Cases

RAMIREZ, P. J. *204A drug dealer identified only as "Max" owed money to a group of other drug dealers for some methamphetamine that had gone missing. He decided to ambush his creditors, tie them up, rob them of any drugs and money they might have, and kill them. Max delegated the actual commission of these planned crimes to at

PER CURIAM. Defendant-Appellant Jose Antonio Perez (“Perez”), a member of the “Perez Organization,” appeals from the judgment of the district court (Arterton, /.), convicting him on five counts 1 related to the murder-for-hire killing of Theodore Casiano (“Ca-siano”); the leader of a rival narcotics organization in Hart

*421Opinion CORNELL, J. Marta L. Perez was injured when the vehicle in which she was riding was struck by a vehicle driven by Gustavo Davalos Torres. The jury returned a verdict in Perez’s favor. Thereafter, Torres filed a memorandum of costs claiming that he had made a valid offer pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 998 (hereafter section 998)

*385SUMMARY ORDER Defendants-Appellants Wilfredo Perez, Fausto Gonzalez, and Santiago Feliciano appeal from their convictions and sentences on various charges arising out of the 1996 murder-for-hire of Teddy Casiano. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural history of the case. Appellant Perez moved for a new trial on the ground that the

663 F.3d 403 (2011) Barbarito PEREZ-MEJIA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 07-70118. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted February 11, 2011. Filed April 21, 2011. Amended Opinion Filed November 23, 2011. *405 Raul Gomez and Arace

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROSENSTENGEL, District Judge: This case is currently before the Court on the Motion to Remand filed by Plaintiff Sylvia Perez (Doc. 40). Perez brings this wrongful death lawsuit individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of Armando Perez, her deceased husband. Perez claims the decedent was exposed to asbestos while serving in the U.S. Navy, primarily aboard the USS Marylan

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ramon Perez has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Perez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-appellant Abdullah Y. Salahuddin appeals pro se from the February 6, 2006 judgment of the United States District Court of the Southern District of New York (Swain, J.) granting summary judgment to defendants-appellees (the “correctional officers”). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts of the case, its procedural history and the arguments on appeal. Re

976 P.2d 379 (1999) 90 Hawai`i 65 STATE of Hawai`i, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Roman PEREZ, also known as Raymond Perez, Respondent-Appellant. No. 20880. Supreme Court of Hawai`i. February 8, 1999. Reconsideration Denied March 4, 1999. *380 Deborah L. Kim, Deputy Public Defender, on the brief

650 F.3d 350 (2011) Luisa PEREZ; Elvin Francisco Gonza Osovio, Individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MOUNTAIRE FARMS, INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation; Mountaire Farms of Delaware, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants-Appellants, and Ray Barrientos; Maria Gomez; Juana Miguel; Gibran Moya Rivera; Gloria Paneto Castro; Shitwa Perez Lopez; Jose Antonio Santiag Lugo; Maritza Alcover

NO. 07-06-0396-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C JULY 10, 2007 ______________________________ RAYMOND PEREZ, AP

NO. 07-06-0396-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C JULY 10, 2007 ______________________________ RAYMOND PEREZ, APPELLANT V.

People v Perez (2024 NY Slip Op 01994) People v Perez 2024 NY Slip Op 01994 Decided on April 11, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

NO. 07-06-0396-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C JULY 10, 2007 ______________________________ RAYMOND PEREZ, APPELLANT

OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. By decision and order on motion of this Court, dated February 29, 1996, the respondent was suspended from the practice of law, upon a finding that he failed to comply with the lawful demands made upon him in connection with the Grievance *331Committee’s investigation and upon uncontroverted evidence. That order also

People v Perez (2024 NY Slip Op 01994) People v Perez 2024 NY Slip Op 01994 Decided on April 11, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

Opinion issued May 4, 2023 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ——————————— NO. 01-22-00290-CV ——————————— JOY M. PEREZ, Appellant V. JONATHAN L. PEREZ, Appellee

People v Perez (2022 NY Slip Op 00979) People v Perez 2022 NY Slip Op 00979 Decided on February 15, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §

People v Perez (2022 NY Slip Op 00979) People v Perez 2022 NY Slip Op 00979 Decided on February 15, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §

YELVERTON, Judge. For the reasons discussed in the consolidated ease of Dubroc v. Allstate Insurance Co., 633 So.2d 864 (La.App. 3d Cir.1994) (93-780), we find the trial court was correct in granting Sheriff Hilton’s exception of no cause of action. However, the trial judge gave the plaintiffs no opportunity to amend. We accordingly remand to the trial court with the instruction that an order be issued to Connie Per