Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Red Ball, Inc. v. Red Ball Associates”
Hearn v. Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc.public domain
RULING ON MOTION DAWKINS, Senior District Judge. Defendants seek to have dismissed one element of Home Indemnity Company’s intervention claiming as Red Ball’s subrogee for property damage. It is contended that prescription1 bars intervenor’s attempt to recover $1,371.70 paid by it to Vicksburg Chemical Company under an insurance policy covering collision damage to one of that c
ORDER AND OPINION HODGES, Judge. The Department of Defense contracts with private companies to provide support for military personnel and their families when assigned to new duty stations. These moving companies are qualified by the Government based on a series of Department of Defense regulations. One of these regulations states that movers must declare any common ownership, because commonly owned movers
Ball v. Kasichpublic domain
EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification , which is, for the reasons that follow, GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART . (ECF No. 42.) I. OVERVIEW This case was filed by Disability Rights Ohio and the Center for Public Representation on behalf of Plaintiffs Phyllis
Red Ball Oxygen Company, Inc. v. Southwest Railroad Car Parts Company and Air Liquide Industrial U.S., L.P.public domain
OPINION James T. Worthen, Chief Justice This case involves a dispute over a supply contract between Red Ball Oxygen Company, Inc. and Southwest Railroad Car Parts Company which led to litigation involving a suit on account, tortious interference, and reciprocal breach of contract claims. In six issues, Red Ball asserts the trial court miscon
Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc. v. Shannonpublic domain
377 U.S. 311 (1964) RED BALL MOTOR FREIGHT, INC., ET AL. v. SHANNON ET AL., DOING BUSINESS AS E. & R. SHANNON. No. 406. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 28, 1964. Decided June 1, 1964.[*] APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Amos M. Mathews argued the cause for appellants i
Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc. v. Shannonpublic domain
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. The motion of Transportation Association of America for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, is granted. The motion of the Common Carrier Conference — Irregular Route of the American Trucking Associations, Inc., for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, in No. 421 is granted. Probable jurisdiction noted. Reported below: 219 F. Supp. 781
PER CURIAM: The employer (“Red Ball”) petitions to set aside a remedial back pay and reinstatement order entered by the National Labor Relations Board against it, and the Board cross-petitions for enforcement of the order. Red Ball had discharged its employee, Linda Surley, at the close of a work day, allege
Ball v. City of Lincolnpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Laurie Smith Camp, Chief United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 55), filed by Defendant City of Lincoln (the “City”); the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Filing No. 57), filed by Defendant SMG; and the Motion for Leave to File Rebuttal to Defendants’ Supplemental Index of Evidence (Filing No. 69), filed by Pla
Red Ball Interior Demolition Corp. v. Palmadessapublic domain
908 F.Supp. 1226 (1995) RED BALL INTERIOR DEMOLITION CORP. and John Palmadessa, Plaintiffs, v. Daniel PALMADESSA, Donald Palmadessa, William Palmadessa, Supreme Recycling, Inc., and Fortune Interior Dismantling Corp., Defendants. No. 94 Civ. 4158 (RWS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 28, 1995. *1227
Susan Ball v. Cherie Kotterpublic domain
BAUER, Circuit Judge. This movie-script-like case features three main characters: Donald C. Hedstrom, a now-deceased, ex-husband buyer; Cherie Kotter, an ex-wife real estate agent; and Hope Geldes, the decedent’s real estate attorney. The action begins with Hedstrom’s desire to purchase two condominium units in Chicago’s Lake Point Tower. He retained the services of Kotter and G
PIH Beaverton LLC v. Red Shield Ins. Co.public domain
DEHOOG, P. J. *790This is an action between insurance companies concerning the duty to defend against claims arising out of construction defects. Defendant American States Insurance Company was the insurer of Gary Thompson dba Portland Plastering (Thompson), a subcontractor hired by general contractor Super One, Inc. (Super One) to do construct
Sa v. Red Frog Events, LLCpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER PARTIALLY GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This action arises out of an unfortunate and tragic accident during a running race organized by Defendant Red Frog Events, resulting in Plaintiff James Sa’s paralysis from his chest down. On January 23, 2013, Plaintiff filed a three-count Complaint, asse
262 Kan. 570 (1997) 938 P.2d 1281 THE HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellant/Cross-appellee, v. AMERICAN RED BALL TRANSIT COMPANY, INC., and ALBERT PRINTUP, Appellees, and BARRY L. SMITH, Administrator of the Estate of Glen C. Smith, deceased, et al., Appellees/Cross-appellants. No. 74,656. Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed June 6, 199
McCaughtry v. City of Red Wingpublic domain
ANDERSON, PAUL H., Justice (concurring). “I have got to say, that’s a good no-call.” Phil Simms CBS Sports Announcer Super Bowl XLVII February 3, 2013 I concur with the result reached by the court. When subjected to a facial challenge under Minnesota’s Constitution, the City of Red Wing’s rental inspection and licensing ordinance pass
Bell v. Red Ball Potato Co., Inc.public domain
430 A.2d 835 (1981) Reginald BELL and Amos Bell v. RED BALL POTATO COMPANY, INC. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued January 12, 1981. Decided June 10, 1981. William J. Smith (orally), Van Buren, for plaintiff. Sage, Ayoob & Langley, Richard A. Langley (orally), Fort Fairfield, for defendant. Before McKUSICK, C. J., and WERNICK, GODFREY, NICHOL
Ball, Ball and Brosamer, Inc. v. Martinpublic domain
800 F.Supp. 967 (1992) BALL, BALL AND BROSAMER, INC., Plaintiff, v. Lynn MARTIN, Secretary of Labor, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 91-3266 (CRR). United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 18, 1992. *968 G. Henry Seaks, Duncan, Weinberg, Miller & Pembroke, P.C., Denver, Colo., Frederick L. Miller, Duncan, We
DECISION ON MOTIONS FOR ■'SUM- , MARY - JUDGMENT . AND ASSET FREEZING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ROBERT E. GERBER, UNITED' STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE: In the chapter 11 cases of debtors Soundview Elite Ltd. (“Elite”) and its affiliates (collectively, and with Elite, the “Soundview Debtors”), plaintiff Corinne Ball (the “Trüstee”) was appointed chapter 11 trustee for the Soundview Debtors after this Court removed
Ball v. City of Coral Gablespublic domain
(2008) Patrick K. BALL, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CORAL GABLES et. al., Defendants. Case No. 07-20949-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. April 9, 2008. ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JOSE E. MARTINEZ, District Judge. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendants City of Coral Gables' and the Ci
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE. SENTELLE, Circuit Judge: Appellant Ball, Ball & Brosamer, Inc. (“Ball”) appeals from an order of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of the Secretary of Labor in an action to review the Secretary’s determination that Ball and its subcontractor violated the Davis-Bacon Act whi
COURT’S FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW A. HOWARD MATZ, Senior District Judge. INTRODUCTION Resolution of the dispute that is at the core of this case should not have required a trial. It is a contract dispute over who has the right to license the Golden Globes Award Show for television broadcast. The parties could have settled their differences even before the complaint was fi