Cases

*721DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. #11) IN THEIR ENTIRETY; DEFENDANT’S OBJECTIONS TO SAID JUDICIAL FILING (DOC. #12) OVERRULED; JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT COMMISSIONER, REVERSING COMMISSIONER’S DECISION THAT PLAINTIFF WAS NOT DISABLED WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT, AND REMANDING T

ERICKSON, Circuit Judge. Melvin Russell Twyford, Jr., appeals the district court's 1 judgment upholding the Commissioner of Social Security's ("Commissioner") final decision to deny his applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income ("SSI"). Twyford asserts that the Administrative Law Judge's ("

653 F.Supp.2d 1245 (2009) Johnnie Ray COOK, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. Case No. 6:08-cv-1607-Orl-DAB. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. August 31, 2009. *1247 Edward S. Rue, Luis R. Gracia, Rue & Ziffra, PA, Port Orange, FL, for Plaintiff. Susan R. Waldron, US

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STEPHANIE G., 1 Plaintiff, v. Case No. 22-cv-00904-RMM MARTIN O’MALLEY, 2 Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Stephanie G. brought this action under a provision of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking review of t

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NANCY W.,1 Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 20-cv-2505-MAU KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,2 Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION P

56 F.3d 78NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. James Ray WATSON, Plaintiff-Ap

PER CURIAM. Ray Flener, who applied for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) in 1997 at the age of nine, appeals from the denial of his application for benefits. The administrative law judge (“ALJ”) determined that Ray had oppositional defiant disorder and an unnamed learning disability, but that these impairments neither constitute, nor functionally equal, a listed impairment. Ra

139 F.3d 913 98 CJ C.A.R. 1142 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995,

HANSEN, Circuit Judge. Junior Ray Shelton appeals from the district court’s 1 order affirming the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security to deny disability insurance benefits (DIB) and supplemental security income benefits (SSI). Shelton challenges an administrative law judge’s (ALJ) determination that althou

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KORY D.,1 Plaintiff, Case No.: 1:20-cv-3571-RMM v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI,2 Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Kory D. (“Mr. D.”) brings this action under a provision of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (the “Act”), seeking revi

RALPH G. THOMPSON, District Judge. Claimant Ray Marshall appeals the district court’s affirmance of the decision by the Secretary of Health and Human Services reopening claimant’s March 8, 1988 eligibility determination for blind benefits, terminating his benefits upon a finding that he engaged in substantial gainful activity in 1986, and authorizing recovery of the amounts over

Case: 18-13817 Date Filed: 06/30/2020 Page: 1 of 29 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 18-13817 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:17-cv-01452

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KEVIN TONEY, Plaintiff, v. No. 1:21-cv-00557-ZMF KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Kevin Toney moves to reverse a decision by Defendant Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commi

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) CHARLETHA B. MIDDLETON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) Civil Action No. 16-1596 (EGS) ) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURIT

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Jeffrey Cole, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The plaintiff, Gerald Ray, seeks review of the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying his application for Disability Insurancé Benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 423(d)(2). Mr. Ray asks the court to reverse and remand the Commissioner’s decision, while the Commis

MEMORANDUM OPINION ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge Plaintiff Geraldine Campfield applied to the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) for disability benefits and supplemental security income benefits in 2012, claiming that she was disabled due to

OPINION AND ORDER FEUERSTEIN, District Judge: Pro se Plaintiff Rodolfo Frias (“Plaintiff’ or “Frias”) commenced this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3), seeking judicial review of the final determination of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant” or “Commissioner”) denying Plaintiffs Au*127gust 9, 2012 app

OPINION AND ORDER JAMES L. COTT, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Constance Craig brings this action seeking judicial review of a final determination by Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), denying Craig’s application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and social security income (“SSI”). Craig moved, and the Commissioner cross-moved, for jud

OPINION AND ORDER GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiff Michele Laverne Brooks brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her claim for Social Security Disability benefits under the Social Security Act. The Commissioner has moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant

OPINION AND ORDER GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiff Anthony Heitz brings this action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) challenging the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision to deny his claim for disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act (“SSA”). On October 22, 2015, Heitz moved for judgment on the pleadings. See Notice of Motion for Judgment on t