Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Raymond J. Berg, III”
Jones v. Halvorson-Bergpublic domain
David Jones was injured when he slipped and fell while carrying a window at a construction site. A jury found Flour City Architectural Metals Corporation, a subcontractor, liable for his injuries and awarded damages. Flour City appeals, assigning error to the court's: (1) determination as a matter of law that Mr. Jones was not a loaned servant of Flour City based on lack of consent and control; (2) refusal to instruct the jury that the subcontractor's control over the workplace is an
Berg v. Kellypublic domain
GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge On August 10, 2016, the district court issued an opinion granting in part and denying in part a motion for summary judgment by defendants. The plaintiffs now move for reconsideration of that opinion to the extent it dismissed their purported claim under Monell v. Department of Social Services,
Berg v. Kellypublic domain
Hall, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from an order entered on August 10, 2016, in the Southern District of New York (Griesa, J. ), denying summary judgment in part to Defendants-Appellants Police Officers (the "Officers"), who claimed qualified immunity from suit by Plaintiffs-Appellees, participants in an Occupy Wall Street protest.2 The named protesters assert that the Officers unlawfully de
Berg v. Pulte Home Corp.public domain
Filed 7/30/21 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION * IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (San Joaquin) ---- MICHAEL BERG et al., C086890 Plaintiffs, (Super. Ct. Nos.
Berg v. Johnson & Johnsonpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER KAREN E. SCHREIER, District Judge. Defendants Johnson & Johnson and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. move for summary judgment on all of plaintiffs claims (Docket 149) and also move to exclude the testimony of four of plaintiffs experts (Dockets 140, 143, 145, and 147). Defendant Luzenac America, Inc. joins in the motions (Dockets 151,153, 155, 156,
Keith Raymond v. Avectus Healthcare Solutionspublic domain
OPINION ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. Appellants and purported class plaintiffs, Keith Raymond and Timothy Strunk, were injured in separate accidents and were both treated by Appellee Mercy Health. Even though Raymond and Strunk have health insurance, Mercy Health did not submit their medical bills to their respective health insurance carriers. Instea
Raymond Lumsden v. Statepublic domain
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-16-00366-CR ___________________________ RAYMOND LUMSDEN, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from the 211th District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. F15-1103-211 Before Walker, Meier, and Birdwell, JJ. Opinion by Justice Meier
Davis v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER RAKOFF, District Judge.1 Jury deliberation is currently underway in the above-captioned case, in which plaintiff Evonne Davis sues defendants Philip Morris USA, Inc. and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company for injuries that allegedly resulted from defendants’ tortious conduct. The Court presumes familiarity with the expansive record and procedural histor
Jeffrey Perelman v. Raymond Perelmanpublic domain
OPINION VANASKIE, Circuit Judge. This matter arises under § 502(a)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3), which authorizes suits by, inter alia, a pension plan beneficiary to enjoin any act or practice that violates ERISA, “to obtain other appropriate equitable relief ... to redress such violations,” or
Berg v. N.Y.C. Police Comm'rpublic domain
16‐3146 Berg et al. v. N.Y.C. Police Comm’r et al. 1 In the 2 United States Court of Appeals 3 For the Second Circuit 4 5 6 August Term, 2017 7 8 Argued: October 4, 2017 9 Decided: July 25, 2018 10
Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. v. Phillipspublic domain
PARIENTE, J. Petitioner Raymond James Financial Services required its clients (the investors) to sign an agreement to arbitrate all disputes arising out of the handling of their investments. The issue in this case is not the validity of the arbitration agreement, but rather whether Florida’s statute of limitations that is applicable to a “civil action or proceeding” applies to arbitration proceedings. The investors assert th
219 F.3d 261 (3rd Cir. 2000) RAYMOND A. BERG, JR., APPELLANTV.COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY; ALLEGHENY COUNTY ADULT PROBATION SERVICES; DEBBIE BENTON; RICHARD R. GARDNER; GLENN ALLEN WOLFGANG; GINNY DEMKO No. 98-3557 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT Argued March 10, 1999Filed July 17, 2000 On Appeal
Arthur J. Gallagher & Company v. Clayton Bapublic domain
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: This diversity suit seeks money damages for breach of restrictive employment agreements under Louisiana law, presenting issues of their scope and the measure of damages. I Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (“Gallagher”) provides insurance-related services throughout the country. Its subsidiary,
John Raymond Cross v. Statepublic domain
John Raymond Cross v. Statepublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-09-00052-CR ______________________________ JOHN RAYMOND CROSS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Sixth Judicial District Court Lamar County, Texas Trial Court No. 22783 Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley
482 F.Supp.2d 537 (2007) RHINO ASSOCIATES, L.P., Plaintiff v. BERG MANUFACTURING AND SALES CORPORATION and Cencor Plastics, Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No. 1:04-CV-1611. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. March 29, 2007. *538 *539 *540 Davi
Raymond Professional Group, Inc. v. William A. Pope Co. (In Re Raymond Professional Group, Inc.)public domain
408 B.R. 711 (2009) In re RAYMOND PROFESSIONAL GROUP, INC., et al., Debtors. Raymond Professional Group, Inc., et. al., Plaintiff, Raymond Management Services, Inc. n/k/a Raymond Professional Group-Design/Build, Inc., Co-Plaintiff to Count VI v. William A. Pope Company, Defendant. William A. Pope Company, Counter-Plaintiff as to Count VI v. Raymond Professional Group, Inc. and Raymond Management Services, Inc. n/k/a Raymond Pr
LOKEN, Circuit Judge. Raymond Mahlberg appeals the judgment of the district court 1 entered after a jury rejected his § 1983 claims that Edward Mentzer, a University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL) police officer, violated Mahl-berg’s Fourth Amendment rights in arresting Mahlberg and searching his home. Mahlberg contends that
ACCEPTED 03-15-00293-CV 8312780 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
Raymond v. Pacific Chemicalpublic domain
992 P.2d 517 (1999) 98 Wash.App. 739 Terry RAYMOND, husband, Carmella J. Raymond, his wife, and the marital community comprised thereof, Appellants, v. PACIFIC CHEMICAL, a division of Pace International, L.P.; S/L III, Inc., a Washington corporation; Richard Hunter and Jane Doe Hunter and the marital community comprised thereof; Glen Gay and Karen Gay and the marital community comprised thereof; William Boring and Pam Bori