Cases

Memorandum Opinion and Order GRAY H. MILLER, District Judge. Pending before the court is (1) defendant New Tech Engineering, L.P.’s (“New Tech”) motion for summary judgment on its independent contractor defense and, in the alternative, plaintiffs claim for gross negligence (Dkt. 59); (2) New Tech’s motion for certification of an indemnification issue addressed in the court’s April 15, 2011 order (Dkt. 42)

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 13-821 (Filed: 13 December 2022) * ************************************** INGHAM REG. MED. CENTER, * n/k/a MCLAREN GREATER LANSING, * et al., * * Plaintiffs, * Breach of Contract; Mutual Mistake of Fact;

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT M. DOW, JR., District Judge. Plaintiff Sterling Sawyer claims that he was discriminated against on the basis of his race and gender when he was terminated from his employment at Columbia College (“the College”), and suspended for one calendar year. Plaintiff brings claims against the College for race discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VI of the Civil R

ORDER Troy L. Nunley, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendants Employment Development Department (“EDD”), Richard Rogers and David Derks’s (collectively hereinafter referred to as “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment or, alternatively, Summary Adjudication. (ECF No. 50.) Plaintiff Frank Pinder (“Plaintiff’) opposes Defendants’ motion. (ECF No. 58.) Defend

(2008) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. HOSANNA-TABOR EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH AND SCHOOL, Defendant, and Cheryl Perich, Plaintiff/Intervenor, v. Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School, Defendant. Case No. 07-14124. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. October 23, 2008. OPINION

837 F.Supp. 946 (1993) UNITED STATES of America, and State of Indiana, Plaintiffs, v. SCA SERVICES OF INDIANA, INC., Defendant. SCA SERVICES OF INDIANA, INC., Third-Party Plaintiff, v. OMNISOURCE CORPORATION, et al., Third-Party Defendants. Civ. No. 1:89cv29. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Fort Wayne Division. November 10, 1993.

971 F.Supp. 229 (1997) Charles ROGERS, v. COLUMBIA/HCA OF CENTRAL LOUISIANA, INC., et al. Civil Action No. 96-2839. United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Alexandria Division. June 9, 1997. *230 *231 A. Sale Smith, David A. Johnson, Smith Farrar & Johnson, Ball, LA, for Charles Roge

543 F.Supp.2d 594 (2008) Dr. Sheri L. KLOUDA, Plaintiff, v. SOUTHWESTERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY, et al., Defendants. No. 4:07-CV-161-A. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Fort Worth Division. March 19, 2008. *596 Gary L. Richardson, Richardson Law Firm, Tulsa, OK, for Plaintiff. Roland K. Johnson, Harris Finle

456 F.Supp.2d 1021 (2006) Jackie SAEEMODARAE, Plaintiff, v. MERCY HEALTH SERVICES—Iowa Corp., d/b/a Mercy Medical Center, Defendant. No. C 05-4136-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Western Division. October 5, 2006. *1022 Shelley A. Horak, Horak & Associates, Sioux City, IA, for Plaintiff. Debra Lynne Hulet

961 F.Supp. 960 (1997) Charles ROGERS v. COLUMBIA/HCA OF CENTRAL LOUISIANA, INC., et al. Civil Action No. 96-2839. United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Alexandria Division. February 19, 1997. *961 A. Dale Smith, David A. Johnson, Smith, Farrar & Johnson, Ball, LA, for Plaintiff. Scott Holland Crawford, Crawfor

ORDER LYDON, Judge: In these five consolidated cases, some 95 owners of some 135 tracts of land adjacent to the Ohio River have sued to recover damages which they allege they have incurred, and are continuing to incur, as a result of activities relating to construction and operation of some 7 high-lift dams by the United States Army, Corps of Engineers (Corps). The issues are identical to those raised by

41 F.Supp.2d 249 (1999) Tracy TICALI, Plaintiff, v. ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF BROOKLYN, Saints Peter & Paul Church, E.D., and Teresa Chesnavage, Defendants. No. 96-CV-4667 (ILG). United States District Court, E.D. New York. March 24, 1999. *250 *251 John Houston Pope, Davis Weber & Edw

ALARCON, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-Appellant, Adrian C. Eichman, appeals from two orders of the district court granting summary judgment to Defendant-Appellee, Fotomat Corporation. Eichman appeals from the order of the district court granting Fotomat’s motion for partial summary judgment based on res judicata and the statute of limitations. Eichman also appeals from the subsequen

ALARCON, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-Appellant, Adrian C. Eichman, appeals from two orders of the district court granting summary judgment to Defendant-Appellee, Fotomat Corporation. Eichman appeals from the order of the district court granting Fotomat’s motion for partial summary judgment based on res judicata and the statute of limitations. Eichman also appeals from the subsequen

ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS