⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

6 opinions for “Reed Semiconductor Corp. v. MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC.”

District Court, N.D. California · 2014-04-01 · Published · cited 0× · 36 F. Supp. 3d 912; 2014 WL 1308743; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45728
Re: ECF No. 924. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NONINFRINGEMENT JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION In this patent infringement action involving ‘Wireless Modem” Patent No. 5,592,491 (“the '491 Patent”), Defendants Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”), Sprint Spectrum L.P. (“Sprint”), HTC America, Inc. (“HTC”), United States Ce
District Court, N.D. California · 1999-02-12 · Published · cited 17× · 38 F. Supp. 2d 802; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2656; 1999 WL 137641
38 F.Supp.2d 802 (1999) ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC., Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION and United Technologies Corporation, Defendants. And Related Actions No. C 97-20797 RMW. United States District Court, N.D. California. February 12, 1999. *803 *804
District Court, D. Delaware · 2010-02-22 · Published · cited 3× · 687 F. Supp. 2d 449; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15526; 2010 WL 605260
687 F.Supp.2d 449 (2010) CORDANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. AMAZON.COM, INC. and, Amazon Web Services, LLC, Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-491-MPT. United States District Court, D. Delaware. February 22, 2010. *451 Steven J. Balick, Esquire, John G. Day, Esquire, and Tiffany Geyer Lydon, Esquire, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington,
District Court, N.D. California · 1988-08-04 · Published · cited 52× · 692 F. Supp. 1171; 19 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20459; 28 ERC (BNA) 1538; 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8582; 1988 WL 81130
692 F.Supp. 1171 (1988) INTEL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. The HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. C 87-20434 RPA. United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division. August 4, 1988. *1172 John A. Skelton, Jr., Michael H. Porrazzo, Williams, Kelly, Polverari & Skelton, Redwood City, Ca
California Court of Appeal · 2020-01-21 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 1/21/20 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR TECHNO LITE, INC., B284989 c/w B289486 (Los Angeles County Plaintiff, Cross-defendant Super. Ct. No. LC101264) and Respondent, v. EMCOD, LLC, et al., Defe
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2021-02-25 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 15-1307 25 February 2021 *************************************** CELLCAST TECHNOLOGIES, * LLC AND ENVISIONIT, LLC, * * Plaintiffs, * Patent Infringement; RCFC 16(b)(4); * Good Cause; Modification of v.