Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
10 opinions for “Recovery Effort Inc. v. Zeichner Ellman & Krause LLP”
Kahraman v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF, District Judge. Plaintiffs Servet and Fatma Kahraman have sued their mortgage lender, defendant Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (“Countrywide”), in connection with a home mortgage refinancing. The Kahramans have asserted federal, state, and common-law claims against Countrywide for failing to make required disclosures and for misrepresenting their income dur
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge. This appeal by LSB Industries, Inc. and El Dorado Chemical Co. from summary judgment in favor of its insurer, National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (“National Union”), requires us to decide whether the district court erred in determining that the insurance company’s demands for unpaid insurance premiums were not barred by the Okla
Burns v. Bank of Americapublic domain
655 F.Supp.2d 240 (2008) Kevin E. BURNS and Barbara R. Burns, and Renee A. Defina, Plaintiffs, v. BANK OF AMERICA, its affiliates, subsidiaries and agents, including but not limited to Ba Mortgage, Defendants. No. 03 Civ. 1685(RMB)(JCF). United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 4, 2008. *244 Kevin E. Burns, Hackensac
ORDER GERSHON, District Judge: Plaintiff Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) and Karen Kincaid Balmer, Receiver for Defendant Olympia Mortgage Corporation (“Olympia”), submit a Joint Proposed Order and Final Judgment. Fannie Mae and Ms. Balmer (the “Receiver”) seek, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 42(b), to sever the cross-claims asserted by the Receiver against defendants Barry Goldstein (“Gold
United States v. Eganpublic domain
811 F.Supp.2d 829 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, v. Robert EGAN and Bernard McGarry, Defendants. Bank of America, N.A., Clothing Emporium, Inc., Dep't of Veterans Affairs Federal Credit Union, Inserra Supermarkets, Inc., Mahopac Nat'l Bank, MoneyGram Int'l, Inc., Money Spot, Inc., Those Interested Underwriters *830 Who Subscribed to the Policies/Certificates of Insurance Numbered B0702BB008120Y and UM000
Chevron Corp. v. Donzigerpublic domain
*774MEMORANDUM OPINION LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Earlier last year, an Ecuadorian court entered a multibillion dollar judgment (the “Judgment”) against Chevron Corporation (“Chevron”) in an action brought by the 47 Lago Agrio plaintiffs (the “LAPs”), two of whom, Camacho Naranjo and Piaguaje Payaguaje (the “LAP Representatives”), have appeared in
259 B.R. 6 (2001) In re ALL AMERICAN PETROLEUM CORP., Debtor. Neil Ackerman, Chapter 7 Trustee of the Estate of all American Petroleum Corp., Plaintiff, v. Ivan Kovac, I. Kovac Consulting Corp., Rad Energy Corp. f/k/a Rad Oil Co., Inc., all American Fuel, A Division of Rad E Energy Corp., and Stephen S. Draizin, Defendants. No. 896-83672-478. Adversary No. 898-8348-478. United States Bankruptcy Cou
Kaul v. Christiepublic domain
AMENDED OPINION (amending DE 200) KEVIN MCNULTY, United States District Judge *215Dr. Richard A. Kaul, an anesthesiologist by training, claims to be a minimally invasive spine surgeon. In March 2014, the New Jersey State Board of Medical Examiners (the "Board") said otherwise. Because his performance of spine surgeries on 11 patients wit
In Re Pappaspublic domain
277 B.R. 171 (2002) In re Dennis J. PAPPAS, Debtor. No. 096-73437-511. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York. May 7, 2002. *172 *173 Pryor & Mandelup, L.L.P., by Anthony F. Giuliano, Westbury, NY, for John Marshall/Movant. Alan Vinegrad, United States Attorney, by Thomas McFarland,
Fireman's Fund Ins. v. Plant Insulation Co.public domain
ORDER DENYING APPEAL FROM CONFIRMATION OF RESTATED SECOND AMENDED PLAN OF REORGANIZATION RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This case confronts the legal, financial, and logistical challenges posed by reorganization of a debtor under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, when its liabilities include the claims of future victims of asbestos. The debtor in this matter, Plant Insul