⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Redmond v. Fifth Third Bank”

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010-10-20 · Published · cited 44× · 624 F.3d 793; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 21619; 2010 WL 4103698
624 F.3d 793 (2010) James A. REDMOND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIFTH THIRD BANK, f/k/a Pinnacle Bank, Defendant-Appellee. No. 08-4288. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Decided[1] October 20, 2010. *796 David P. Von Ebers (submitted), Attorney, Help-U-Settle Attorneys, Oak Park, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellan
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010-10-20 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 08-4288 JAMES A. R EDMOND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. F IFTH T HIRD B ANK, f/k/a P INNACLE B ANK, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004-04-20 · Published · cited 5× · 806 N.E.2d 345; 2004 Ind. App. LEXIS 680; 2004 WL 837859
806 N.E.2d 345 (2004) DREIBELBISS TITLE COMPANY, INC. d/b/a Commonwealth/Dreibelbiss Title Company, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. FIFTH THIRD BANK, as Successor in Interest to Civitas Bank, Appellee-Defendant. No. 49A02-0309-CV-823. Court of Appeals of Indiana. April 20, 2004. *346 Brian L. England, Hunt Suedhoff Kalamaros, Indianapoli
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2013-04-08 · Published · cited 2× · 495 B.R. 332; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49988; 2013 WL 1411222
Memorandum Opinion and Order JOSEPH H. McKINLEY, JR., Chief Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Abstention and Remand [DN 21]. Also before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Enlargement of Page Limit for their Reply [DN 35]. Fully briefed, this matter is ripe for decision. For the following reasons, the motions are GRANTED. I. Background
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025-07-31 · Published · cited 0×
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 22-CO-0555 JESSE R. REDMOND, JR., APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES,
People v. Redmondpublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2018-07-31 · Published · cited 6× · 2018 IL App (1st) 151188
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the Illinois Official Reports accuracy and integrity of this
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2022-05-23 · Published · cited 0×
05/23/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON February 8, 2022 Session MICKELL LOWERY v. MICHAEL REDMOND ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Shelby County No. CH-17-1580 JoeDae L. Jenkins, Chancellor ___________
Redmond v. Hassanpublic domain
District Court, D. Kansas · 2014-09-23 · Published · cited 1× · 523 B.R. 729; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 133298; 2014 WL 4725798
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND JUDGMENT ORTRIE D. SMITH, Senior District Judge. /. BACKGROUND A. Procedural History This is an adversary proceeding arising from the Chapter 7 bankruptcy filed by Debtors Ashraf Hassan and his wife, Irina Hassan. The suit was originally brought by the Trustee and Kansas Express International, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019-04-12 · Published · cited 0× · 268 So. 3d 918
LAMBERT, J. Eric M. Redmond timely appeals the trial court's denial of his Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b) motion for relief from a final judgment of foreclosure. Concluding that the court reached the right result, albeit for the wrong reason, we affirm. The appellee, First Guaranty Mortgage Corporation ("First Guaranty"), sued Redmond and his codefendant, Kimberly Thomas-Tornillo, in foreclosure because the
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019-04-12 · Published · cited 0× · 268 So. 3d 918
LAMBERT, J. Eric M. Redmond timely appeals the trial court's denial of his Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b) motion for relief from a final judgment of foreclosure. Concluding that the court reached the right result, albeit for the wrong reason, we affirm. The appellee, First Guaranty Mortgage Corporation ("First Guaranty"), sued Redmond and his codefendant, Kimberly Thomas-Tornillo, in foreclosure because the
In Re Redmondpublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007-12-20 · Published · cited 13× · 380 B.R. 179; 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 4216; 2007 WL 4545842
380 B.R. 179 (2007) In re: James A. REDMOND, Debtor. No. 96-B-03162. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. December 20, 2007. *180 *181 David P. von Ebers, Toussaint & Carlson, Chicago, IL, for Debtor. Edward J. Lesniak, Burke, Warren, MacKay & Serritella, Chi
