Cases

ORDER AND JUDGMENT* HENRY, Circuit Judge. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). The ease is, therefore, ordered submitted without oral argument. Jody Ray Alvey, a federal prisoner proceeding pro

ADKINS, J. Petitioners here seek to block a Planned Unit Development (“PUD”) with a Wal-Mart supercenter in Baltimore City, but have been stymied by Circuit Court and appellate rulings against them on the threshold question of standing. Although the test to show standing has been established in Maryland for more than half a century, the issue continues to generate appellate cases. That is partly because the test is fact-sens

LAMBERT, Justice. Upon motion of appellant Gretchen Schmuckie, this Court granted discretionary review. The precise issue before us is whether a maker1 of a promissory note may be discharged from liability as a result of the holder’s impairment of collateral which secures payment of the instrument. Appellees, James N. Alvey and Mary E. Alvey, conveyed a parcel of improved real pr

648 S.W.2d 858 (1983) Dennis Paul ALVEY, Movant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Respondent. Supreme Court of Kentucky. March 30, 1983. *859 Jack E. Farley, Public Advocate, Mark A. Posnansky, Asst. Public Advocate, Frankfort, for movant. Steven L. Beshear, Atty. Gen., Greg Holmes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Frankfort, for respondent.

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-14-00528-CV ____________________ IN RE COMMITMENT OF THOMAS RAY PILGRIM ___________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 435th District Court Montgomer

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Stephens county on a charge of having possession of whisky with intent to barter, sell, give away, and otherwise furnish the same to other persons contrary to law, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $200 and to be imprisoned in the county jail for 30 days. Motion for new trial was filed and overruled and exceptions saved, and the case appealed to this court. When the state offered the evidence pr

This appeal is from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Somerset County. The appellee has filed a motion in this Court to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the bill of exceptions was not prepared and submitted to the judges of the court below within the time prescribed by the rule of that court, or the order of court extending the time for the preparation and submission of the same, and was not submitted to or signed *Page 531 by the judges of

Opinion of the Court by Justice VENTERS. This case arose in the aftermath of the settlement of Darla S. Guard, et' ál. v. American Home Products, Inc. (Guard).1 The Guard case, which is also known as “Jonetta Moore, et al. v. American Home Products, Inc.,” or the “Moore ” case, was brought by Kentucky residents who had taken th

300 S.C. 323 (1989) 387 S.E.2d 698 Lavern T. SIMMONS, Administratrix of the Estate of Shuler Simmons, for the Estate and for herself as statutory beneficiary, Appellant-Respondent v. Thomas R. WILLIAMSON, Respondent, and The County of Charleston, Respondent-Appellant. 1435 Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard November 14, 1989. Deci

942 S.W.2d 904 (1997) TILE HOUSE, INC.; American Bluegrass Marble Co.; Mark A. Shader, d/b/a Roman Tile Company; The Trend Appliance Co., Inc.; Kinnaird & Francke; Cardinal Sanitation, Inc.; and Advance Ready-Mix, Appellants, v. The CUMBERLAND FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK n/k/a Fifth Third Bank; Charles Steier; Cherry Briet Steier; Mark A. Campisano; Dr. Michael Hannigan; Mrs. Michael Hannigan; Kentucky-Indiana Lumber Co., Inc.; K.F.P., Inc. d/b/a Bi

266 P.3d 124 (2011) 246 Or. App. 355 In the Matter of the Compensation of Timothy R. Hanscam, Claimant. SAIF CORPORATION and Elams Home Furnishings, Petitioners, v. Timothy R. HANSCAM, Respondent. 0900239; A144869. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted July 14, 2011. Decided November 2, 2011. David L. Runner, S

SERCOMBE, J. Claimant seeks judicial review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (the board), as supplemented and adhered to on reconsideration, upholding employer’s denial of her combined condition claim involving L5-S1 foraminal stenosis. Specifically, claimant asserts that the board committed “an error of law in finding [a particular doctor’s] opinion persuasive in supporting [that] combined condition denial despi

470 S.W.2d 173 (1971) CITY OF LOUISVILLE et al., Appellants, v. Ray L. McDONALD et al., Appellees. Court of Appeals of Kentucky. April 2, 1971. *174 Eugene H. Alvey, Director of Law, Bernard S. Goldstein, Asst. Director of Law, Louisville, for appellants. James F. Steinfeld, Alex Berman, Louisville, for appellees. REED, Judge. <

BERKLEY ASSURANCE * NO. 2020-CA-0354 COMPANY * VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL * MELISSA WILLIS, AS FOURTH CIRCUIT PARENT/GUARDIAN OF * MACY LEE WILLIS, ET AL. STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* CONSOLIDATED WITH:

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Sep 30 2020, 9:42 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, co

OPINION Patrick A. Pirtle, Justice Appellant, Justin Davis Johnson, was convicted by a jury of aggravated assault causing serious bodily injury with a deadly weapon, a firearm, and aggravated assault by threat with a deadly weapon, a firearm. 1 He was sentenced to twelve years and six years conf

670 S.E.2d 720 (2009) Rhonda HANCOCK-UNDERWOOD, Administrator of the Estate of Melvin Ray Hancock, Deceased v. Richard I. KNIGHT. Record No. 080425. Supreme Court of Virginia. January 16, 2009. *721 Wade T. Anderson (Sean C. Workowski; Frith Anderson & Peake, on briefs), Roanoke, for appellant. Thomas L. Phillips, Jr.,

OPINION SHERRY RADACK, Chief Justice. Plaintiff Wendy Wilkins sued defendant Barbara Marino, M.D., a gynecologist, for negligence and gross negligence, claiming that liposuction procedures Marino performed on Wilkins’ arms and legs left her severely disfigured and that Marino’s postoperative care was deficient. Wilkins timely served both an original and an

WOLLHEIM, J. In this workers’ compensation case, SAIF seeks judicial review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order setting aside SAIF’s denial of responsibility for claimant’s right knee tricompartmental degenerative joint disease. SAIF argues that the Board erred when it assigned responsibility to SAIF under an “exception” to the presumption established in Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Kearns, 70 Or App 583, 690 P2d 10

2007 UT App 266 State of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Michael W. Dennis, Defendant and Appellant. Case No. 20060416-CA. Utah Court of Appeals. Filed August 2, 2007. Samuel S. Bailey, Price, for Appellant. Mark L. Shurtleff and Jeffrey S. Gray, Salt Lake City, for Appellee. Before Judges Bench, Greenwood, and Thorne. OPINION