Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Redmond v. Fifth Third Bank”
Redmond v. Fifth Third Bankpublic domain
624 F.3d 793 (2010) James A. REDMOND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIFTH THIRD BANK, f/k/a Pinnacle Bank, Defendant-Appellee. No. 08-4288. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Decided[1] October 20, 2010. *796 David P. Von Ebers (submitted), Attorney, Help-U-Settle Attorneys, Oak Park, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellan
Redmond, James A. v. Fifth Third Bankpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 08-4288 JAMES A. R EDMOND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. F IFTH T HIRD B ANK, f/k/a P INNACLE B ANK, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.
Dreibelbiss Title Co. v. Fifth Third Bankpublic domain
806 N.E.2d 345 (2004) DREIBELBISS TITLE COMPANY, INC. d/b/a Commonwealth/Dreibelbiss Title Company, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. FIFTH THIRD BANK, as Successor in Interest to Civitas Bank, Appellee-Defendant. No. 49A02-0309-CV-823. Court of Appeals of Indiana. April 20, 2004. *346 Brian L. England, Hunt Suedhoff Kalamaros, Indianapoli
CPC Livestock, LLC v. Fifth Third Bank, Inc.public domain
Memorandum Opinion and Order JOSEPH H. McKINLEY, JR., Chief Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Abstention and Remand [DN 21]. Also before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Enlargement of Page Limit for their Reply [DN 35]. Fully briefed, this matter is ripe for decision. For the following reasons, the motions are GRANTED. I. Background
Redmond, Jr. v. United Statespublic domain
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 22-CO-0555 JESSE R. REDMOND, JR., APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES,
People v. Redmondpublic domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the Illinois Official Reports accuracy and integrity of this
Mickell Lowery v. Michael Redmondpublic domain
05/23/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON February 8, 2022 Session MICKELL LOWERY v. MICHAEL REDMOND ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Shelby County No. CH-17-1580 JoeDae L. Jenkins, Chancellor ___________
Redmond v. Hassanpublic domain
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND JUDGMENT ORTRIE D. SMITH, Senior District Judge. /. BACKGROUND A. Procedural History This is an adversary proceeding arising from the Chapter 7 bankruptcy filed by Debtors Ashraf Hassan and his wife, Irina Hassan. The suit was originally brought by the Trustee and Kansas Express International, Inc.
Redmond v. First Guaranty Mortg. Corp.public domain
LAMBERT, J. Eric M. Redmond timely appeals the trial court's denial of his Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b) motion for relief from a final judgment of foreclosure. Concluding that the court reached the right result, albeit for the wrong reason, we affirm. The appellee, First Guaranty Mortgage Corporation ("First Guaranty"), sued Redmond and his codefendant, Kimberly Thomas-Tornillo, in foreclosure because the
Redmond v. First Guaranty Mortg. Corp.public domain
LAMBERT, J. Eric M. Redmond timely appeals the trial court's denial of his Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b) motion for relief from a final judgment of foreclosure. Concluding that the court reached the right result, albeit for the wrong reason, we affirm. The appellee, First Guaranty Mortgage Corporation ("First Guaranty"), sued Redmond and his codefendant, Kimberly Thomas-Tornillo, in foreclosure because the
In Re Redmondpublic domain
380 B.R. 179 (2007) In re: James A. REDMOND, Debtor. No. 96-B-03162. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. December 20, 2007. *180 *181 David P. von Ebers, Toussaint & Carlson, Chicago, IL, for Debtor. Edward J. Lesniak, Burke, Warren, MacKay & Serritella, Chi
People v. Redmondpublic domain
2025 IL App (1st) 231795 FIRST DISTRICT SECOND DIVISION November 12, 2025 No. 1-23-1795 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ) Appeal from the
Redmond v. Jenkins (In Re Alternate Fuels, Inc.)public domain
KELLY, Circuit Judge. Appellants William Karl Jenkins and M. Earlene Jenkins (collectively, Mr. Jenkins) appeal from an order of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) affirming the bankruptcy court’s dismissal of their claim for the payment of certain secured promissory notes. In re Alternate Fuels, Inc., 507 B.R. 324 (B.A.P. 10th Cir.2014). The bankruptcy court found that Mr. Jenkins’ claim was not an allowed claim be
Redmond v. Karr (In Re Karr)public domain
442 B.R. 785 (2011) In re John William KARR, Debtor. Christopher J. Redmond, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Alexico Corporation, Plaintiff, v. John William Karr, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 09-20008. Adversary No. 09-6055. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas. January 19, 2011. *788 P. Glen Smith, Husch Blackwell LLP, Kansas Ci
Redmond v. NCMIC Finance Corp. (In re Brooke Corp.)public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION FOLLOWING TRIAL FINDING THE TRUSTEE MAY AVOID CONSTRUCTIVELY FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS AND RECOVER THEIR VALUE FROM THE DEFENDANT Dale L. Somers, United States Bankruptcy Judge Plaintiff Christopher J. Redmond, as Trustee (Trustee) of Brooke Corporation (Brooke Corp), Brooke Capital Corporation (f/k/a Brooke Franchise Corporation) and Brooke Investments, Inc., seeks to avoid as constructivel
Redmond v. NCMIC Finance Corp. (In re Brooke Corp.)public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING NCMIC FINANCE CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNT V DALE L. SOMERS, Bankruptcy Judge. In Counts IV and V of the Complaint, Plaintiff Christopher J. Redmond, Chapter 7 Trustee (Trustee) of Debtors Brooke Corporation, Brooke Capital Corporation, and Brooke Investments, Inc., seeks to avoid allegedly fraudulent transfers made by the Debtors and to recover the
Avocent Redmond Corp. v. Rose Electronics, Inc.public domain
516 F.Supp.2d 1199 (2007) AVOCENT REDMOND CORP., Plaintiffs, v. ROSE ELECTRONICS, INC., et al., Defendants. No. C06-1711MJP. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle. October 9, 2007. *1200 Donald L. Jackson, J. Scott Davidson, James D. Berquist, Davidson Berquist Jackson & Gowdey LLP, Arlington, VA, John Ala
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANTING GMAC’S MOTION AND DENYING THE TRUSTEE’S MOTION Dale L. Somers, United States Bankruptcy Judge Plaintiff Christopher J. Redmond, the Chapter 7 Trustee of Debtor Brooke Capital Corporation, seeks to recover from Defendant GMAC- Insurance Management Corporation (GMAC) as preferential transfers and fraudulent conveyances approximately $
MOSIER, Bankruptcy Judge. Recharacterization is an equitable remedy that allows courts to ignore a party’s characterization of a transaction and, instead, give effect to the transaction’s actual substance. In bankruptcy cases, under certain circumstances, a transaction labeled as a loan may be recharacterized as an equity investment. In this case, William Karl Jenkins (Jenkins) and his wife Earlene Jenkins appeal the bankruptc
Redmond v. NCMIC Finance Corp. (In re Brooke Corp.)public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART THE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIM COMPLAINT DALE L. SOMERS, Bankruptcy Judge. Plaintiff Christopher J. Redmond, Chapter 7 Trustee (Trustee) of Debtors Brooke Corporation, Brooke Capital Corporation, and Brooke Investments, Inc., moves under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and (c), made applicable to this proceeding by Federal Rule of Bank