Cases

Opinion issued June 27, 2019 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00596-CR ——————————— REGINALD WASHINGTON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appell

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-KA-00596-COA REGINALD MARTE’Z FOX A/K/A REGINALD APPELLANT MARTEZ FOX v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/26/2021 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. MICHAEL M. TAYLOR COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: LINCOLN COUNTY CIRCUIT

Opinion issued August 13, 2019 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00596-CR ——————————— REGINALD WASHINGTON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appe

17,LW * t %> av Cause No. 58,097 THE STATE OF TEXAS § IN THE 1B1ST District Court US. § In And For Reginald Connon § Potter County, Texas OEff^l Defendant

State of New York MEMORANDUM Court of Appeals This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 84 SSM 17 The People &c., Respondent, v. Reginald Blandford, Appellant. Submitted by Peter D. Salton, for appellant. Submitted by William D. Vandelinder, for respondent.

USCA11 Case: 19-10332 Document: 302-1 Date Filed: 12/02/2024 Page: 1 of 142 19-10332 Opinion of the Court 1 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 19-10332 _______

COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. Reginald Morgan was acquitted of criminal charges in Missouri state court by reason of insanity and committed to the custody of Missouri’s Director of Mental Health. In 2008, he petitioned the district court for a writ of habeas corpus in an effort to gain release from the state mental institution. The district court dismissed the petition on the ground th

OPINION Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice An ex-husband appeals from a final divorce decree arguing (1) the trial court abused its discretion in dividing the community estate and (2) the evidence conclusively established that spousal maintenance should not be awarded to his ex-wife. We modify the decree to delete the s

ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J. (concurring). ¶ 56 I agree with the court of appeals that "[w]ithout question, *551the law did not clearly provide that Sanders could not be prosecuted for criminal sexual acts he was alleged to have committed prior to age ten." State v. Sanders,

OPINION OF THE COURT FISHER, Circuit Judge. Reginald Sanders appeals from the final order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We will affirm. I. We write exclusively for the parties, who are familiar with the factual context and legal history of this case. Therefore, we will set

OPINION OF THE COURT FISHER, Circuit Judge. Reginald Sanders appeals from the final order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We will affirm. I. We write exclusively for the parties, who are familiar with the factual context and legal history of this case. Therefore, we will set

965 N.E.2d 1275 (2012) 358 Ill. Dec. 796 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dontrell SANDERS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-10-2040. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Second Division. Filed February 14, 2012. As Modified upon denial of rehearing March 20, 2012. *1

ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court People v. Sanders, 2012 IL App (1st) 102040 Appellate Court THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Caption DONTRELL SANDERS, Defendant-Appellant. District & No. First District, Second Division Docket No. 1-10-2040 Filed February 14, 2012 Re

HEDRICK, Judge. The record before us discloses the following chronology of events: Judgment in this case was entered on 22 May 1976 and notice of appeal was given in open court at that time. Defendants were allowed 50 days within which to “serve case on appeal.” On 22 July 1976 defendants obtained an order extending the time to serve the record on appeal to 1 September 1976. On 20 August 1976 defen

FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE #038 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinion handed down on the 3rd day of September, 2025 is as follows: BY Crain, J.: 2024-CC-00543 MONROE MUNICIPAL FIRE AND POLICE CIVIL SERVICE BOARD VS. REGINALD BROWN AND THE CITY OF MONROE (Parish of Ouachita) AFFIRMED. SEE OPINION. Jus

OPINION ON REHEARING Terry Jennings, Justice Appellees, Krista G. Handyside, M.D., Samuel J. Prater, M.D., Kenneth A. Totz, D.O., FACEP,1 and Memorial Hermann Hospital System, doing business as Memorial Hermann — Texas Medical Center (“Memorial Hermann”),2 have filed motions for rehearing and motions for en banc reconsideration of our April 23, 2015 o

584 S.E.2d 676 (2003) 262 Ga. App. 63 BARRETT v. SANDERS. No. A03A0397. Court of Appeals of Georgia. June 30, 2003. Certiorari Denied October 20, 2003. *677 Rolesia D. Butler, Atlanta, for appellant. *678 Fain, Major, Wiley & Brennan, Thomas

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON September 1, 2015 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JEROME SANDERS Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 1104849 Lee V. Coffee, Judge No. W2014-01513-CCA-R3-CD - Filed December 23, 2015 _____________________________ Defendant, Jerome Sanders, was indicted for first

¶31 (dissenting) — The majority denies Darrell Gregory Jones’s and Reginald Thomas’s right to have a “jury find the existence of ‘any particular fact’ that the law makes essential to [their] punishment,” United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 232, 125 S. Ct. 738, 160 L. Ed. 2d 621 (2005) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 301-02, 124 S. Ct. 2531, 159 L. Ed. 2d 403 (2004)), as the Sixth Amendme