Cases

The Supreme Court of the State of Colorado 2 East 14th Avenue • Denver, Colorado 80203 2021 CO 8 Supreme Court Case No. 20SA321 Original Proceeding Pursuant to C.A.R. 21 District Court, City and County of Denver, Case No. 19CV34492 Honorable Brian R. Whitney, Judge In Re Plaintiffs: K

07/02/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON May 1, 2024 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. GARY LYNN HART Appeal from the Circuit Court for Chester County No. 21-CR-4 Donald H. Allen, Judge ___________________________________

*409 GILBERTSON, Chief Justice [¶ 1.] Barry Thomas Pith-Hart appeals the circuit court’s order granting 1 summary judgment to defendant Sanford USD Medical Center. Pitt-Hart argues that he commenced his action within the- three-year statute of- l

117 Ga. App. 416 (1968) 160 S.E.2d 633 RAVEN, by Next Friend v. DODD'S AUTO SALES & SERVICE, INC. et al. SISSON, by Next Friend v. DODD'S AUTO SALES & SERVICE, INC. et al. 43134, 43135. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Submitted October 4, 1967. Decided February 29, 1968. Rehearing Denied March 18, 1968.

PER CURIAM: This is a patent infringement action brought by Morpul, Inc., against Glen Raven Knitting Mill, Inc. After reviewing the prior art, the specifications appended to the claim, and the file wrapper history of the patent, the District Court entered summary judgment for defendant, holding that plaintiff was estopped to claim

GORDON, District Judge. Case History The plaintiff, on December 3, 1963, filed a complaint alleging that the defendant by the manufacture and sale .of a combination garment consisting of a pair of ladies’ stockings and underpants unitarily formed was infringing United States Patent No. RE 25,360, a reissue patent owned by the plaintiff by assignment from Tightpat, Inc., and having been issued t

479 P.3d 918In ReKandice RAVEN,

Affirmed by published opinion. Senior Judge MICHAEL wrote the opinion, in which Judge WIDENER joined. Judge KING wrote a dissenting opinion. OPINION MICHAEL, Senior District Judge: Frederick E. Bouchat (the “plaintiff-ap-pellee”) filed this action, seeking $10,000,000 in damages, in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, alleging that the Baltimore Ravens, Inc. and

MORGAN, Senior Circuit Judge: FACTS Plaintiffs/appellees (hereinafter referred to collectively as “Kane”) opened an account with Shearson Loeb Rhodes (hereinafter referred to as “Shearson”), defendant/appellant, in 1979. Defendant/appellant Rheta Raven became Kane’s broker in September 1980. Before that time, Raven had worked as a secretary at Shearson, and Kane knew he was Raven’s first client at Shearso

360 S.W.3d 336 (2012) In re the Matter of: Matthew Aaron SCOBEE, by his next Friend, Kristi ROBERTS, and Kristi Roberts, Individually, Appellant, v. Gail Lynn SCOBEE, Respondent. No. WD 73857. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. March 6, 2012. *340 Michele C. Puckett-Burkhead, for Appellant. Kristen C. Johnson, fo

07/09/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON May 1, 2024 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JUAN DESHAUN HOYLE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 22-650 Donald H. Allen, Judge ___________________________________

Filed 6/28/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE C. ACHAY, Plaintiff and Appellant, G060053 v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2018-01020399) HUNTINGTON BEACH UNION HIGH OPINION SCHOOL DISTRICT,

CLAY D. LAND, CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE Robert V. Gomez, II, Kaitlyn Ann Wille, and Jennifer Price ("Plaintiffs") assert that they were injured when Gomez poured a mixture of diesel and gasoline from a Blitz portable gasoline can onto a mostly extinguished fire and the gas can exploded. Plaintiffs contend that the gas can was defective because it did not have a flame arrestor and did not contain adequate warnings. The gas can

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Danielle Howard Martinez; D. P., a No. 20-56404 minor, by his Guardian ad Litem Erica Wedlow; K. P., a minor, by his D.C. No. Guardian ad Litem Brittany 5:20-cv-01796- Williams; T. W., a minor by his SVW-AFM Guardian ad Litem Dahl Johnson; P. C., a minor by her Guardian ad Litem Raven Campbell; LASHONDA OPINION HUBBARD; AMBER WOOD, Pl

810 F.Supp. 1116 (1993) RIVENDELL FOREST PRODUCTS, LTD., on behalf of itself and a class of all those similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. CANADIAN FOREST PRODUCTS, LTD., Evans Products Co. Ltd., Finlay Forest Industries Ltd., Fletcher Challenge Canada Ltd., Noranda Forest Sales Inc., Northwood Pulp and Timber Ltd., Pope and Talbot Ltd., Proctor & Gamble Cellulose Ltd., Sinclar Enterprises Ltd., Tolko Industries Ltd., Weldwood of Canada Ltd., We

556 F.Supp.2d 858 (2008) BULLARD, et al. v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE RY. CO., et al. No. 07 C 6883. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois. April 10, 2008. Christopher V. Goodpastor, Daniel A. Longoria, James L. Wright, Watts Law Firm, LLP, Austin, TX, for Bullard, et al. Daniel J. Mohan, Raymond Hugo Groble, III, Sean M. Sullivan, William Joseph McF

21-2019 Bartlett v. Baasiri In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2022 No. 21-2019 ROBERT BARTLETT, TERREL CHARLES BARTLETT, LINDA JONES, SHAWN BARTLETT, MAXINE E. CROCKETT, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF RICKY LEON CROCKETT, MARVISE L. CROCKETT, TRACIE ARSIAGA, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT R. ARSIAG

OPINION BY DONOHUE, J.: Appellant, Stefon Johnson (“Johnson”), appeals from the judgment of sentence entered on January 28, 2015 in the Court of Common Pleas, Erie County. Upon review, we find no support for Johnson’s claim that the sentencing court abused its discretion by imposing a sentence that is manifestly excessive. We further conclude that the senten

647 S.E.2d 592 (2007) PETERSON v. The STATE. No. S07A0471. Supreme Court of Georgia. July 13, 2007. *593 Dell Jackson, Atlanta, for Appellant. Paul L. Howard, Jr., Dist. Atty., Elizabeth A. Baker, Asst. Dist. Atty., Bettieanne C. Hart, Asst. Dist. Atty., Thurbert E. Baker, Atty. Gen., Robin Joy Leigh, Asst. Atty. Gen., for

628 F.3d 608 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. Lenin Marks ERAZO, Appellant. No. 10-3012. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued November 9, 2010. Decided January 7, 2011. *609 H. Heather Shaner, appointed by the court, argued the cause for the appellant. Jay Appers