Cases

374 S.C. 19 (2007) 647 S.E.2d 209 James Earl REED, Petitioner, v. Jon OZMINT, Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Respondent. No. 26346. Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard May 1, 2007. Decided June 18, 2007. *22 Teresa L. Norris, of Blume, Weyble & Norris, of Columb

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2009 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

82 F.Supp.2d 775 (2000) Rodney McINTOSH, Plaintiff, v. STANLEY-BOSTITCH, INC., Defendant. No. C2-098-372. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. January 26, 2000. *776 *777 Patrick J. Piccininni, Brunner & Brunner, Columbus, OH, Jeffrey C. Pettys, Reed & Pettys, Col

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s judgment of conviction be affirmed. Reed contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions for possession with intent to distribute the heroi

Cook, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. I agree with the majority that McIntosh’s status as high school principal did not make him a public official for defamation purposes. I do not believe, however, that either R.C. 3319.08 or 3319.11(B)(1) supports the majority’s conclusion that a teacher eligible for continuing contract status can be presumed to have attained that status just by v

768 N.W.2d 325 (2009) McINTOSH v. McINTOSH. Docket No. 285528. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted October 7, 2008, at Grand Rapids. Decided February 17, 2009, at 9:05 a.m. *327 James D. Wines, Ann Arbor, for the plaintiff. James C. Boerigter, Kalamazoo, for the defendant. Before: MARKEY, P.J.,

977 So.2d 1257 (2008) Peirce McINTOSH, Appellant v. Gay Reed McINTOSH, Appellee. Gay Reed McIntosh, Appellant v. Peirce McIntosh, Appellee. Nos. 2006-CA-02136-COA, 2006-CA-01762-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. March 25, 2008. *1259 John H. Daniels, Greenville, attorney for appellant. Edward D. Lamar and F

332 S.C. 35 (1998) 503 S.E.2d 747 The STATE, Respondent, v. James Earl REED, Appellant. No. 24826. Supreme Court of South Carolina. Heard October 22, 1997. Decided July 27, 1998. Rehearing Denied August 27, 1998. *38 Chief Attorney Daniel T. Stacey, and Deputy Chief Attorn

OPINION OF THE COURT NEURAUTER, Judge: Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted of three specifications of graft in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ]. Appellant was acquitted of three other specifications of graft and of one specification of conspiracy to commit graft (Article 81, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 881). A panel of officers, sit

Gail McIntosh Smith ("the wife") appeals from a judgment terminating the obligation of Herbert H. McIntosh ("the husband") to name her as the beneficiary of his military Survivor Benefit Plan ("SBP")1 and as the beneficiary of a life-insurance policy issued by Serviceman's Group Life Insurance ("the life-insurance policy"). The record indicates the following. After a 31-year marriage, the parties divorced on July 23, 2001. The

339 S.C. 148 (2000) 528 S.E.2d 94 John W. REED, Appellant, v. ASSOCIATED INVESTMENTS OF EDISTO ISLAND, INC. and Lawrence Savage, III, as agent for Associated Investments of Edisto Island, Inc., Respondents. Associated Investments of Edisto Island, Inc., Third Party, Plaintiff, v. Engineering and Technical Services, Inc., Third Party, Defendant. No. 3118. Court of App

MAXWELL, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. This child-custody dispute requires that we determine whether the chancellor applied the correct legal standard. M.T.F.1 lived with his great-grandmother, Irene Daniels, for twelve years before his father, Marvin Fair, sought custody. The chancellor applied the Albright factors and found awarding custody to Fair was in M.T.F.’s best inter

Opinion issued July 24, 2014. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00768-CR ——————————— DARRYL THOMAS REED, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

PER CURIAM: This is an appeal by Donald McIntosh (hereinafter “Appellant”) from an order of the Circuit Court of Monongalia County convicting him of three counts of third degree sexual assault. The Appellant was sentenced *567to one to five years on each count, to run concurrently.1 The Appellant contends that the lower court erred by perm

ROVNER, Circuit Judge. Following a bench trial, Antwan Kenya Reed was convicted of possession with intent to distribute heroin, possession of a firearm by a felon, and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime. On appeal, he contends that there was no probable cause to issue the warrant that led to the discovery of certain evidence used against him at tria

11 YELYERTON, J. William and Judy McIntosh, individually and on behalf of their minor daughter, Dusty, filed a petition for damages as a result of alleged acts of sexual molestation inflicted by William Walker, Jr. (Billy) several years earlier. The defendants remaining at the trial were Billy’s parents, William Walker, Sr. and Donna Máxime Aucoin; Billy’s stepmother, Tena Walker; and Mr. Walker’s insurer, State Farm Fire &am;

OPINION DOWD, District Judge. DefendanVAppellant (hereafter “defendant”), convicted of one count of bank fraud on his plea of guilty, challenges his sentence to a prison tem of 30 months. The base offense level for bank fraud was set at six levels. In computation of the adjusted offense level, four levels were added, in compliance with U.S.S.G. § 2Fl.l(b)(l)(F), based on a finding that the loss exceeded $

191 P.3d 341 (2008) STATE of Kansas, Appellee, v. Donnie E. REED, Appellant. No. 97,507. Court of Appeals of Kansas. August 29, 2008. *344 Korey A. Kaul, of Kansas Appellate Defender Office, for appellant. Sheryl L. Lidtke, deputy district attorney, Jerome A. Gorman, district attorney, and Paul J. Morrison, attorney genera

126 S.W.3d 407 (2004) In re the MARRIAGE OF Kristi C. McINTOSH and Cody L. McIntosh. Kristi C. McIntosh, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Cody L. McIntosh, Respondent-Appellant. No. 25510. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One. January 29, 2004. *408 Patrick W. Rodery, Mountain Grove, for appellant. Randy

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-CA-00154-COA McINTOSH TRANSPORT, LLC APPELLANT v. LOVE’S TRAVEL STOPS & COUNTRY APPELLEES STORES, INC. AND EMPIRE TRUCK SALES, LLC DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/23/2020 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JAMES T. KITCHENS JR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: LOWNDES CO