People v. Redmondpublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2025-11-12 · Published · cited 8× · 2025 IL App (1st) 231795
2025 IL App (1st) 231795 FIRST DISTRICT SECOND DIVISION November 12, 2025 No. 1-23-1795 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ) Appeal from the
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015-06-12 · Published · cited 21× · 789 F.3d 1139; 73 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1457; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 9915; 61 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 43; 2015 WL 3635366
KELLY, Circuit Judge. Appellants William Karl Jenkins and M. Earlene Jenkins (collectively, Mr. Jenkins) appeal from an order of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) affirming the bankruptcy court’s dismissal of their claim for the payment of certain secured promissory notes. In re Alternate Fuels, Inc., 507 B.R. 324 (B.A.P. 10th Cir.2014). The bankruptcy court found that Mr. Jenkins’ claim was not an allowed claim be
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2011-01-19 · Published · cited 2× · 442 B.R. 785; 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 359; 2011 WL 160612
442 B.R. 785 (2011) In re John William KARR, Debtor. Christopher J. Redmond, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Alexico Corporation, Plaintiff, v. John William Karr, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 09-20008. Adversary No. 09-6055. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas. January 19, 2011. *788 P. Glen Smith, Husch Blackwell LLP, Kansas Ci
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2017-05-15 · Published · cited 1× · 568 B.R. 378; 2017 Bankr. LEXIS 1320
MEMORANDUM OPINION FOLLOWING TRIAL FINDING THE TRUSTEE MAY AVOID CONSTRUCTIVELY FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS AND RECOVER THEIR VALUE FROM THE DEFENDANT Dale L. Somers, United States Bankruptcy Judge Plaintiff Christopher J. Redmond, as Trustee (Trustee) of Brooke Corporation (Brooke Corp), Brooke Capital Corporation (f/k/a Brooke Franchise Corporation) and Brooke Investments, Inc., seeks to avoid as constructivel
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2013-03-13 · Published · cited 6× · 488 B.R. 459; 2013 WL 1002258; 2013 Bankr. LEXIS 922; 57 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 208
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING NCMIC FINANCE CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNT V DALE L. SOMERS, Bankruptcy Judge. In Counts IV and V of the Complaint, Plaintiff Christopher J. Redmond, Chapter 7 Trustee (Trustee) of Debtors Brooke Corporation, Brooke Capital Corporation, and Brooke Investments, Inc., seeks to avoid allegedly fraudulent transfers made by the Debtors and to recover the
District Court, W.D. Washington · 2007-10-09 · Published · cited 4× · 516 F. Supp. 2d 1199; 2007 WL 2903246; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76085
516 F.Supp.2d 1199 (2007) AVOCENT REDMOND CORP., Plaintiffs, v. ROSE ELECTRONICS, INC., et al., Defendants. No. C06-1711MJP. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle. October 9, 2007. *1200 Donald L. Jackson, J. Scott Davidson, James D. Berquist, Davidson Berquist Jackson & Gowdey LLP, Arlington, VA, John Ala
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2015-09-29 · Published · cited 0× · 539 B.R. 605; 2015 Bankr. LEXIS 3387
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANTING GMAC’S MOTION AND DENYING THE TRUSTEE’S MOTION Dale L. Somers, United States Bankruptcy Judge Plaintiff Christopher J. Redmond, the Chapter 7 Trustee of Debtor Brooke Capital Corporation, seeks to recover from Defendant GMAC- Insurance Management Corporation (GMAC) as preferential transfers and fraudulent conveyances approximately $
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2014-03-18 · Published · cited 0× · 507 B.R. 324
MOSIER, Bankruptcy Judge. Recharacterization is an equitable remedy that allows courts to ignore a party’s characterization of a transaction and, instead, give effect to the transaction’s actual substance. In bankruptcy cases, under certain circumstances, a transaction labeled as a loan may be recharacterized as an equity investment. In this case, William Karl Jenkins (Jenkins) and his wife Earlene Jenkins appeal the bankruptc
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2013-01-15 · Published · cited 1× · 485 B.R. 650; 2013 WL 153694; 2013 Bankr. LEXIS 166
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART THE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIM COMPLAINT DALE L. SOMERS, Bankruptcy Judge. Plaintiff Christopher J. Redmond, Chapter 7 Trustee (Trustee) of Debtors Brooke Corporation, Brooke Capital Corporation, and Brooke Investments, Inc., moves under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and (c), made applicable to this proceeding by Federal Rule of Bank