Cases

Hamilton App. No. C-130527. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal. Upon review of the motion for stay of the court of appeals’ judgment, it is ordered by the court that appellee shall file a response, if any, to the motion for stay no later than Monday, June 30, 2014.

Hamilton App. No. C-130527. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for stay of the court of appeals’ judgment, it is ordered by the court that the motion is denied. O’Donnell, Kennedy, and O’Neill, JJ., dissent and would grant the stay and continue the bond.

[Cite as Randall v. Randall, 2013-Ohio-707.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO LAURA S. RANDALL, : APPEAL NO. C-120264 TRIAL NO. DR-0400504 Plaintiff-Appellee, : O P I N I O N. vs.

22 A.3d 1166 (2011) Elton B. RANDALL, Jr. v. Deborah RANDALL, alias, Executrix of the Will of Esther A. Randall, alias, resident decedent of Warwick, Rhode Island. No. 2009-229-Appeal. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. June 24, 2011. *1167 Elton B. Randall, Jr., pro se. Sidney W. Paull, Esq., for Defendant. Present: SU

ALTENBERND, Judge. Katharine Randall, the Former Wife, appeals from a final judgment of dissolution of her marriage to the Former Husband, Steven Randall. We agree with the Former Wife that the trial court erred in requiring her to return her engagement ring to the Former Husband after he had listed the ring as her nonmarital property. Accordingly, we reverse that portion of the judgment requiring the Former Wife to return t

WELLS, Judge. Kristina Randall appeals from an order finding her in indirect civil contempt, discharging a contempt order previously entered against her former husband, Stephen Randall, and changing the terms of an earlier order as to the sale of certain property. We reverse this order in all respects. In June of 2002, the parties’ thirty year marriage was dissolved by a final judgment of dissolution of m

930 So.2d 840 (2006) Stephen RANDALL a/k/a Steven Randall, Appellant, v. Kristina RANDALL, Appellee. No. 3D04-2932. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. June 14, 2006. Kendra Faulkner Shaw and Daniel Kaplan, Aventura, for appellant. Patterson & Sweeny and John H. Patterson, Jr., Miami, for appellee. *84

875 So.2d 667 (2004) Stephen RANDALL a/k/a Steven Randall, Appellant, v. Kristina RANDALL, Appellee. No. 03-1016. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. April 14, 2004. Rehearing Denied June 16, 2004. Daniel Kaplan, Aventura, for appellant. Patterson & Sweeny, and John H. Patterson, Jr., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Gainsborg v. Gainsborg, 362 So.2d 1028 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

—In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Lynaugh, J.), entered August 23, 2002, which granted the father’s motion to dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to Domestic Relations Law article 5-A. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. The parties’ son, Darley Talbot Randall III, was born on

Garley, Justice. Cathy Randall moved the trial court to hold her former husband, Stanley Randall, in contempt, alleging that he had failed to comply with the financial obligations of the final divorce decree dissolving the marriage between the parties. On several occasions, counsel for both parties agreed to a hearing date, but each time the hearing did not take place due to a scheduling conflict. Eventually, Ms. Randall’s <

OPINION {¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant Patricia L. Randall (n/k/a Lavy)1 appeals a decision of the Darke County Court of Common Pleas adopting a decision of the magistrate which overruled her motion to show cause why defendant-appellee William M. Randall should not be held in *Page 2 contempt for failing to pay one-half of

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 50602 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) Filed: September 24, 2024 Plaintiff-Respondent, ) ) Melanie Gagnepain, Clerk v. ) ) DAVID LAWRENCE RANDAL

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opinion. In the Supreme Cou

[Cite as State v. Randall, 2022-Ohio-2467.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TRUMBULL COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 2022-T-0009 Plaintiff-Appellee, Criminal Appeal from the -v- Court of Common Pleas MARK O. RANDALL,

Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 23-0041 ══════════ Albertsons, LLC d/b/a Randall’s; Albertsons Companies, LLC d/b/a Randall’s; Randall’s Food Markets, Inc. d/b/a Randall’s; and Randall’s Food & Drugs LP d/b/a Randall’s, Petitioners, v. Maryam Mohammadi, Respondent

251 Argued and submitted January 5, reversed February 15, 2023 Shantelle RANDALL, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Marki VALK and all others, Defendant-Appellant. Linn County Circuit Court 22LT01290; A178118 525 P3d 889 Tenant appeals from a gen

235 Wis.2d 1 (2000) 2000 WI App 98 612 N.W.2d 737 IN RE the MARRIAGE OF: Elizabeth A. RANDALL, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Jerome L. RANDALL, Respondent-Appellant. No. 99-0531. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs September 10, 1999. Decided March 2, 2000. *4</

Vazquez v Randall (2022 NY Slip Op 03187) Vazquez v Randall 2022 NY Slip Op 03187 Decided on May 12, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

2022 IL App (1st) 210846 No. 1-21-0846 Opinion filed September 8, 2022 Fourth Division ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS