Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Rebekah Ann Wilson”
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed October 12, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-19-00580-CV C-HCA, INC D/B/A CLEAR LAKE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, Appellant V. REBEKAH CORNETT AND KALUM CORNETT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF DELANEY CORNETT, Appellees
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
June Med. Servs., LLC v. Geepublic domain
BRIAN A. JACKSON, CHIEF JUDGE Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 22) filed by Defendants, Secretary Rebekah Gee and District Attorney James E. Stewart, Sr., in their official capacities. Plaintiffs filed an opposition to this motion (Doc. 32), to which Defendants replied (Doc. 35). The Court held oral arguments on January 30, 2018. (See Doc. 56). For the following reasons, the motion is GRANTED
Ellen Gayle Moore v. Liberty National Insurance Copublic domain
WILSON, Circuit Judge: Liberty National Life Insurance Company (Liberty National) appeals the district court’s denial of its motion for judgment on the pleadings on plaintiffs’ civil rights claims, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1982. Plaintiffs, a putative class of African Americans that purchased life insurance policies from Liberty National over the last sixty year
250 Kan. 490 (1992) 827 P.2d 758 BANK IV WICHITA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al., Appellants, v. ARN, MULLINS, UNRUH, KUHN & WILSON, a General Partnership, et al., Appellees. No. 66,635 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed February 28, 1992. James D. Oliver, of Foulston & Siefkin, of Wichita, argued the cause, and Mikel L. S
A.N. v. Alamogordo Police Departmentpublic domain
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge. Defendants Keith Daron Syling, Roger Schoolcraft, David Kunihiro and Audra Smith (collectively "Defendants") are officers or employees of the Alamogordo Police Department (APD) who were allegedly responsible for the public release of information regarding the arrest of a juvenile, A.N., in violation of New Mexico law. A.N. and her mother, Katherine Ponder, (coll
Torres v. Statepublic domain
961 S.W.2d 391 (1997) Rebekah Zacarias TORRES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 01-96-00333-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). August 14, 1997. Discretionary Review Refused November 26, 1997. Randy Schaffer, Houston, for Appellant. *392 John B. Holmes, William Delmore, III,
Dowling v. Stapleypublic domain
179 P.3d 960 (2008) Dr. Sandra DOWLING, in her official capacity as Superintendent of Schools, Maricopa County, Arizona, Plaintiff/Appellee-Cross Appellant, v. Don STAPLEY; Fulton Brock; Andrew Kunasek; Mary Rose Wilcox; Max W. Wilson, in their official capacities as Members of the Board of Supervisors, Maricopa County, Arizona, Defendants/Appellants-Cross Appellees. No. 1 CA-CV 06-0503. Court of Appea
Elaine Robinson v. Pfizer, Inc.public domain
ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. Elaine Robinson is one of 64 women from 29 states who sued Pfizer in a Missouri state court, asserting state-law claims that arose from Pfizer’s manufacture and sale of the drug Lipitor, which they allege causes diabetes. Pfizer removed the ease to federal district court, 1 maintaining that the ca
Lichtenstein v. Lichtensteinpublic domain
[Cite as Lichtenstein v. Lichtenstein, 2023-Ohio-3355.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA RYAN LICHTENSTEIN, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : Nos. 111887 and 112340 v. : MELISSA LI
Priest v. United Parcel Servicepublic domain
D. Franklin Arey, III, Judge. The appellant, Rebekah Priest, challenges the Workers’ Compensation Commission’s determination that she sustained a 5% impairment to the body as a whole. This rating is based upon an independent medical evaluation by Dr. Jim Moore. The claimant sought to cross-examine Dr. Moore at the hearing before the Administrative Law Judge pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § ll-9-705(c)(2)(B) (R
In re Parentage of E.A.public domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 123,710 In the Matter of the Parentage of E.A., a Minor Child. No. 125,994 In the Matter of the Adoption of E.A., a Minor Child. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Appellate jurisdiction is defined by statute; the right to appeal is neither a vested nor a
In the Interest of A.E.S.public domain
Hebert, J.: M.S., the father of the minor child A.E.S., appeals from an order entered by the District Court of Douglas County granting temporary custody of A.E.S. to Social and Rehabilitation Services (SRS). M.S. argues that K.S.A. 2011 Supp. 38-2243(f)(3), which allows a court to enter an order of temporary custody in a child in need of care (CINC) case, is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. M.S. also argues that the evide
Duane Belanus v. Phil Clarkpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DUANE RONALD BELANUS, No. 12-35952 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 6:12-cv-00051- DLC PHIL CLARK; RAYMOND POTTER; CORY OLSON; LARRY PLATTS; ALLEN HUGHES; PAT HURLEY; LEO OPINION DUTTON; LEO GALLAGHER; MELISSA BROCH, De
Jacqueline Goldberg v. 401 N. Wabash Venture, L.L.C.public domain
POSNER, Circuit Judge. Trump International Hotel and Tower Chicago (we’ll call it “Trump Tower Chicago” for short) is a 92-story building in downtown Chicago, completed in 2009. It contains 486 residential condominium units, 339 hotel condominium units (occupying floors 14 and 17 through 27 of the building) — the focus of the appeal — plus retail space, a health club, ballrooms,
Schatz Schatz Family v. Giererpublic domain
346 F.3d 1157 The SCHATZ FAMILY, by and through the following persons, both individually and on behalf of the Schatz Family: David SCHATZ; Abigail Schatz, Timothy Schatz, Sarah Schatz; Rachel Schatz; Deborah Schatz, minors and by their Next of Friend, Andy Schatz; Rebekah Schatz; CharitySchatz; Angel Schatz; Jonathan Schatz; Andy Schatz; Joanne Schatz, Appellees,v.Lynne GIERER; Tamme Schroepfer, formerly known as Tamee Bruenderman; Cath
PUNCHBOWL, INC. V. AJ PRESS, LLCpublic domain
FILED FOR PUBLICATION NOV 14 2022 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS PUNCHBOWL, INC., a Delaware No. 21-55881 corporation,
Hinds v. CompAir Kelloggpublic domain
776 F.Supp. 1102 (1991) Rebekah HINDS, Plaintiff, v. COMPAIR KELLOGG, Defendant. No. 3:91-166. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. October 31, 1991. *1103 John Eric Lichtenstein, Bremner, Baber & Janus, Richmond, Va. and Harry A. Wilson, Jr., Wilson & Kehoe, Indianapolis, Ind., for plaintiff.</
Lowry ex rel. Crow v. Watson Chapel School Districtpublic domain
*715 OPINION AND ORDER J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge. This is a civil rights case brought by students and parents of the Watson Chapel School District against the school district, the members of the school board, and two of the school administrators. The plaintiffs have sued the school board members and the two administrators in both their