Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Ray v. Worden”
Elnesto Ray Valle v. State of Indianapublic domain
OPINION BRADFORD, Judge. As a result of two misbegotten schemes to bail himself out of jail, Appellant-Defendant Elnesto Ray Valle was charged with and convicted of two counts of Class C felony forgery and one count each of Class D felony attempted theft, Class C felony inmate fraud, and Class A misdemeanor resisting law enforcement. The trial court sent
Dennis Ray Smith v. State of Indianapublic domain
OPINION BAKER, Judge. In the instant case, appellant-defendant Dennis Smith claims that his recorded statement to police, during which he admitted to inappropriately touching his stepdaughter, who was about five years old at the time, should not have been admitted into evidence at trial because it was obtained in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the U
State of Or. Ex Rel. Worden v. Drinkwalterpublic domain
700 P.2d 150 (1985) STATE of OREGON, ex rel., Joyce E. Worden, Petitioner and Respondent, v. Ray Harrison DRINKWALTER, Respondent and Appellant. No. 84-321. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs January 31, 1985. Decided May 2, 1985. Rehearing Denied June 11, 1985. *151 Galles & Gunde
Ray v. Statepublic domain
496 N.E.2d 93 (1986) Danny J. RAY, Appellant (Defendant below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff below). Herbert W. Wheeler, Appellant (Defendant below), v. State of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff below). Nos. 4-1083A353, 4-883A292. Court of Appeals of Indiana, Fourth District. July 30, 1986. Rehearings Denied September 25, 1986.
Taxy v. Wordenpublic domain
181 Ill. App.3d 97 (1989) 536 N.E.2d 901 RUTH TAXY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. JULIA WORDEN et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 1-87-0583, 1-87-2333, 1-87-2686 cons. Illinois Appellate Court First District (3rd Division). Opinion filed March 22, 1989. *98 *99 Dav
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY v. JESSE LEE RAY, AS PERSONAL RESPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF DEBORAH L. VEILLEUXpublic domain
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. JESSE LEE RAY, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Deborah L. Veilleux, deceased, Respondent. No. 2D21-1020 September 16, 2022 BY OR
JESSE LEE RAY, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF DEBORAH L. VEILLEUX v. FOWLER WHITE BOGGS, P. A.public domain
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JESSE LEE RAY, as Personal ) Representative of the Estate of ) DEBORAH L. VEILLEUX, Deceased, ) )
Muscoda Bridge Co. v. Worden Allen Co.public domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THE PUBLICATION STATUS OF THIS OPINION IS GOVERNED BY WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(2) AND (3).] [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 23 The following opinions were filed December 8, 1931: The questions upon this appeal
Worden v. Pratt and Whitney Aircraftpublic domain
256 So.2d 209 (1971) Norris E. WORDEN, Petitioner, v. PRATT AND WHITNEY AIRCRAFT et al., Respondents. No. 40921, Industrial Relations Commission Claim No. GG-38927. Supreme Court of Florida. December 1, 1971. Rehearing Denied January 24, 1972. J.J. Goodmark, of Goodmark & Goodmark, West Palm Beach, for petitioner. Paul C. Wolfe, of Jones,
Wilson v. Raypublic domain
Worden, J. Complaint by Wilson against Ray “that on or about the first day of June, 1852, the plaintiff and one Lawrence M. Vance were engaged to perform a large amount of work, and to furnish a large amount of materials for the construction of what is known as the Indianapolis and Cincinnati railroad, in the doing of which work, and the furnishing of which materials, and in order to pa
Worden v. Cannaliatopublic domain
