⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Reed v. Nash”

Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2019-03-21 · Published · cited 0×
THIRD DIVISION GOBEIL, J., COOMER and HODGES, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules March 12, 2019 I
District Court, W.D. New York · 2014-12-09 · Published · cited 0× · 72 F. Supp. 3d 396; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170253; 2014 WL 6908902
DECISION AND ORDER MICHAEL A. TELESCA, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Stephen and Cindy Reed (“plaintiffs”) bring this action against defendant Aqueon Products, and Central Garden and Pet (“defendants”) pursuant to this Court’s diversity jurisdiction for damages sustained when aquarium equipment manufactured by defendants caused a fire in their daughter’s bedroom.</
District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2010-02-09 · Published · cited 3× · 683 F. Supp. 2d 195; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50831; 2010 WL 446178
683 F.Supp.2d 195 (2010) William NASH, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. CVS CAREMARK CORP. and Holiday CVS, LLC, Defendants. C.A. No. 09-079 S. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. February 9, 2010. Peter N. Wasylyk, Peter N. Wasylyk— Attorney at Law, Providence, RI, Fran L. Rudich, Seth R. Lesser, Klafter,
Nash v. Perrypublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 1997-06-12 · Published · cited 4× · 944 S.W.2d 728; 1997 WL 194461
944 S.W.2d 728 (1997) Sean NASH and Sandra Nash, Individually and as Next Friends of Brendan Nash, a Minor, and as Next Friends of Kathleen Nash, a Minor, Appellants, v. Douglas Wayne PERRY, Janise White and Raul Quintero, Appellees. No. 03-96-00580-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. April 17, 1997. Rehearing Overruled June 12, 1997. Lonnie Roac
Nash v. Blatchfordpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2019-01-04 · Published · cited 1× · 435 P.3d 562; 56 Kan. App. 2d 592
Atcheson, J., concurring: I concur in the result affirming the Cowley County District Court's summary judgment in favor of Dr. Patrick T. Blatchford, M.D., the defendant in this medical malpractice action. Plaintiff Aaron Nash did not give notice as required under K.S.A. 2017 Supp. 12-105b(d), a failure the Kansas Supreme Court has determined to be a jurisdictional bar to actions governed by the Kansas Tort Claims Act regardl
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2022-05-16 · Published · cited 0×
FILED MAY 16 2022 ORDERED PUBLISHED SUSAN M. SPRAUL, CLERK U.S. BKCY. APP. PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2018-11-21 · Published · cited 0×
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Robert Edward Reed, individually and as the Executor of Racheal Ann Reed, deceased, FILED Plaintiff Below, Petitioner November 21, 2018 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK vs.) No. 18-0009 (Kanawha County 17-
Nash v. Beckettpublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2012-03-23 · Published · cited 32× · 365 S.W.3d 131; 2012 WL 967698; 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 2308
365 S.W.3d 131 (2012) Texie Beckett Carson NASH, Executrix of the C.M. Beckett, Jr. Estate and Successor Trustee of the C.M. Beckett, Jr. Testamentary Trusts, Appellant, v. Beverly BECKETT, Appellee. No. 06-11-00025-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Texarkana. Submitted: February 15, 2012. Decided: March 23, 2012. *133
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco) · 2014-08-21 · Published · cited 0× · 475 S.W.3d 353; 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 9276; 2014 WL 4114328
*355 OPINION REX D. DAVIS, Justice. This .is a summary judgment appeal. The trial court granted the amended motion for summary judgment of Appellee U.S. KingKing, LLC (KingKing) and denied the cross-motion for summary judgment of Appellant Rippy Interests, LLC (Rippy).
Nash v. Reedpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1950-04-28 · Published · cited 13× · 59 S.E.2d 259; 81 Ga. App. 473; 1950 Ga. App. LEXIS 921
81 Ga. App. 473 (1950) 59 S.E.2d 259 NASH v. REED. 32965. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided April 28, 1950. *474 James M. Embry, Dunaway, Riley & Howard, for plaintiff. Smith, Kilpatrick, Cody, Rogers & McClatchey, A. G. Cleveland Jr., for defendant. SUTTON, C. J.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002-04-03 · Published · cited 420× · 285 F.3d 287; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 5969; 2002 WL 499454
OPINION OF THE COURT SLOVITER, Circuit Judge. Frederick Ray, a former inmate in the Pennsylvania state prison system, appeals from the order of the District Court dismissing sua sponte Ray’s complaint against prison officials filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2001). 1 The District Court dismissed R
Reed, Bryan Williampublic domain
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015-03-31 · Published · cited 0×
PD-0166-15 March 31, 2015 IN THE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Bryan William Reed Petitioner, vs. No.________________ The State of Texas Respondent. ********************************************************* PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW ******************************
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2013-08-21 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-12-00456-CR Dwayne Edward Nash, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY, 33RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 39596, HONORABLE LLOYD DOUGLAS SHAVER, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION
Reed, Bryan Williampublic domain
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015-04-01 · Published · cited 0×
PD-0166-15 PD-0166-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 4/1/2015 11:24:22 AM Accepted 4/1/2015 5:19:04 PM
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2020-12-11 · Published · cited 0×
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS BERNARD REED, FILED Claimant Below, Petitioner December 11, 2020 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK vs.) No. 19-0644 (BOR Appeal No. 2053843)
Nash v. Statepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007-03-21 · Published · cited 5× · 951 So. 2d 1003; 2007 WL 837205
951 So.2d 1003 (2007) Leaita NASH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 4D05-4057. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. March 21, 2007. Rehearing Denied April 18, 2007. *1004 Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Elisabeth Porter, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2020-12-11 · Published · cited 0×
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS BERNARD REED, FILED Claimant Below, Petitioner December 11, 2020 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK vs.) No. 19-0648 (BOR Appeal No. 2052514)
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020-01-23 · Published · cited 8× · 301 Or. App. 825; 459 P.3d 253
825 Argued and submitted May 31, 2018; reversed and remanded as to Toyota Motor Credit Corporation and Toyota Financial Services, otherwise affirmed January 23, 2020 Erik Loyal REED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION and Toyota Financial Services, foreign corporations, and Capitol Toyota, an Oregon corporati
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2020-07-09 · Published · cited 0×
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS DANNY REED, FILED Claimant Below, Petitioner July 9, 2020 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2022-10-17 · Published · cited 0×
FILED October 17, 2022 released at 3:00 p.m. STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS