-CR NO. 09-24-00054-CR __________________ WHITNEY ROY COBURN, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appe

4 A.3d 288 (2010) 298 Conn. 495 Rena Sobol ACKERMAN et al. v. SOBOL FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, LLP, et al. Alfred Casella et al. v. Ruth Sobol et al. Tamar Ackerman et al. v. Bank of America et al. In re Rena Sobol Ackerman Trust. TZVI Rakoszynski et al. v. Bank of America et al. Nos. 18288, 18289. Supreme Court of Connecticut. <

Syllabus by the Court 1. The admission at trial of the transcript of a guilty plea of an accomplice was proper under the Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rules of Evidence, and Confrontation Clause where there was substantial evidence of its trustworthiness. 2. Trial court did not err in refusing to instruct the jury on the lesser-included offense of second-degree murder where the evidence of intent would not provide a rational basis for an acquittal on th

583 N.W.2d 825 (1998) 1998 N.D.App. 9 Renae L. MONSON, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Ronald L. MONSON, Defendant and Appellant. Civil No. 980006CA. Court of Appeals of North Dakota. September 15, 1998. *826 Patti Jo Jensen, of Lindquist, Jeffrey & Jensen, East Grand Forks, MN, for plaintiff and appellee.<

THOMPSON, Judge. In this appeal, plaintiff contends the trial court erred by (1) denying its motion for summary judgment, (2) denying its motions for directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict, (3) excluding certain exhibits of the plaintiff and admitting certain exhibits of defendants, and (4) failing to instruct the jury according to plaintiff’s request. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm.

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas OPINION No. 04-17-00046-CV XTO ENERGY, INC. and Mobil Producing Texas and New Mexico, Inc., Appellants v. EOG RESOURCES, INC. and Reilly McNeel Dillon, et al.,

PRESIDING JUSTICE BARRY delivered the opinion of the court: Respondent Lyndell Edwin Duff appeals from judgment of the circuit court of Tazewell County denying Lyndell’s motion to vacate or reconsider an order entered by the court on September 21, 1990, granting temporary custody of the parties’ two minor children to petitioner Rena Lee Duff, now Rena Lee Catton. The court al

OPINION CORNELIUS, Chief Justice. The plaintiffs Susan Renae Miles, individually and as next friend of minors Willie Sear-cy and Jermaine Searcy, and Kenneth Miles sued Ford Motor Company and Douglas' Stanley, Jr., doing business as Doug Stanley Ford, to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by Willie Searcy as a result of a two-car collision that occurred in Dallas County. The plaintiffs asserted

967 S.W.2d 377 (1998) FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Susan Renae MILES, individually and a/n/f of Willie Searcy and Jermaine Searcy, minors, and Kenneth Miles, Respondents. No. 96-0545. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued November 21, 1996. Decided March 19, 1998. Rehearing Overruled June 23, 1998. *378<

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge: The question presented is whether to issue a writ of mandamus to resolve in favor of the defendants this long-lived litigation under the Alien Tort Statute (“ATS”) — a statute, passed in 1789, that was rediscovered and revitalized by the courts in recent decades to permit aliens to sue for alleged serious violations of human rights occurring abro

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS, AT AUSTIN NO. 3-93-161-CR ANDREW RICHARDS, JR., APPELLANT vs.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SARIS, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In this proposed nationwide class action, plaintiffs, consumers and third-party payors (“TPPs”) who paid for a prescription for the drug Neurontin, allege that defendants Warner-Lambert and Pfizer (“defendants”), the manufacturers and distributors of Neurontin, systematically and knowingly engaged in a frau

842 So.2d 1 (2002) Paul E. GARDNER and Celia H. Gardner v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY et al. 2000279. Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama. January 18, 2002. *2 Frank M. Wilson, Montgomery; and Lynn W. Jinks III and Christina D. Crow of Jinks, Daniel, Crow & Seaborn, L.L.C., Union Springs, for appellants.

BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge: This tax fraud appeal turns on a fairly routine, straight-forward and simple issue, sufficiency of the evidence; but, it is complicated greatly by the Government's failure to carry the day on its global theory for conviction, by the concomitant difficulty of instead reviewing its proof on a count-by-count basis, and by the incomplete state of the record

128 S.E.2d 818 (1963) 258 N.C. 439 INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY v. Manley JACOBS and wife, Geneva Jacobs. No. 603. Supreme Court of North Carolina. January 11, 1963. *819 Clark, Clark & Grady, Elizabethtown, for plaintiff-appellant. Hester & Hester, Elizabethtown, and J. B. Eure, Whiteville,

Catterson, J. (concurring). I concur with the majority that the question of same-sex unions is the province of the Legislature rather than the Judiciary. The issue presents no opportunity for the development of the common law in New York but nonetheless it poses significant constitutional questions. I write separately to amplify this constitutional dimension. Cardozo observed that:

776 F.Supp.2d 240 (2011) Larry Randall POWELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The DALLAS MORNING NEWS L.P., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:06-CV-1960-BF. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. March 28, 2011. *244 Howard C. Rubin, Lisa Catherine Tulk, Kessler Collins, Karen G. Shropshire, Greer & Shropshir