Cases

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MICHAEL G. WILLIAMSON, Bankruptcy Judge. Sections 523(a)(5) and (15) of the Bankruptcy Code except from discharge domestic support obligations and other obligations owed to spouses, former spouses, and children of a debtor that arise pursuant to a divorce or separation settlement *456

347 F.Supp.2d 222 (2004) UNITED STATES of America v. Ernest REINHARDT, et al. Defendants. No. CR. L-02-0307. United States District Court, D. Maryland. December 13, 2004. *223 Arcangelo M. Tuminelli, Law Office of Archangelo M. Tuminelli, William S. Little, Stark and Little, Baltimore, MD, Michael D. Montemarano, Michael D. Monte

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-1257V Filed: April 2, 2021 ************************* * * GLENN REINHARDT, * * * TO BE PUBLISHED Petitioner, *

Ct. App. La., 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.

Ct. App. La., 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.

Dismissed in part; affirmed in part by published opinion. Judge GREGORY wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Judge MICHAEL concurred. OPINION GREGORY, Circuit Judge: Byron Allen and Ernest Reinhardt (“Appellants”) appeal, on various grounds, their convictions for wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (2000). Additionally, R

970 F.2d 901 U.S.v.Reinhardt (David) NO. 92-5019 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. June 25, 1992 1 Appeal From: D.N.J. 2 AFFIRMED.

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff George L. Reinhardt appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(b)(2) and (d) for his persistent failure to comply with discovery orders of the district court. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and the record of prior proceedings, which we reference only as necessary to explain our decision to affirm. Rule 37 grants district courts “broad power” t

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KYLE REINHARDT, Plaintiff, Vv. Civil Action No. 22-1237 (CKK) GUIDEHOUSE INC., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (Sept. 9, 2025) Pending before this Court is Defendant Guidehouse Inc.’s [30] Refiled Motion to Stay and to Compel Arbitration (““Guidehouse Mot.”); Defendant Kim Cirka’s [31] Refiled Motion to Stay and Compel Arbitration (“Cirka Mot.”); and Plaintiff Kyle Reinhardt’s [32] Refiled Consolidated Statement of Points and A

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA22-744 Filed 02 May 2023 Catawba County, No. 21CVS937 ESTATE OF RODNEY BAKER, Plaintiff, v. DAVID W. REINHARDT and RANDY REINHARDT, Defendants. Appeal by Defendant Randy Reinhardt from an order entered 14 July 2022 by Judge Alan Z. Thornburg in Catawba County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 7 March 2023. Patrick, Harp

ORDER FORRESTER, District Judge. This action is before the court on plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment. By this motion plaintiff seeks summary judgment as to defendant’s third, seventh, eighth, ninth, tenth, eleventh, thirteenth, and fourteenth defenses. Defendant has conceded that summary judgment is appropriate as to its tenth, eleventh, and fourteenth defenses, which assert the doctrines of l

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE STATE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS WILLIAM J. MARTÍNEZ, United States District Judge This action, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, relates to the state of Colorado’s treatment of persons convicted of sex crimes. Plaintiffs, who are inmates, parolees, and probationers of the Colorado Department of Corrections (“CDOC”) and their family members (collectively

MEMORANDUM ** Deandre Derrick Meighan appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 100-month concurrent sentences imposed following his guilty-plea convictions for conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance and distribution of a controlled substance, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C), and 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87

ORDER The opinion filed on June 12, 2017, United States v. Gorman, 859 F.3d 706 (9th Cir. 2017), is hereby amended to include Case Number 15-16694, the caption of which was inadvertently omitted from our original opinion.