Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Rare Breed Triggers, Inc. v. AS Designs, LLC”
ACCEPTED 15-25-00020-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/17/2025 7:29 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Grunt Style LLC v. TWD, LLCpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 25-1305 & 25-1341 GRUNT STYLE LLC, an Illinois limited liability company, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TWD, LLC, a California limited liability company, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ A
Grunt Style LLC v. TWD, LLCpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 25-1305 & 25-1341 GRUNT STYLE LLC, an Illinois limited liability company, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TWD, LLC, a California limited liability company, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ A
Grunt Style LLC v. TWD, LLCpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 25-1305 & 25-1341 GRUNT STYLE LLC, an Illinois limited liability company, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TWD, LLC, a California limited liability company, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ A
Grunt Style LLC v. TWD, LLCpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 25-1305 & 25-1341 GRUNT STYLE LLC, an Illinois limited liability company, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TWD, LLC, a California limited liability company, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ A
Grunt Style LLC v. TWD, LLCpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 25-1305 & 25-1341 GRUNT STYLE LLC, an Illinois limited liability company, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TWD, LLC, a California limited liability company, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ A
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: GEORGE T. PATTON, JR. ROBERT F. WAGNER BRYAN H. BABB A. RICHARD M. BLAIKLOCK Bose McKinney & Evans, LLP JASON M. LEE Indianapolis, Indiana WANDINI B. RIGGINS Lewis Wagner, LLP Indianapolis, Indiana
Medtech Products Inc. v. RANIR, LLCpublic domain
(2008) MEDTECH PRODUCTS INC., Plaintiff, v. RANIR, LLC and CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Defendants. Medtech Products Inc., Plaintiff, v. DenTek Oral Care, Inc., Kelly M. Kaplan, Ray Duane, and C.D.S. Associates, Inc., Defendants. Medtech Products Inc., Plaintiff, v. Power Products, Inc. d/b/a Splinter, Defendant. Case No. 07-CV-3302 (KMK)(LMS). United States District Court, S.D. New York
West Hills Farms, LLC v. ClassicStar, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOSEPH M. HOOD, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court upon the Motion for Summary Judgment made by Plaintiffs Arbor Farms, LLC, Jaswinder Grover, Monica Grover, MacDonald Stables, LLC, Nelson Breeders, LLC, and West Hills Farms, LLC [DE 482].1 David Plummer, Spencer Plummer, and Strategic Opportunity Solutions, LLC, which did business
ACCEPTED 15-25-00093-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/4/2025 6:01 PM No. 15-25-00093-C
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MACROPHAGE THERAPEUTICS, INC., ) a Delaware corporation, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2019-0137-JRS ) MICHAEL M. GOLDBERG, M.D., and ) M1M2 THERAPEUTICS, INC., ) ) Defendants. )
Abraham v. WPX Production Productions, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER1 JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Class Certification, filed January 13, 2014 (Doe. 116). The Court held a multi-part class certification heating, which took place on: (i) May 8 and 9, 2014; (ii) March 13 and 14, 2014; (iii) June 30, 2014; and (iv) July 14, 2014
ACCEPTED 03-15-00409-CV 8019009 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/30/2015 4:14:06 PM
Coinbase Inc v. SECpublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 23-3202 COINBASE, INC., Petitioner v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION On Petition for Review of Securities and Exchange Commission Order (No. 4-789) _____________________________ Argued on Septem
Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 21-0676 ══════════ Steve Huynh, Individually; Yvonne Huynh, Individually; Huynh Poultry Farm, LLC d/b/a Steve Thi Huynh Poultry Farm d/b/a Huynh Poultry Farm; T & N Poultry Farm, LLC; Thinh Bao Nguyen, Individually; Timmy Huynh Poultry Farm; Timmy Huynh, Individually; and Sanderson Farms, Inc., Petitioners,
Nuness v. Simon & Schuster, Inc.public domain
JEROME B. SIMANDLE, U.S. District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Tyshanna Nuness ("Plaintiff"), filed this law suit against her previous employer, Simon & Schuster, Inc. ("Defendant"), wholly owned by CBS Corporation (collectively "Defendants"), as well as John Does 1-100 and ABC Corps 1-100, alleging racial harassment, constructive discharge, and retaliatory discharge under the New Jersey Law A
Patrick v. Success Acad. Charter Sch., Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM & ORDER Pamela K. Chen, United States District Judge *195Plaintiffs Kim Patrick and her son, AG, bring this action against Defendants, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (" § 1983" or " Section 1983"),
Ideker Farms, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 14-183L (Filed: March 13, 2018)* *Opinion originally filed under seal on February 23, 2018 ) IDEKER FARMS, INC., et al., ) ) Fifth Amendment Taking; Missouri Plaintiffs, ) River; Flooding; Liability; Causation;
Altnor v. Preferred Freezer Services, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge, Table of Contents I. BACKGROUND... 752 II. THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT.. .754 A. The Proposed Settlement Class and Collective... 754 B. The Proposed Settlement Agreement’s Terms... 754 III. DISCUSSION.. .755 A. State Law Class Certificatio
Park Pet Shop, Inc. v. City of Chicagopublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 15-3711 PARK PET SHOP, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court fo