Cases

USCA11 Case: 23-13863 Document: 54-1 Date Filed: 07/14/2025 Page: 1 of 13 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-13863 ____________________ RACHAEL M. GORECKI,

PER CURIAM. Bettye Williams petitioned for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income claiming she was unable to work due to hypertensive vascular disease, hydrocephalus with placement of a shunt, amblyopia, and anxiety disorder. Williams complained of fatigue, headaches, eye pain, hand cramping, foot swelling and mood problems. After determining Williams’s c

ORDER The memorandum disposition filed May 11, 1999, is redesignated as an authored opinion by Judge Reed. OPINION REED, District Judge: Felipe Verduzco appeals from the district court’s judgment affirming the Commissioner’s denial of his application for supplemental security income disability benefits.

ORDER Polly Reed applied for Disability Insurance Benefits in 2011 when she was 50 years old. An administrative law judge concluded that the residual effects of injuries to Reed’s left leg, sustained in a 2010 motorcycle accident, constituted a severe impairment. But the ALJ also concluded that Reed was exaggerating the physical limitations caused by that impairment and that she retained the residual functional capacity to perform her

ORDER SONJA F. BIVINS, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Claudia M. Reed (“Plaintiff’) brings this action seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her claim for a period of disability, disability insurance benefits, and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq., an

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION NANCY A. VECCHIARELLI, United States Magistrate Judge. This case is before the magistrate judge by consent. Plaintiff, Walter Blaylock (“Blaylock”), challenges the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying Blaylock’s application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (“Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 423 and 1381(a)

MEMORANDUM ** Plaintiff-Appellant Patricia Reed (“Mrs. Reed”) appeals from the district court’s *612judgment affirming Defendant-Appellee Commissioner’s adoption of the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) decision finding her husband Lonnie Reed (“Mr.Reed”) not disabled under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-34, 1381-83f, du

MEMORANDUM ** Plaintiff-Appellant Patricia Reed (“Mrs. Reed”) appeals from the district court’s *612judgment affirming Defendant-Appellee Commissioner’s adoption of the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) decision finding her husband Lonnie Reed (“Mr.Reed”) not disabled under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-34, 1381-83f, du

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Joann Reed appeals from the district court’s order affirming the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, which denied her applications for disability insur- *919 anee benefits and supplemental security income. We reverse and remand. I.

*101MEMORANDUM * Adrianne Reed-Goss applied for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Social Security Income payments under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § § 401 eí seq. and 1381 et seq., based on chronic knee problems exacerbated by a fall. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 to review the

419 F.Supp.2d 625 (2006) Stephanie REED, Plaintiff, v. Joanne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. CIV. A. 04-1475-KAJ. United States District Court, D. Delaware. March 9, 2006. *626 Michael J. Goodrick, Esq., Michael J. Goodrick, P.A., Wilmington, DE, for Plaintiff. David F. Chermol, Social Securit

MEMORANDUM * Reed-Goss appeals the district court’s partial dismissal of her complaint based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and Anderson v. Allstate Ins. Co., 630 F.2d 677, 681 (9th Cir.1980) (“subsequent events can validate a prematurely filed appeal”). We dismiss the appeal. We review de novo a dismissal for lack of subject ma

BERZON, Circuit Judge: The Commissioner of Social Security determined that Nadine Reed is not entitled to disability benefits or supplemental security income. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner on Reed’s challenge to that decision, and Reed appeals. We find that the Administrative Law Judge rejected for an improper reason Reed’s request for

ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. Shirl Roberson, who suffers from bipolar disorder, applied for social security disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. After the Social Security Administration (SSA) denied her benefits initially, she received a hearing before an administrative law judge (ALJ), who concluded that she was not disabled and denied her claim. The Appe

HEANEY, Circuit Judge. Teena Draper appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas affirming the decision of an administrative law judge (ALJ), on behalf of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (Commissioner). The ALJ found that Draper was not entitled to a period of disability insurance benefits nor eligible fo

MEMORANDUM ** Plaintiff Lonnie Reed appeals the district court’s order affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of his application for Social Security disability insurance benefits. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse and remand for further administrative proceedings. *536This is the sec

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Darrell Kimball v. Civil No. 21-cv-943-LM Opinion No. 2022 DNH 084 P Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner Social Security Administration ORDER Darrell Kimball seeks judicial review, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), of the decision of the Acting Commissio

HANSEN, Circuit Judge. Venita Reeder appeals the district court’s summary judgment order in favor of the Commissioner of Social Security, affirming the Commissioner’s decision to deny her social security disability insurance benefits. We reverse in part and remand for development of the record through proper IQ testing. I. Ms

BEAM, Circuit Judge. Patty Beekley appeals the district court’s affirmance of the denial of Social Security benefits. Because the record does not contain substantial evidence to support the findings of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), we reverse and remand for further proceedings. I. BACKGROUND Patty Beekley, who is forty-six

WOLLMAN, Chief Judge. Donna L. Gowell appeals from the district court’s 1 judgment affirming the denial of her application for disability insurance benefits pursuant to Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i) & 423. We affirm. I. Gowell was born on March