Cases

Per Curiam: This is an original proceeding in discipline filed by the office of the Disciplinary Administrator against Rebecca D. Brock, an attorney licensed to practice law in the state of Kansas. The matter was heard by the hearing panel on June 6,2000. The panel made the following findings of fact and conclusions of law. “FINDINGS OF FACT “2. The

74 F.3d 1230NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Robert Lee BROCK, a/k/a Two Souls Walker, Plaintiff--Appellant,v.Rebecca SMITH, Honorable Judge, Defendant--Appellee. No. 95-7500. <

791 F.Supp. 721 (1992) Craig McKown BROCK, a minor, by next friend, Edward W. BROCK and Sherry Ray Brock, and Edward W. Brock and Sherry Ray Brock, Individually, Plaintiffs, v. SYNTEX LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant. No. Civ. 4-91-101. United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, Winchester Division. May 19, 1992. Robert S. Peters, Winchester, Tenn., Lawrence B. Clar

FARRIS, Senior Circuit Judge: Marcy Kilgore, Pam Medders, and Vicki Ellis sued their employer, Thompson & Brock Management, Inc., charging sexual harassment in violation of Title VII, as well as the torts of outrage and invasion of privacy under Alabama law. They appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the company. We AFFIRM

11/22/2017 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 6, 2017 Session IN RE: ESTATE OF J. DON BROCK Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals Chancery Court for Hamilton County No. 15-P-245 Jeffrey M. Atherton, Chancellor

ERVIN, Circuit Judge: This appeal challenges the propriety of a preliminary injunction issued by a West Virginia federal district court which directly conflicts with a permanent injunction issued by a federal district court in the District of Columbia.1 Because the West Virginia preliminary injunction reversed the status quo ante litem, forced the defendants to risk contempt in either West

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-SA-00089-COA REBECCA FINLEY APPELLANT v. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT APPELLEE SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/31/2020 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ISADORE W. PATRICK JR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HINDS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, FIRST JUDI

On January 26, 2001, this court suspended the respondent, Rebecca D. Brock, from the practice of law in Kansas for a period of 1 year. See In re Brock, 270 Kan. 635, 17 P.3d 361 (2001). The suspension was made retroactive to January 1, 2000, when the respondent had voluntarily ceased to practice law. Before reinstatement, the respondent was required to pay the costs of the disciplinary action and to resolve any CLE or attorney license fee probl

365 B.R. 201 (2007) In re Gary Dean BROCK, Debtor. No. 05-19362. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas. March 8, 2007. *202 *203 David L. Hiebert, Gragert, Hiebert & Gray, Wichita, KS, for Debtor. MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT E. NUGENT, Chief Judge. The Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 13, 2016 Session IN RE: ESTATE OF J. DON BROCK Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Hamilton County No. 15-P-245 Jeffrey M. Atherton, Chancellor No. E2016-00637-COA-R3-CV-FILED-NOVEMBER 3, 2016 This is an appeal of an order dismissing a will contest for lack of standing. The Con

HAIRE, Judge. The litigation which led to this appeal concerns the rights and obligations of the parties to a contract for the sale of two lots situated near the Colorado River in Yuma County, near Ehrenberg, Arizona. The appellees (buyers) entered into a contract dated February 15, 1965 whereby they agreed to buy from appellants (sellers) parcels no. 33 and no. 34 of the Sour Dough Tract, a plat of which wa

PER CURIAM. Rebecca Lukowsky appeals from an order dismissing her legal malpractice complaint for failure to comply with discovery orders. For the reasons that follow, we reverse. In January, 1988, Lukowsky sued her former attorneys for malpractice. The trial court dismissed that action for failure to attend a pretrial conference. We reversed, holding that the record did not “support a finding that Lukowsky

Derr, District Judge. **849INTRODUCTION This appeal arises from termination proceedings for Joseph C. in the county court for Lincoln County, sitting as a juvenile court. Tina E., the biological aunt and adoptive sister of Joseph's father, appeals the juvenile court's order which held that Joseph's placement with his nonrelat

PER CURIAM. Rebecca Lukowsky appeals the dismissal of her legal malpractice action for failure to appear at a pretrial status conference. The record before us does not support a finding that Lukowsky exhibited a deliberate and contumacious disregard of the trial court’s authority which would warrant the drastic sanction of dismissal. Mercer v. Raine, 443 So.2d 944 (Fla.1983). We reverse and remand to the trial court for

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

OPINION AFTER JURY VERDICT REGARDING INJUNCTIVE RELIEF DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the plaintiffs request for injunctive relief after a trial in which the jury found that there was confusion between the plaintiffs and defendant’s trademarks, but awarded no damages. On June 6, 2013, the jury in this case returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff CFE Racing

LESTER, Chief Judge. This is a petition for review of an opinion of the Workers’ Compensation Board affirming the opinion and award of the Administrative Law Judge. Appellant’s petition involves the following questions of law: (1) whether KRS 342.732(l)(a) concerning awards of Retraining Incentive Benefits (RIB) is constitutional under Section 2 of the Kentucky Constitution in that it denies the employer the right to due pro

KING, JUSTICE, DISSENTING: ¶ 26. Because I believe that an appellate decision in this case is premature, and consequently should remand the case to the circuit court to be properly developed, I respectfully dissent. ¶27. I would allow this matter to proceed in the circuit court, where a full record could be developed. See M.R.A.P. 10(a) (the content of the appellate record “sha

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Blackstone v. Moore, Slip Opinion No. 2018-Ohio-4959.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or o