Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
7 opinions for “Raymundo Castaneda”
State v. Castanedapublic domain
715 S.E.2d 290 (2011) STATE of North Carolina v. Raymundo Antonio CASTANEDA, Defendant. No. COA11-7. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. August 16, 2011. *291 Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General K.D. Sturgis, for the State. Duncan B. McCormick, Lillington, for defendant-appellant. HUNTER, Robe
State v. Castanedapublic domain
718 S.E.2d 148 (2011) STATE of North Carolina v. Raymundo Antonio CASTANEDA. No. 404P11. Supreme Court of North Carolina. October 6, 2011. Duncan B. McCormick, Lillington, for Castaneda, Raymundo Antonio. K.D. Sturgis, Assistant Attorney General, for State of N.C. Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of N.C. ORDER
State v. Castanedapublic domain
869 P.2d 234 (1994) 125 Idaho 234 STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Fidelmiro Vargas CASTAÑEDA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 20170. Court of Appeals of Idaho. January 27, 1994. Raymundo G. Pena, Rupert, argued for defendant-appellant. Larry EchoHawk, Atty. Gen.; Michael A. Henderson, Deputy Atty. Gen., Boise, for plaintiff-responden
Garcia v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
534 F.3d 1320 (2008) Adelina GARCIA; Antonio Garcia; Jeronimo Vargas-Vera; Efrain Aguilar; Paulina Aguilar; Adelaida Aguirre; Jose R. Aguirre; Salvador Almanza; Miguel Amaya; Rogelio Andrade; Jesus Anguiano; Efigenia Arana; Jose R. Arana; Ramon Arana; Alma Armendariz; Jorge L. Banda Valadez; Delfino Barragan; Lucia Barragan; Ramon P. Barragan; Holga Benitez; Baltazar Bonilla; Maria Guadalupe Bonilla; Catalina Bustillos; Bernardo Calderon; Etelvina Calder
King v. United Statespublic domain
JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is *928OrdbRed and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Garcia v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
BACHARACH, Circuit Judge. A group of employees filed class and collective actions against Tyson Foods, Inc., seeking unpaid wages for time spent on pre- and post-shift activities. After the employees obtained a sizeable verdict and fee award, 1 Tyson unsuccessfully moved for judgment as a matter of law. On appeal, Tys
Garcia v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Defendants-appellants Tyson Foods, Inc. and Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. (collectively, “Tyson”) appeal from the district court’s interlocutory order denying their motion for partial summary judgment. We ordered the parties to submit briefs addressing whether this appeal should be dismissed on the ground that the order appealed from was not final. Tyson argues that we have jurisdiction over the appeal under