Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
5 opinions for “Reed v. Carpenelli”
Baird v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.public domain
Opinion by Mr. Chief Justice Bell, On August 4, 1961, appellants George Baird, Richard Lawson, Harry Belinsky and Duquesne Building & Supply Co., Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Duquesne) filed a complaint in a trespass action against Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as D & B), which alleged that (1) on or about January 19, 1961, D & B published and sen
Sherman v. Manufacturers Light & Heat Co.public domain
Opinion by Mr. Justice Bell, Plaintiff was injured on February 12, 1952, in a collision between the automobile he was driving and a truck of the defendant company. The questions of negligence and contributory negligence were vigorously contested. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $22,000. Plaintiff sought a new trial because of alleged errors in the charge of the Court, and because th
Karcesky v. Lariapublic domain
Opinion by Mb. Justice Bell, Plaintiffs motion for a new trial based upon the inadequacy of the verdict was refused by the Court below. Laria and Werner each moved for a judgment n.o.v. and each motion was refused by the Court below. These appeals followed. Plaintiffs walked across Seventh Avenue in the middle of the block between 12th and 13th Streets in Beaver Falls, Pennsylvania,
Coleman v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.public domain
Argued April 24, 1945. Plaintiffs and their predecessor trustee owned the gas and oil rights in some six and one-half acres of land in Allegheny County, and the Pittsburgh Coal Company was the owner of the coal thereunder. On March 17, 1927, plaintiffs' predecessor trustee made a written agreement with the Coal Company to provide mutual safeguards in connection with the drilling and operation of gas wells which passed through the defendant's coal; and the Coal Company agreed to leave a solid
Ragnar Benson, Inc. v. Jacob G. Kassab, J. G. Kassab, Inc., and Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporationpublic domain
MARIS, Circuit Judge. These are cross appeals in an action brought in the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania by the plaintiff, Ragnar Benson, Inc., against the defendants Jacob G. Kassab, J. G. Kassab, Inc., and Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation seeking a judgment in the amount of $541,424.00, the amount b