⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

18 opinions for “Randall Lewis Pullen”

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016-04-21 · Published · cited 1× · 820 F.3d 730; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 7269; 2016 WL 1612753
Case: 14-51343 Document: 00513475700 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/21/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 14-51343 United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED
Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2007-05-15 · Published · cited 1× · 733 N.W.2d 578; 15 Neb. Ct. App. 538; 2007 Neb. App. LEXIS 86
733 N.W.2d 578 (2007) 15 Neb. App. 538 Robert Lewis HERTZEL III, by and Through Robin JOPLIN, his Mother and next best friend, appellant, v. The PALMYRA SCHOOL DISTRICT, District OR1, appellee. No. A-05-711. Court of Appeals of Nebraska. May 15, 2007. *581 Mark T. Bestul and Vincent M. Powers, of Vincent M
Lawson v. Lewispublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 1949-04-13 · Published · cited 14× · 52 S.E.2d 859; 205 Ga. 227; 1949 Ga. LEXIS 334
1. "When a grantee accepts a deed and enters thereunder, he will be bound by the covenants contained therein, although the deed has not been signed by him." Code, § 29-102; Atlanta, Knoxville Northern Ry. Co. v. McKinney, 124 Ga. 929 (53 S.E. 701, 6 L.R.A. (N.S.) 436, 110 Am. St. R. 215); Union City Realty Co. v. Wright, 138 Ga. 703
California Court of Appeal · 2007-03-08 · Published · cited 0× · 55 Cal. Rptr. 3d 777; 148 Cal. App. 4th 460
55 Cal.Rptr.3d 777 (2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 460 Paul KOURI et al., Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF the STATE of California for the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Respondent. BDO Seidman, LLP, Real Party in Interest. No. B189876. Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Eight. March 8, 2007. *778
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-10-07 · Published · cited 0× · 2021 NY Slip Op 05388
Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2021 NY Slip Op 05388) BODY { font-family : "Times New Roman", Times, serif; font-size : larger; } P { line-height: 150%; text-indent: 2em } Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law  468-a
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018-07-13 · Published · cited 0×
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1582 JIHAD ADBUL-MUMIT; MATTHEW ABEDI; MONICA ADAIR SARGENT; MARK AGEE; ALIZ AGOSTON; YVONNE ALSTON; DAN AMATRUDA; KRISTY AMBROSE; KIMBERLEY AMICK; WANDA G. AMOS; CHRISTOPHER ARAUZA; CARL ARSENAULT; BROOKE ASHER; MICHELLE ATKINS; RAYMOND O. ATKINS; MATTHEW ATWELL; DAVID AUB; SOHA AYYASH; ASIF AZIZ; SUSAN BAILEY; KAREN BAKER; HAB BA
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1995-05-26 · Published · cited 3× · 183 B.R. 206; 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 765; 27 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 444; 1995 WL 351649
183 B.R. 206 (1995) In re MADISON ASSOCIATES, fka Pannell Kerr Forster, a general partnership, Debtor. MADISON ASSOCIATES, Official Creditors Committee of the Estate of Madison Associates, and United Jersey Bank and Allstate Municipal Income Opportunities Trusts II and III, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. John BALDANTE, et al., (Former Partners of Madison Associates), Marc Abrams, Robert W. Adams, Joseph
Davidson v. Rogerspublic domain
Oregon Supreme Court · 1978-02-08 · Published · cited 17× · 574 P.2d 624; 281 Or. 219; 3 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2030; 1978 Ore. LEXIS 728
574 P.2d 624 (1978) 281 Or. 219 Fred DAVIDSON, Appellant, v. Brian S. ROGERS, Dba Eugene Magazine, and Cameron Stauth, Respondents. Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc. Argued and Submitted November 4, 1977. Decided February 8, 1978. William F. Frye of Frye, Speer & Smith, Eugene, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant. Rand
Supreme Court of the United States · 1979-02-28 · Published · cited 571× · 59 L. Ed. 2d 261; 99 S. Ct. 1067; 440 U.S. 205; 1979 U.S. LEXIS 29
440 U.S. 205 (1979) GROUP LIFE & HEALTH INSURANCE CO., AKA BLUE SHIELD OF TEXAS, ET AL. v. ROYAL DRUG CO., INC., DBA ROYAL PHARMACY OF CASTLE HILLS, ET AL. No. 77-952. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 11, 1978. Decided February 27, 1979. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2012-05-29 · Published · cited 248× · 368 S.W.3d 371; 2012 WL 4800459; 2012 Tenn. LEXIS 377
