Cases

DECISION AND ORDER WILLIAM M. SKRETNY, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Barbara E. Salamon, M.D., commenced this action on January 21,1999 against Defendants Our Lady of Victory Hospital (“OLV” or “the Hospital”) and five medical personnel associated therewith — Dr. Michael C. Moore, Dr. Franklin Zeplowitz, Dr. John F. Reilly, Dr. Albert J. Diaz-Ordaz, and John P. Davanzo (collec

514 F.3d 217 (2008) Dr. Barbara E. SALAMON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OUR LADY OF VICTORY HOSPITAL, Michael C. Moore, M.D., Franklin Zeplowitz, M.D., John F. Reilly, M.D., Albert J. Diaz-Ordaz, M.D. and John Defendant', Mallon Axidrou. P. Davanzo, Defendants-Appellees. Docket No. 06-1707-cv. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: August 2, 2007.

06-1707-cv Salamon v. Our Lady of Victory Hospital AMENDED OPINION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ________________ August Term, 2006 (Argued: August 2, 2007 Decided: January 16, 2008

ORDER MARY S. SCRIVEN, District Judge. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of Defendant George J. Foxx’s Opposition to Notice of Removal by Ocwen and Deutsche Bank, which this Court construes as a motion to remand, (Dkt. 5) and the Response in opposition thereto filed by Third-Party Defendant, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC (“Ocwen”), and Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Deutsche Bank

OPINION Under California law, the statute of limitations for attorney malpractice claims arising from a given matter is tolled for the duration of the attorney's representation of the client in that matter. (Code Civ. Proc., § 340.6, subd. (a)(2).) When an attorney leaves a firm and takes a client with him or her, does the tolling in ongoing matters continue for claims against the former firm and partners? We conclude it does not and

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JEFFREY GOWER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2020-0996-PAF ) TRUX, INC., VIKING VENTURE ) PARTNERS, LLC, MICHAEL ) SACCONE, SR., MICHAEL ) SACCONE, JR., MICHAEL ) WHO

PER CURIAM: Plaintiff Anthony Knight, an African-American electrician, sued Defendant State University of New York at Stony Brook (“Stony Brook”) for discrimination and retaliation, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights - Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.,. when it ■ terminated Knight’s employment after he reported racist graffiti in a bathroom located at his worksite. At trial, the parties disputed (amo

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE BLACK DIAMOND HOPE HOUSE, INC. : K15C-12-034 JJC & DIANNE BINGHAM, PRESIDENT, : In and For Kent County : Plaintiffs, : v. : : U & I INVESTMENTS, LLC and USMAN : SANDHU, : : Defendants,

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Salvador Collazo, J.), entered July 25, 1997, which denied plaintiffs motion to deem the summons and complaint served on defendant Noori by service upon his relative Deborah Noori on January 15,1997 to have been filed as of January 17, 1996, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Plaintiff concedes that she did not purchase a second index number and did not effect service within 120 days as required by

17‐54‐cv Knight v. State Univ. of N.Y. at Stony Brook UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT __________________ August Term, 2017 (Argued: December 15, 2017 Decided: January 29, 2018)

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE POST HOLDINGS, INC. and ) MICHAEL FOODS OF DELAWARE, ) INC., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2017-0772-AGB ) NPE SELLER REP LLC, SAFE EGG ) LLC, THE MARVIN AND DONNA ) AARDEMA FAMILY

Jill A. Otake, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff David E. Henry, M.D. ("Plaintiff") asserts claims for violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5 et seq., against Defendant Castle Medical Center, dba Adventist Health Castle1 ("Defendant").2 Compl., ECF No. 1. Plaint

19-1094 Felder v. USTA 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 4 August Term 2020 5 6 (Argued: January 27, 2021 Decided: March 7, 2022) 7 8 No. 19-1094 9 10 –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– 11 12 SEAN G. FELDER 13 14

LABARGA, J. This case is before the Court for review of the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Chemrock Corporation v. Tampa Electric Co., 23 So.3d 759 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). The district court certified that its decision is in direct conflict with the decisions of the Second District Court of Appeal in Pagan v. Facilicorp, Inc., 989 So.2d 21 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008), and Edwards v. City of St. Pe

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 108,333 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. ADAM J. LONGORIA, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. A constitutional claim that pretrial public

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

05/22/2017 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 21, 2017 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MELVIN KING Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 104304 Steven Wayne Sword, Judge ___________________________________

DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Saurín Popat, M.D. (“Plaintiff’) brings various claims arising out of his employment against five defendants: (1) Elad Levy, M.D. (“Dr. Levy”); (2) The State University of New York at Buffalo (the “University”); (3) University at Buffalo School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences (“Medical Scho

GROSS, J. We reverse an order of dismissal because there was sufficient record activity under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e) to avoid dismissal. In February 2008, Weston TC LLLP filed suit against CNDP Marketing, Inc. and Helen C. Schur Parris for breach of a lease. The defendants answered and counterclaimed. Between February and October 2008, the parties engaged in discovery and other litigation

PRESCOTT, J. The defendant, Daniel W., appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of six counts of risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21 (a) (2) ; five counts of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-70 (a) (2) ; one count of attempt to commit sexual assault in the first degree in violation of