Cases

OPINION & ORDER NINA GERSHON, District Judge. Defendant the City of New York moves under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs complaint for retaliation pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq.1 Plaintiff cannot establish that he had a good fa

23-365-cv Frey v. City of New York United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit _____________________________________ August Term 2023 Argued: January 30, 2024 Decided: September 19, 2025 No. 23-365-cv _____________________________________ JASON FRE

Washington v City of New York (2021 NY Slip Op 00453) Washington v City of New York 2021 NY Slip Op 00453 Decided on January 27, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Burea

MEMORANDUM & ORDER MARGO K. BRODIE, District Judge: On December 12, 2012, Plaintiff Heidi Husser commenced this action against the New York-City Department of Education. (Compl., Docket Entry No. 1.) By Second Amended Complaint filed September 6, 2013, Plaintiff named John Shea and John O’Connell as additional defendants. (Second Am. Compl., Docket Entry No. 16.) Plaintiff brings claims of

Gurewitz v City of New York (2019 NY Slip Op 06384) Gurewitz v City of New York 2019 NY Slip Op 06384 Decided on August 28, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pur

MATSUMOTO, District Judge. Plaintiff Eileen Dechberry (“plaintiff’) commenced this action, pro se, on April 2, 2014, against defendant, the New York City Fire Department (“FDNY” or “defendant”) pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq., and the New York City Human Rights Law

23-7310 McClarin v. City of New York 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 ------ 4 August Term, 2024 5 (Argued: November 13, 2024 Decided: July 13, 2026) 6 Docket No. 23-7310 7 ____________________________________________________________ 8 JUSTIN McCLARIN

25-1506 Real Estate Board of New York, Inc. v. The City of New York In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2025 Argued: November 3, 2025 Decided: July 13, 2026 No. 25-1506 REAL ESTATE BOARD OF NEW YORK, INC., NEW YORK STATE ASSOCIA

MEMORANDUM & ORDER Jack B. Weinstein, Senior United States District Judge. Table of Contents I. Introduction ... 182 II. Facts ... 182 III. Procedural History ... 184 IV. Law ... 185 A. Summary Judgment ... 185 B. Official Immunity ... 185 1. Absolute Immunity ..

OPINION OF THE COURT Alexander W. Hunter, Jr., J. The application by petitioner for an order pursuant to CPLR article 78, directing respondents to provide petitioner with records responsive to petitioner’s Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) request 12-PL-106546 made pursuant to Public Officers Law § 84 et seq. is denied. The cross motion by respondents to dismiss the petition is granted.

*165OPINION OF THE COURT Lucy Billings, J. Petitioner seeks to vacate a decision dated June 24, 2009, after mandatory arbitration, terminating petitioner’s employment as a high school teacher by respondent New York City Department of Education upon finding that petitioner engaged in sexual misconduct and neglected his duties. (CPLR 7511 [b] [1]; Educa

*429 MEMORANDUM & ORDER MARGO K. BRODIE, District Judge: Plaintiff Rafael Soto commenced the above-captioned action on August 23, 2012. (Compl., Docket Entry No. 1.) On July 26, 2013, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint, bringing claims against the City of New York, County of Kings, District Attorney Charles J. Hynes, Detective Daniel

OPINION DEBORAH A. BATTS, District Judge. Plaintiff Maria Villar (“Plaintiff’ or “Vil-lar”), a Hispanic female, brings this employment discrimination action against the City of New York, Deputy Inspector Michael Yanosik, and Lieutenant John P. McGovern (collectively, “Defendants”) pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., the New York State Human

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge: This case arises from allegations by the Plaintiff Nancy Falcon (the “Plaintiff’) that her current employer the Defendant City University of New York (“CUNY”) violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VU”) by engaging in gender discrimination, creating a hostile work environment, and retaliating against her

701 F.Supp.2d 318 (2010) Lisa M. HALL, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Defendant. No. 06-CV-2908 (KAM)(LB). United States District Court, E.D. New York. March 30, 2010. *321 William Roche, Law Office of William A. Roche, Hicksville, NY, for Plaintiff. Daniel Chiu, Michael A. Cardozo Corporation Co

GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judge: This case requires us to consider whether detaining an individual pursuant to a material arrest warrant is a prosecutorial function entitled to absolute immunity. We hold that it is not. As the record is insufficient to determine whether defendants are entitled to qualified immunity, we vacate the judgment of the United States District Court for the

MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge: The City of New York (the “City”) here sues certain online cigarette sellers, those sellers’ cigarette suppliers, and several dozen of those sellers’ buyers (and downstream sellers), for violations of the Contraband Cigarette Trafficking Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2341, et seq., (the “CCTA”) and of the Racketeer Influenced an

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CHERYL L. POLLAK, United States Magistrate Judge. On November 14, 2011, plaintiffs Ernest Steve Barry (“Barry” or “plaintiff’) and Michael Burkhart (“Burkhart”) commenced this civil rights action, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against the City of New York, the New York City Transit Authori*419ty (“TA” or “defendant”)

OPINION & ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION.......................................................332 II. BACKGROUND.........................................................335 III. LEGAL STANDARD FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT........................337 IV. MONELL LIABILITY..................................

OPINION & ORDER KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge: Against the backdrop of a country reckoning with a number of fatal police shootings, this Court faces an excessive force claim involving the fatal shooting of an emotionally disturbed person by several New York City Police Department officers. On April 12, 2009, the wife of Mauricio Jaquez called 911 after her husband had an “emotional b