SMYTH, Chief Justice. Cannaliato had registered for him in the Patent Office a trade-mark for hair tonic, a predominant and essential feature of which was the name “X-Ray.” He claimed to have used the mark on his goods- continuously from May, 1913. Appellants, claiming to have adopted the same mark for a like product in 1915, petitioned the commissioner to cancel appellee’s, mark, on the ground that he was not entitled to it, a
Jaquith v. Wordenpublic domain
Gose, J. The plaintiff was run down by an automobile owned by the defendant Worden and driven by the defendant Wade, who was then the agent and servant of Worden. She brought this action, alleging that she met her injury in *351consequence of the concurring negligent acts of all of the defendants. There was a verdict and judgment in her favor, from which all the defendan
265 F.3d 811 (9th Cir. 2001) JULIO ABRAHAM; PAUL AGAZZI; GIUSPPE AIELLO; BENNIE ANSELMO, SR.; THOMAS ARENS; RENATO AVANZINO; LILY BACIGALUPI; PETER BACIGALUPI, JR.; DAVID E. BALLESTRAZZE; MIKE BALLESTRAZZE; WILLIAM BANDETTINI; MARY BARIERI; JOHN BARONI; PIETRO BATTILANA; ANTOINETTE BAVOSO; MICHAEL J. BIAGINI; WILLIAM BIONDINI, SR.; FRANKLIN BISHOP; HERBIE BOYD; MADELINE BRANDI; PAUL BRUNETTA; NATALIO CADEMATORI; FLAVIO CALCAGNO; FERNANDO CAMBRI; RI
Wilson v. Raypublic domain
Gregory, J. Suit by Wilson against Ray. The complaint avers that, on the 1st of June, 1852, the former and one Vance were engaged in the performance of a contract with uThe Indianapolis § Cincinnati Railroad Company,” in furnishing the material and labor in the construction of a portion of her road; that Vance and the appellant were to receive for the labor and materials furn
Beckford v. Droganpublic domain
On En Banc Consideration of Appellee’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees Per Curiam. The appellee moved for attorney’s fees in this paternity action. We grant the ap-pellee’s motion, and as fashioned below, we recede from Gilbertson v. Boggs, 743 So.2d 123 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). We now apply the plain meaning of the first sentence of section 742.045, Florida Statutes (2016), which has remained ide
Beckford v. Droganpublic domain
WARNER, J. A mother timely appeals a non-final order denying her motion for change of venue in an action to determine paternity. The father alleged in his complaint that he resides in Palm Beach County, and venue is proper based on section 742.021(1), Florida Statutes (2016), which permits the filing of a paternity action in the county where the plaintiff or defendant resides. We affirm the order but without prejudice to t
Aldridge v. Statepublic domain
779 N.E.2d 607 (2002) Robert Ray ALDRIDGE, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 39A01-0203-CR-87. Court of Appeals of Indiana. December 9, 2002. Transfer Denied February 20, 2003. *608 Mark Wynn, Madison, IN, Attorney for Appellant. Steve Carter, Attorney General of Indiana, Mi
Lee v. Statepublic domain
689 N.E.2d 435 (1997) Willie Ray LEE, Appellant (Defendant Below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff Below). No. 21S00-9612-CR-00800. Supreme Court of Indiana. December 19, 1997. Rehearing Denied March 30, 1998. *437 Michael Gene Worden, Indianapolis, for Appellant. Jeffrey A. Modisett, Attorney Gen
Mattson v. Montana Power Co.public domain
215 P.3d 675 (2009) 2009 MT 286 Rebecca E. MATTSON, Sliters, North Flathead Lake Yacht Club, J. Michael Dockstader, Ray J. Habel, Greg R. Habel, William G. Bowd, Paul & Mary Sullivan, Ray & Maureen Hein, Randa J. McAlpin, Neil R. McAlpin, Pete C. Woll, Loyd Foster, G.W. Ingham II, Benjamin W. Louden, L. Harry Woll, Kenneth D. Louden, Michel O. Speckert, Steven Speckert, Susie Speckert, Hector Speckert, John Does 1-500, Jan
Harless v. Statepublic domain
577 N.E.2d 245 (1991) Anthony Ray HARLESS, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 18A02-9104-CR-153.[1] Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District. August 28, 1991. *247 Geoffrey A. Rivers, Muncie, for appellant-defendant. Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen., Michael Gene Worden, Deputy Att