OPINION GARY R. WADE, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which CORNELIA A. CLARK, C.J., JANICE M. HOLDER, WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., and SHARON G. LEE, JJ., joined. The defendant, tried and convicted of two counts of first degree murder, was sentenced to death for each offense. The Court of Criminal Ap
Leathers v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937-12-10 · Published · cited 8× · 74 P.2d 967; 63 Okla. Crim. 220; 1937 OK CR 186; 114 A.L.R. 114; 1937 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 181
The defendant was charged with the crime of selling intoxicating liquor to a minor, was tried, convicted, and sentenced by the court to pay a fine of $300 and to serve a term of three months in jail, and has appealed. The facts revealed by the evidence of the state are that the prosecuting witness, Bettie Lou Reed, is a little girl, nine years of age. She was living with her grandmother in Oklahoma City, near where the defendant lived and owned and operated a store. On Monday, August 3
Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978-11-13 · Published · cited 191× · 365 So. 2d 471
365 So.2d 471 (1978) Theotis Fontenot LeJEUNE et al., Plaintiffs-Relators, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO. et al., Defendants-Respondents. No. 61748. Supreme Court of Louisiana. November 13, 1978. Rehearings Denied December 14, 1978. *472 Guillory, McGee & Mayeux, Robert K. Guillory, Eunice, Fuselier, Pucheu &
Lane v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938-11-03 · Published · cited 23× · 84 P.2d 807; 65 Okla. Crim. 192; 1938 OK CR 107; 1938 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 98
The defendant was charged in the district court of Osage county with the crime of assault with a dangerous weapon, was convicted and sentenced to serve a term of two years in the penitentiary, and has appealed. The first assignment of error is that the court erred in giving instruction No. 10, which is as follows: "You are instructed that if you find from the evidence, facts and circumstances in proof, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant herein armed himself for the pu
Lepley v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940-06-06 · Published · cited 0× · 103 P.2d 568; 69 Okla. Crim. 379; 1940 OK CR 75; 146 A.L.R. 1323; 1940 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 52
Defendant, Jack Lepley, was charged in the county court of Carter county with the crime of "interference with standing vehicle"; was tried, convicted, and the court assessed his punishment at a fine of $100 and costs, and a jail sentence of 30 days. Four separate propositions are submitted by the defendant for reversal of this case. We are of the opinion that they may be disposed of by considering them together, and it will not be necessary to consider each separately. For this purpose
Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913-02-15 · Published · cited 12× · 155 S.W. 309; 1913 Tex. App. LEXIS 362
This is an action by appellee for damages, growing out of the shipment of live stock from Happy, Tex., to Kansas City, Mo. Appellee alleged, in substance, that on August 20, 1910, the defendant railway company received from plaintiff for transportation from Happy, Tex., by it and its connecting carriers, to Kansas City, Mo., about 235 beef cattle, for which defendant issued three receipts or bills of lading, one in the name of E. F. Brown, one in the name of appellee, and the other in the nam
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-11-30 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00409-CV 8019009 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/30/2015 4:14:06 PM
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018-07-13 · Published · cited 126× · 896 F.3d 278
THACKER, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises from the dismissal of three consumer actions based on Virginia state law claims. The actions focus on a series of misrepresentations made by Hyundai Motor America ("Hyundai") regarding the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") estimated fuel economy for the 2011, 2012, and 2013 models of the Hyundai Elantra. A Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("JPML") consolidated dozens of si
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2015-09-04 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 12-14-00220-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/4/2015 3:01:53 PM