Cases

fIn the United States Court of Federal Claims RUSSELL L. BACON, et al., Plaintiffs, No. 22-1724 v. (Filed: January 27, 2025) THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. Meghan S. Largent, Lindsay S.C. Brinton, T. Hunter Brown, Lewis Rice, LLC, St. Louis, Missouri, for Plaintiffs. Daniel Pinkston, Senior Trial Attorney, Denver, Colorado, Todd Kim, Assi

Cite as 2025 Ark. App. 207 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION I No. CR-24-260 RANDALL MCARTY Opinion Delivered April 9, 2025 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE CLARK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V.

OPINION AND ORDER RAKOFF, District Judge.1 Jury deliberation is currently underway in the above-captioned case, in which plaintiff Evonne Davis sues defendants Philip Morris USA, Inc. and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company for injuries that allegedly resulted from defendants’ tortious conduct. The Court presumes familiarity with the expansive record and procedural histor

PER CURIAM: The heirs of Howard Green sued several tobacco manufacturers and H.E.B. Butt Grocery Company (“H.E.B.”) in Texas state court for Green’s wrongful death. The defendants removed the case to federal court, which remanded. The defendants removed a second time, citing new evidence and a decision in an unrelated case, and the Greens sought remand. The district court denied

181 F.Supp.2d 1256 (2002) David BURTON, Plaintiff, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO. et al., Defendants. No. 94-2202-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. January 8, 2002. *1257 *1258 Kenneth B. McClain, Nicholas E. Mebruer, Nimrod T. Chapel, Jr., Donald H. Loudon, Jr., Scott B. Hall, Humph

208 F.Supp.2d 1187 (2002) David BURTON, Plaintiff, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Case No. 94-2202-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. May 9, 2002. *1188 *1189 *1190 Kenneth B. McClain, Nicholas E. Mebruer, Nimrod T. Chapel,

453 B.R. 132 (2011) In re GSC, INC., et al., Debtors.[1] No. 10-14653 (AJG). United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. July 18, 2011. *138 Shearman & Sterling LLP, By: Andrew V. Tenzer, Esq., William J.F. Roll, III, Esq., Susan A. Fennessey, Esq., Randall L. Martin, Esq., New York, NY, for Chapter 11 Trustee, James L.

294 S.W.3d 357 (2009) SMITH SERVICES, a business unit of Smith International, Inc., f/k/a Smith Co., Appellant v. GRINNELL CORPORATION, Appellee. No. 07-08-0140-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Amarillo, Panel C. August 13, 2009. *358 L. Keith Slade, Leigh M. Lewis and Christopher Peirce, Tucker, Taunton, Snyder & Slade, P.C.,

Case Number: 03-05-00430-CV 04/30/2009 Case stored in record room 04/17/2009 Notice received 04/15/2009 Call received 02/25/2009 Second m/e/t to file petition for review disposed Granted 02/24/2009 Second m/e/t to file petition for review filed 01/23/2009 M/E/T to file petition for review filed 01/23/2009 M/E/T to file petition for review disposed Granted [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

I cannot agree that a piece of paper purporting to be the final judgment in a criminal case, signed by a magistrate and not the district court judge, constitutes a final judgment of the Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas County, Texas. Consequently, I respectfully dissent. In his third point of error, appellant contends that the trial court committed reversible error by permitting the jury to consider the second paragraph in the indictment because the conviction set out in

742 F.Supp.2d 1121 (2010) Sheri Gail DURHAM, individually and as next of friend of Marisa Uma Lama Durham, Minor et al., Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF MAUI, et al., Defendants. No. CIV 08-00342 JMS/LEK. United States District Court, D. Hawai`i. August 31, 2010. *1123 Kenneth B. Chaiken, Robert L. Chaiken, Chaiken & Chaiken, PC, Le

The opinion of the court was delivered by Ross, J. The amount tendered the plaintiffs by the defendant was sufficient to cover the sum found due them at that time by the auditor, unless they have the right to add the expense of the writ in this suit. The plaintiff's had sued out the writ and placed it in the officer’s hands for service, but the same had not been served at the time the tender was made. The statut

202 Ga. App. 541 (1992) 414 S.E.2d 744 RANDALL MEMORIAL MORTUARY, INC. et al. v. O'QUINN. A91A1479. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided January 22, 1992. William C. Randall, for appellants. Martin, Snow, Grant & Napier, Phillip A. Sibley, Joseph E. Williams, Jr., for appellee. COOPER, Judge. On November

777 P.2d 483 (1989) Gregory CALDWELL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. FORD, BACON & DAVIS UTAH, INC., a Utah corporation, Defendant and Appellee. No. 20246. Supreme Court of Utah. July 31, 1989. Joseph E. Hatch, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and appellant. Randall S. Feil, Brent P. Lorimer, Salt Lake City, for defendant and appellee. ZIMMERMAN, Justice

696 F.Supp.2d 1150 (2010) Sheri Gail DURHAM, Individually and as next of Friend of Marisa Uma Lama Durham, Minor et al., Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF MAUI, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. 08-00342 JMS/LEK. United States District Court, D. Hawai`i. February 12, 2010. Kenneth B. Chaiken, Robert L. Chaiken, Chaiken & Chaiken, PC, Lee Brown, Eric Porterfield, Lee Brown, Th

491 F.Supp.2d 136 (2007) Donald C. HUTCHINS, Plaintiff v. CARDIAC SCIENCE, INC., Defendant. C.A. No. 04-30126-MAP. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. June 1, 2007. *137 Eric H. Chadwick, Randall T. Skaar, Scott G. Uhbrich, Patterson, Thuente, Skaar & Christensen, P.A. Minneapolis, MN, William E. Coughlin, Colleen

456 F.Supp.2d 196 (2006) Donald C. HUTCHINS, Plaintiff v. CARDIAC SCIENCE, INC., et al., Defendants. C.A. No. 04-30126-MAP. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 29, 2006. Donald C. Hutchins, Longmeadow, MA, pro se. Paul H. Rothschild, Bacon & Wilson, P.C., Springfield, MA, Randall T. Skaar, *197 Sc

415 F.Supp.2d 1007 (2006) NATUROPATHIC LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff, v. DERMAL RESEARCH LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant. No. 02-0604-CV-W-GAF. United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Western Division. February 13, 2006. Anthony A. Coppola, Jeffrey A. Schwab, Anthony J. Difilippi, Michael Aschen, Abelman, Frayne & Schwab, New York City, Brian Ri

428 F.Supp.2d 1014 (2006) In re: GUIDANT CORP. IMPLANTABLE DEFIBRILLATORS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION This Document Relates to: Peter Wislocki, as trustee of the Spouse and next of kin of Louis Wislocki, decedent, Plaintiff, v. Guidant Corporation and Guidant Sales Corporation Defendants; Patricia Machalowski, individually and as Trustee for the next of kin of John Machalowski, Plaintiff, v. Guidant Corporation; Cardiac Pacemake

TROTT, Circuit Judge, Dissenting. To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves is sinful and tyrannical.1 *1143Thomas Jefferson The atmospheric challenge in this case, which is one we often face, is to focus not on the overwh