Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CLARENCE E. BALDWIN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 16-1365 (RDM) SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Pro se complaints are “‘held to less stringent [pleading] standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers

60 F.3d 825NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Randolph BALDWIN, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Cassandra BALDWIN, Defe

563 F.3d 490 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. Venus D. BALDWIN, Also Known as Talisha Johnson, Appellant. No. 05-3174. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued November 18, 2008. Decided April 21, 2009. Howard B. Katzoff, appointed by the court, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant. Suzan

BYRD, J. The only question involved in these cases is, whether a judgment rendered by the county court of Montgomery county, in 1862, is valid. The counsel for appellants contend, that the judge of that court was not elected by the people to fill the office created by the act of the 24th February, 1860, and that therefore the judgments rendered by him are void, and reversible on appeal.—Pamph. Acts, 564. To sustain this position

[Cite as Mannogg v. Randolph, 2019-Ohio-693.] COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PHILIP M. MANOGG JUDGES: Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J Plaintiff – Appellant Hon. John W. Wise, J. Hon. Craig R. Baldwin, J. -vs-

*845 TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge. Randolph Wilhelm filed this case, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming damages resulting from the interruption of his employment as a Milwaukee, Wisconsin, County park worker. The district court granted the County’s motion for summary judgment on the basis of claim

627 N.E.2d 1228 (1994) 256 Ill. App.3d 536 194 Ill.Dec. 586 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlyle BALDWIN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 2-92-0697. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. January 27, 1994. *1229 G. Joseph Weller, Deputy Defender, Thoma

Rel: June 14, 2024 STATE OF ALABAMA -- JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT THE SUPREME COURT OCTOBER TERM, 2023-2024 SC-2023-0523 Randolph Clay Cooper and Lisa Straka Cooper v. Rebecca Cooper Bonner, individually, in her capacity as trustee of the Nolan P. Cooper, Jr., Unified Credit Trust, and in her capacity as successor trustee of the Carol Evans Cooper Revocable Living Trust; David Bonner; and Garland Terrance Cooper (Appeal from Baldwin Circuit

570 F.3d 922 (2009) Willie POLE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Austin RANDOLPH, Acting Warden of Logan Correctional Center, Respondent-Appellee. Nos. 06-2768, 06-3281. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued September 21, 2007. Decided July 7, 2009. *926 Jerold S. Solovy, Attorney, Kathryn C. Newman (a

MEMORANDUM OPINION PAUL W. GRIMM, District Judge. Plaintiffs bring this collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and the Maryland Wage and Hour Law (“MWHL”), alleging that they worked in excess of forty hours per week as traffic controllers for Defendant Power-Comm Construction, Inc. (“PowerComm”) but were not paid sufficient overtime wages. Defendants have moved for summary

BALDWIN, Judge. This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences (board) awarding priority to Shoberg et al. (Shoberg), the senior party. We reverse. Background Shoberg was issued U.S. patent No. 3,938,603 entitled “Constant Moment Weigh Scale With Floating Flexure Beam” on February 17, 1976, on an application filed December 30, 1974. Randolph, the junio

634 F.Supp.2d 779 (2009) Tina M. RANDOLPH, Plaintiff, v. DIMENSION FILMS et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. H-08-1836. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. June 29, 2009. *784 Leslie W.M. Adams, Attorney at Law, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff. Tanya Lynn Chaney, Locke Lord Bissell and Liddell LLP, Hous

205 P.3d 871 (2009) 346 Or. 67 George Edward FARMER, Petitioner, v. George H. BALDWIN, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution, Respondent. (USDC CV 02-1565-ALA; USCA 06-35635; SC S055187). Supreme Court of Oregon, En Banc. Argued and Submitted June 4, 2008. Decided March 26, 2009.

Blackburn, Presiding Judge, dissenting. Despite the binding authority of the United States Supreme Court’s holding in United States v. Matlock,38 and the persuasive authority of our federal courts interpreting Matlock, both the majority opinion and the special concurrences establish a contrary rule for Fourth Amendment issues in Georgia regarding consent searches to t

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Nos. 06-2768 & 06-3281 W ILLIE P OLE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. A USTIN R ANDOLPH, Acting Warden of Logan Correctional Center, Respondent-Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eas

ORDER KRISTI K. DuBOSE, District Judge. This action is before the Court on the motion for judgment on the pleadings filed by defendants Baldwin County Board of Education, Superintendent Dr. Alan T. Lee, Board President Norman Moore, Board Vice President Robert Callahan, Jr., Board Member David Cox, Board Member David Tarwater, Board Member Elmer McDaniel, Board Member Angie Swiger, Board Memb

In the Iowa Supreme Court No. 24–1645 Submitted January 20, 2026—Filed May 22, 2026 Rhonda Baldwin, as executor of the Estate of Garrett O. Baldwin, Appellee, vs. Central Iowa Hospital Corp., d/b/a Iowa Methodist Medical Center, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for P

852 So.2d 547 (2002) Jamie RANDOLPH a/k/a Jamie Estus Randolph v. STATE of Mississippi. No. 1999-KA-02119-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. January 10, 2002. Rehearing Denied November 21, 2002. *551 Clifton S. Gaddis, Jeffrey Loewer Hall, Hattiesburg, Attorneys for Appellant. Office of the Attorney Genera

Per Curiam: The trial judge was without authority to amend or modify the earlier order of the trial court to include an award of *302attorney fees. The decretal paragraph of the order did not expressly award attorney fees, and the judge’s authority to amend the judgment ended with the expiration of the term of court during which the judgment was rendered, e

Rel: December 22, 2022 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is printed in Southern Reporter. SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA OCTOBER TER