Cases

Filed 8/3/18 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR DAVID LACAGNINA, Plaintiff and Appellant, A147559 v. (San Mateo County COMPREHEND SYSTEMS, INC. et al. Super. Ct. No. CIV 528251) Defendants and Re

752 F.Supp.2d 246 (2010) Lisa RINDFLEISCH, Tiffany Melendez, Michelle Gentile, Laurie Baker, and Christina Nelmes, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. GENTIVA HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant. No. 10-CV-2111 (JFB) (ARL). United States District Court, E.D. New York. October 8, 2010. *247 Christine

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT ANTHONY J. BATTAGLIA, District Judge. This action arises out of a criminal intrusion into a computer network system used to provide online gaming and Internet connectivity via an individual’s gaming console or personal computer. Plaintiffs, a nationwide putative consumer clas

MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge In September 2011, a thief broke into a ear sitting in a San Antonio parking garage and stole the ear’s GPS system, stereo, and several data tapes. This seemingly run-of-the mill theft has spawned massive litigation. Why? Because of th

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT ANTHONY J. BATTAGLIA, District Judge. Presently before the Court are (1) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Class Action Complaint; and (2) Defendants’ Supplemental Request for Judicial Notice. [Doc. 94.] Plaintiffs filed an opposition, [Doc. No. 107], and Defendants fi

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, District Judge. INTRODUCTION On March 29, 2013, we issued a Memorandum and Order granting in part and denying in part defendants’ motions to dismiss plaintiffs’1 complaints, which alleged that they suffered injury based on the defendants’ manipulation of the London InterBank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). In re LIBOR-Base

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ZAYO GROUP, LLC, : Plaintiff, : : v. : C.A. No. 12874-VCS : LATISYS HOLDINGS, LLC, : : Defendant. : :

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, District Judge. I. Introduction These cases arise out of the alleged manipulation of the London .InterBank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), an interest rate benchmark that has been. called “the world’s most important number.” British Bankers’ Ass’n, BBA LIBOR: The World’s Most Important Number Now Tweets Daily (May 21, 2009), http://www

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 29, 2021. In the Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-19-00397-CV FITZGERALD TRUCK PARTS AND SALES, LLC, Appellant v. ADVANCED FREIGHT DYNAMICS, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 281st District Court Harris County, Texas Trial

02/24/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 8, 2021 Session HCTEC PARTNERS, LLC v. JAMES PRESCOTT CRAWFORD ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Williamson County No. 48722B Michael Binkley, Judge _________________________

ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MARYDALE PRESERVATION ) ASSOCIATES, LLC AND CATHOLIC ) MINISTRY TO THE ELDERLY, INC., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) C.A. No. N19C-05-348 AML CCLD ) LEON N. WEINER & ASSOCIATES, ) INC.; LNW&A CONSTRUCTION ) CORP.; LNWA DEVELOPERS LLC; ) KITCHE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 68A25 Filed 22 May 2026 RELATION INSURANCE, INC. and RELATION INSURANCE SERVICES OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. v. PILOT RISK MANAGEMENT CONSULTING, LLC, PILOT FINANCIAL BROKERAGE, INC. d/b/a PILOT BENEFITS, KYLE SMYTHE, ROBERT CAPPS, LYNETTE KINNEY, EDWARD MILES GURLEY, SEAN KELLY, TYLER CROOKER, MICHELLE LINTHICUM, LINDA MICHELLE SNEED, TONI KING, and JOHN

08/06/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON April 18, 2018 Session CINDY HATFIELD, ET AL. v. ALLENBROOKE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-004249-10 Donna M. Fields, Judge

644 F.Supp.2d 868 (2009) Lynda LYNK, Plaintiff, v. CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC, Defendant. Case No. 07-14772. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. July 29, 2009. Order on Reconsideration August 14, 2009. *871 Rita F. Young, Detroit, MI, for Plaintiff. Joseph A. Doerr, Joseph H. Hicke

*36OPINION OF THE COURT Manzanet-Daniels, J. This case requires us to determine the scope of a party’s duties in the electronic discovery context, and the appropriate sanction for failure to preserve electronically stored information (ESI). We hold that in deciding these questions, the motion court properly invoked the standard for preservation set forth

MEMORANDUM OPINION BARBARA J. HOUSER, Bankruptcy Judge. I. JURISDICTION, VENUE, AND STATUTORY AND CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY.797 A. Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Venue.798 B. Statutory Authority.798 C. Constitutional Authority.800 II. LEGAL ANALYSIS .800 A. Count 1: Breach of the

Reversed and Remanded and Plurality, Concurring, and Dissenting Opinions filed January 24, 2013. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-11-01074-CV KEN HOAGLAND, Appellant V. BILL BUTCHER, KARI BUTCHER, BUTCHER & BUTCHER, AND OCTV PARTNERS, LLC, Appellees On Appeal from the 80th District Court

Schulman, J.** *958After a 10-day trial, a jury ruled in favor of appellant David Lacagnina on his claims *643for fraud, breach of contract, and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing against respondents Comprehe

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0152p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ MICHIGAN FIRST CREDIT UNION, │ Pla