Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.

973 A.2d 734 (2009) REEVES v. U.S. No. 08-CM-313. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. June 2, 2009. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

PER CURIAM: A jury found appellant guilty of armed assault on Hector Maldonado and Juan Reyes with the intent to rob each of them; assault on David Ramos with a dangerous weapon; three counts of possessing a firearm during commission of a violent or dangerous crime (PFCV) (i.e., the three armed assaults listed above); and related weapons offenses. The convictions arose from appellant’s actions in a Chinese carry-out r

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

537 U.S. 1177 REEVESv.UNITED STATES. No. 02-8076. Supreme Court of United States. January 27, 2003. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. 2 C

OPINION HORN, Judge. FINDINGS OF FACT Since late 1995, plaintiffs Robert G. Reeves, James W. Reeves, and Ross E. Brannian have operated 3R Minerals as a partnership in mineral exploration and development. 3R Minerals’ primary interest is in its mining claims and leases in Garfield County, Utah. Plaintiffs are before this court claiming that defendant improperly denied the plaintiffs th

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

537 U.S. 965 REEVESv.UNITED STATES. No. 02-6291. Supreme Court of United States. October 15, 2002. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. 2 C. A

OPINION YOCK, Senior Judge. This is a military pay case in which the plaintiff alleges that he was wrongfully denied consideration and, by inference, promotion to the rank of colonel in the United States Army Reserve (USAR). The plaintiff claims that the Army improperly failed to forward his promotion packet to a Unit Vacancy Board (UVB), which convened in May 1994, and that, as a result, he was effective

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

BAUER, Circuit Judge. Michael Reeves filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 challenging his conviction as obtained in violation of his Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel. The district court denied the petition because Reeves failed to demonstrate prejudice. Reeves appeals, and we review the denial of relief under § 2255 de novo. See Blacharski v.