Cases

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Joann Reed appeals from the district court’s order affirming the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, which denied her applications for disability insur- *919 anee benefits and supplemental security income. We reverse and remand. I.

BERZON, Circuit Judge: The Commissioner of Social Security determined that Nadine Reed is not entitled to disability benefits or supplemental security income. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner on Reed’s challenge to that decision, and Reed appeals. We find that the Administrative Law Judge rejected for an improper reason Reed’s request for

CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J. Plaintiff John Reed filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), requesting judicial review of the final decision of the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administrator, denying his claim for Supplemental Security Income ("SSI"). The Court referred the case to United States Magistra

ORDER The memorandum disposition filed May 11, 1999, is redesignated as an authored opinion by Judge Reed. OPINION REED, District Judge: Felipe Verduzco appeals from the district court’s judgment affirming the Commissioner’s denial of his application for supplemental security income disability benefits.

USCA11 Case: 23-13863 Document: 54-1 Date Filed: 07/14/2025 Page: 1 of 13 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-13863 ____________________ RACHAEL M. GORECKI,

ORDER Polly Reed applied for Disability Insurance Benefits in 2011 when she was 50 years old. An administrative law judge concluded that the residual effects of injuries to Reed’s left leg, sustained in a 2010 motorcycle accident, constituted a severe impairment. But the ALJ also concluded that Reed was exaggerating the physical limitations caused by that impairment and that she retained the residual functional capacity to perform her

ORDER SONJA F. BIVINS, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Claudia M. Reed (“Plaintiff’) brings this action seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her claim for a period of disability, disability insurance benefits, and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq., an

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION NANCY A. VECCHIARELLI, United States Magistrate Judge. This case is before the magistrate judge by consent. Plaintiff, Walter Blaylock (“Blaylock”), challenges the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying Blaylock’s application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (“Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 423 and 1381(a)

PER CURIAM. Bettye Williams petitioned for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income claiming she was unable to work due to hypertensive vascular disease, hydrocephalus with placement of a shunt, amblyopia, and anxiety disorder. Williams complained of fatigue, headaches, eye pain, hand cramping, foot swelling and mood problems. After determining Williams’s c

MEMORANDUM OPINION SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Stephanie M. Reed (“plaintiff’) appeals from a decision of Michael J. Astrue, the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner” or “defendant”), denying her application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-433. Currently before the court are the par

MEMORANDUM ** Plaintiff-Appellant Patricia Reed (“Mrs. Reed”) appeals from the district court’s *612judgment affirming Defendant-Appellee Commissioner’s adoption of the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) decision finding her husband Lonnie Reed (“Mr.Reed”) not disabled under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-34, 1381-83f, du

MEMORANDUM ** Plaintiff-Appellant Patricia Reed (“Mrs. Reed”) appeals from the district court’s *612judgment affirming Defendant-Appellee Commissioner’s adoption of the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) decision finding her husband Lonnie Reed (“Mr.Reed”) not disabled under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-34, 1381-83f, du

(2008) Patricia L. REED, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. C07-0067. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Cedar Rapids Division. April 21, 2008. ORDER ON JUDICIAL REVIEW JON STUART SCOLES, United States Magistrate Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION

*101MEMORANDUM * Adrianne Reed-Goss applied for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Social Security Income payments under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § § 401 eí seq. and 1381 et seq., based on chronic knee problems exacerbated by a fall. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 to review the

MEMORANDUM * Reed-Goss appeals the district court’s partial dismissal of her complaint based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and Anderson v. Allstate Ins. Co., 630 F.2d 677, 681 (9th Cir.1980) (“subsequent events can validate a prematurely filed appeal”). We dismiss the appeal. We review de novo a dismissal for lack of subject ma

419 F.Supp.2d 625 (2006) Stephanie REED, Plaintiff, v. Joanne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. CIV. A. 04-1475-KAJ. United States District Court, D. Delaware. March 9, 2006. *626 Michael J. Goodrick, Esq., Michael J. Goodrick, P.A., Wilmington, DE, for Plaintiff. David F. Chermol, Social Securit

MEMORANDUM ** Plaintiff Lonnie Reed appeals the district court’s order affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of his application for Social Security disability insurance benefits. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse and remand for further administrative proceedings. *536This is the sec

MEMORANDUM COBB, District Judge. Pursuant to § 205(g) of the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C.Supp. § 405(g), this action requests judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. The Commissioner denied the plaintiffs claim for child insurance benefits after the demise of one of the child’s life-long caretakers, Sam Reed, Jr., on March 29,

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Leo England appeals from the district *1019 court’s 1 order affirming the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner) that denied England’s application for benefits. We affirm.

BYE, Circuit Judge. Geneva Goff appeals from the district court’s 1 order affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of her application for disability insurance and supplemental security income benefits. Goff claims she is disabled because two strokes have affected her walking, motor capabilities, and speech.