Cases

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT SARASOTA COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT and SARASOTA COUNTY, Petitioners, v. VENICE HMA, LLC, D/B/A VENICE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, SARASOTA DOCTORS HOSPITAL, INC., and ENGLEWOOD COMMUNITY HOSPITAL,

ORDER STEVEN D. MERRYDAY, District Judge. Before 2025 Pasco County must build more and larger roads to accommodate the inevitable increase in automobile traffic. Preferring to avoid the payment of “just compensation” after acquiring the necessary land by eminent domain, Pasco County has hatched a novel and effective but constitutionally problematic idea, a most uncommon regulatory regime that i

567 N.W.2d 578 (1997) 5 Neb. App. 760 Glen BONGE and Evelyn Bonge, Husband and Wife, Appellants, v. COUNTY OF MADISON, Nebraska, Appellee. No. A-96-313. Court of Appeals of Nebraska. June 3, 1997. *580 Charles W. Balsiger, Norfolk, for Appellants. Joseph M. Smith, Madison County Attorney, Madison, f

21 F.3d 1531 Angelique JACKSON and Ethel Musgrove, on behalf ofthemselves and all others similarly situated,Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.OKALOOSA COUNTY, FLORIDA; Don Ware, Bill Peebles, MikeMitchell, Kathie O'Dell, Ferrin Campbell, Jr., in theirofficial capacity as the Board of Commissioners for OkaloosaCounty; James Robbins, Sr., Patrick Carpenter, RubyYoungblood, Claudia Brown King, Pat Thornber, James Hughes,Lee

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: Appellants Jackson and Musgrove appeal the dismissal of their class action complaint against Okaloosa County, Florida and its Commissioners, (the “County”), and the Fort Walton Beach Housing Authority and its members, (the “Authority”), regarding the siting process for a new public housing project. All defendants were sued under the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601 et seq., and the County

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT TAMARA WORLEY, individually; and ) as mother and natural guardian of ) ROCKWELL WORLEY, a minor child; ) as mother and natural guardian of ) MA

734 F.Supp.2d 1262 (2010) SOUND SURGICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. LEONARD A. RUBINSTEIN, M.D., P.A., and Leonard A. Rubinstein, M.D., Defendants. Case No. 8:10-CV-970-T-27MAP. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. August 12, 2010. *1265 Suzanne Barto Hill, Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, PA, Orlando,

MEMORANDUM McLAUGHLIN, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Procedural History. .300 A. Administrative Enforcement Proceedings.300 B. Initial Complaint .301 C. Motion for Summary Judgment. 302 D. Supplemental Complaint.303 E. Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injuncti

635 So.2d 61 (1994) ASPEN-TARPON SPRINGS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, etc., et al., Appellants, v. George STUART, etc., et al., Appellees. No. 92-2814. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. January 18, 1994. *62 Marguerite H. Davis, Daniel C. Brown, and Paul R. Ezatoff, of Katz, Kutter, Haigler, Alderman, Davis & Marks

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING HATCHETT, Circuit Judge: This appeal is from the district court’s dismissal of a lawsuit brought by a physician who was denied the privilege of performing a certain medical procedure at a hospital. The district court found the physician’s complaint insufficient to sustain a lawsuit based on violation of the anti-trust, civil rights,

194 Or. 145 (1952) 241 P.2d 1129 PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. v. CITY OF ESTACADA Supreme Court of Oregon. Argued January 3, 1952. Affirmed as modified March 5, 1952. *146 George L. Hibbard, of Oregon City, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Beattie & Hibbard, of Oregon