Cases

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RICHARD D. ROGERS, District Judge. There are three plaintiffs in this case: Brenda Umholtz, Paul Levy and Tina Bruce. Plaintiff Umholtz was the sole plaintiff when this case was originally filed. Plaintiff Levy was added in an amended complaint filed March 2, 2011 and plaintiff Bruce was added in an amended complaint filed April 6, 2011. All three plaintiffs bring claims

Blackwell, Justice. This case presents important questions about the doctrine of sovereign immunity and the constitutional guarantee of the freedom of speech. But before we can resolve those questions, we must consider our jurisdiction of this appeal. The case comes to us as an appeal of right. The appeal is taken, however, from a judgment of a superior court reviewing a decisio

212 F.Supp.2d 790 (2002) David R. NIEBUR and Phillip T. Bue, Plaintiffs, v. TOWN OF CICERO, Betty Loren-Maltese, individually, Merrick Scott Rayle, individually, the Board of Fire, Police, and Public Safety Commissioners of the Town of Cicero, and Clarence Gross, individually, Defendants. No. 98 C 4157. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. May 15, 2002

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0252p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ZACKERY BECK, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellee, │ │

(2008) JOSEPH S. and Steven W.; Disability Advocates, Inc.; and Sidney Hirschfeld, Director, Mental Hygiene Legal Service, Second Judicial Department, Plaintiffs, v. Michael F. HOGAN, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the New York State Office of Mental Health; The New York State Office of Mental Health; Richard F. Daines, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health; The New York State Department

319 F.Supp.2d 814 (2004) Ray HANANIA and Alison Resnick, Plaintiffs, v. Betty LOREN-MALTESE, et al., Defendants. No. 98 C 5232. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 16, 2004. *815 *816 *817 *818<

132 F.Supp.2d 1041 (2001) Michael SZOMJASSY, Plaintiff, v. OHM CORPORATION and International Technology Corporation, Defendants. No. CIV.A.1:98CV3705CAP. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. March 8, 2001. *1042 *1043 *1044 Bruce Ha

The relator is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of New York. It qualified to do business in this state by complying with the provisions of section 1 of article 2 of Act No. 105 of 1898, and it established an office in the city of New Orleans for the transaction of its business. After being legally authorized to do business in this state, it issued a policy in the sum of $10,000 on the life of the plaintiff's deceased husband, in which poli

STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge. This case raises the question of whether a 1907-08 addition to the Navajo Reservation of nearly 1.9 million acres in northwestern New Mexico was terminated by two Executive Orders issued in 1908 and 1911. * The plain tiff-appellant is the Pitts-burg and Midway Coal Mining Company (“

This action was brought by respondents in their own behalf and in behalf of all persons similarly situated, seeking an injunction to restrain appellant, Salmon *Page 6 River Canal Company, Ltd., from delivering water through its canal system to the settlers receiving water therefrom, in a manner and by a method which it is claimed will result in a discrimination in favor of certain settlers and to the injury and detriment of respondent and all other settl

298 F.Supp.2d 1259 (2003) In re: MANAGED CARE LITIGATION This Document Relates to Provider Track Cases No. MDL 1334-MD. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. December 8, 2003. *1260 *1261 *1262 *1263