Cases

494 F.Supp.2d 873 (2007) AMERICAN COPPER & BRASS, INC., and The Bankrupt Estate of Smith and Wofford Plumbing and Industrial Supply, Inc., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. HALCOR S.A., et al., Defendants. No. 04-2771 DV. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division. May 2, 2007. B.J. Wade, Glassman Edwar

OPINION AND ORDER P.K. HOLMES, III, CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 49), Plaintiff Wendall N. Sampson, Jr.’s response (Doc. 54), Defendants’ reply (Doc." 56), and the parties’ supporting documents. For the reasons set forth herein, Defendants’ mo*878tion for summary judgment -will be grant

Captain Larry Ranells Fort Smith Police Department 100 South 10th Street Fort Smith, Arkansas 72901 Dear Captain Ranells: I am writing in response to your request for an opinion on the propriety of the records custodian's decision in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. Accordingly, this opinion is in issued pursuant to the duty created by A.C.A. § 25-19-105(c)(3(B) (Supp. 2007). Having reviewed the FO

J^EZELL, JUDGE. Darrell Ranel appeals a workers’ compensation judgment holding that he was not entitled to supplemental earnings benefits (SEB). The trial court also refused to award penalties and attorney’s fees for the employer’s failure to approve medical treatment recommended by his treating physician. Additionally, Ranel claims he is entitled to penalties and attorney’s fees for the untimely and unreasonable delay in pa

ACCEPTED 06-15-00013-CV SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 9/16/2015 4:49:55 PM

452 F.Supp.2d 821 (2006) AMERICAN COPPER & BRASS, INC., and The Bankrupt Estate of Smith and Wofford Plumbing and Industrial Supply, Inc., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. MUELLER EUROPE, LTD., et al., Defendants. No. 04-2771 DV. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division. September 13, 2006.

Affirmed and Opinion filed November 3, 2011. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ___________________ NO. 14-10-01126-CV NO. 14-10-01147-CV NO. 14-10-01148-CV ___________________ IHSAN SHANTI, M.D., LARRY LIKOVER, M.D., REHAB ALLIANCE OF TEXAS, INC., D/B/A STEEPLECHASE FAMILY HEALT

[Cite as State ex rel. Internatl. Assn. of Fire Fighters v. Barbish, 2024-Ohio-3148.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO ex rel. CASE NO. 2021-L-103 THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE FIGHTERS, LOCAL 1536, AFL-CIO, Civil Appeal from the

356 S.W.3d 705 (2011) Ihsan SHANTI, M.D., Larry Likover, M.D., Rehab Alliance of Texas, Inc., d/b/a Steeplechase Family Healthcare and Steeplechase Pain Management & Surgical Associates, Sheila Smith, f/n/a Sheila Goyer, Dennis Smith, D.C., and Karl Covington, M.D., Appellants, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Allstate Indemnity Company, Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Company, Allstate County Mutual Insurance Company, and Allstate F

57 F.Supp.2d 791 (1999) Michael F. DeROCHE, Plaintiff, v. ALL AMERICAN BOTTLING CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant. No. Civ. 98-675 (JRT/RLE). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. May 10, 1999. *792 *793 Mark Leslie Knutson, Lisa Danelle Wilson, Bye, Agnew, Dryer & Stora

LAY, Circuit Judge. Best Buy Co., Inc. (Best Buy) appeals the district court’s denial of damages in its breach of contract suit against Fedders North America, Inc. (Fedders). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. I. Background Best Buy, a Minnesota corporation, is a retail operation that sells a variety of household goo

907 S.W.2d 430 (1995) STATE FARM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and Ted H. Heaton, III, Petitioners, v. Terri BEASTON, Respondent. No. D-4454. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued May 5, 1994. Delivered June 29, 1995. Rehearing Overruled October 27, 1995. *431 Larry G. Black and Ranelle M. Meroney, Austin, for

Opinion issued April 16, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00602-CV ——————————— GARY HORNDESKI M.D., Appellant V. CHERYL PRICE, Appe

660 F.Supp. 1048 (1986) Ralph BAILEY, Plaintiff, v. CONTAINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Defendant. Civ. A. No. C-1-84-878. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, W.D. January 23, 1986. *1049 *1050 James B. Helmer, Jr., Cincinnati, Ohio, for Ralph Bailey. James A. Moore, Lindhorst &

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-12-00188-CR JENNIFER BANNER WOLFE APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE ---------- FROM THE 213TH DISTRICT COURT

718 P.2d 456 (1986) Penny A. HAZEN, Appellant, and Cross-Appellee, v. MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE, Richard Stevens, William L. Casto, Tim Kasper, Michael Grimes, and Allen Bailey, Appellees, and Cross-Appellants. Nos. S-477, S-567. Supreme Court of Alaska. April 25, 1986. As Amended July 31, 1986. *457 Walter Share

OPINION *Page 2 {¶ 1} Defendants the Jackson Township Board of Trustees and Chief Harley Neftzer, and separately, defendant Bruce Wilson, appeal a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Stark County, Ohio, entered on a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff-appellee Pamela Denczak Henderhan. Appellants The Board and Neftzer assign seven errors to the trial court:

OPINION Alcala, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. In this opinion, we address whether expert testimony on the subject of abusive head trauma is reliable. Jennifer Banner Wolfe, appellant, presents this issue in her petition for discretionary review following her conviction in a bench trial for first-degree-felony injury to a child after an infant under her care sustained ser

— Judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Burton B. Roberts, J.), rendered May 12, 1986, convicting defendant on a plea of guilty of robbery in the first degree, burglary in the first degree, criminal use of a firearm in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, criminal mischief in the fourth degree and grand larceny in the third degree, and sentencing defendant to indeterminate terms of from 3 to 9 years’ imprisonment on his convictions for robb

Plaintiff below, Delores Williams, sued defendant below to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by reason of a defective shoe which she purchased from defendant in June of 1978. After a jury verdict, judgment was entered for plaintiff in the amount of $2,150; she (plaintiff) brings this appeal on two points of error. First, she urges the damages should have been trebled as required by Woods v. Littleton, 554 S.W.2d 662