Cases

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 3rd day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 3rd day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 3rd day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

366 F.Supp.2d 104 (2005) Linda RANDALL, Plaintiff, v. John E. POTTER, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant. No. CV-03-135-B-W. United States District Court, D. Maine. February 9, 2005. *105 *106 Arthur J. Greif, Gilbert & Greif, P.A., Bangor, Martha S. Temple, Temple

13-3792 Main Street Legal Services v. National Security In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit ________________

366 F.Supp.2d 120 (2005) Linda RANDALL, Plaintiff, v. John E. POTTER, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant. No. CV-03-135-B-W. United States District Court, D. Maine. February 9, 2005. *121 Arthur J. Greif, Gilbert & Greif, P.A., Bangor, ME, Martha S. Temple, Temple Law Offices, PA, Hampden, ME, Julie D

Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Court Judge This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. For the following reasons, the Motion is denied. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs D.M. and Z.G. challenge a Minnesota State High School League ("MSHSL") rule that dance team is a girls-only

ROBERTS, Justice. George E. and Sandra M. Randall, with Frank A. Russell, appeal from the judgment of the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Mead. J.) that established the location of the common boundary of their properties with the properly of Gary and Maria Quintal. Because the court relied on the Quintals’ surveyor, who misused the concept of latent ambiguity, as well as the doctrine that monuments contr

James Edward Welsh, Judge Eddie Randall and Donald Randall appeal the circuit court’s judgment in favor of Evelyn Randall (by Thomas Randall, personal representative of her Estate) setting aside a warranty deed executed by Eddie as Evelyn’s attorney in fact. 1 We affirm. Background

919 F.2d 290 Howard FINE, Oakhill South Corporation, Eugene Vanderford,Dr. Charles Yates, and John V. Yates, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.AMERICAN SOLAR KING CORP., et al., Defendants,Main Hurdman, Defendant-Appellee.James RANDALL, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Brian D. PARDO, et al., Defendants,Main Hurdman, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 89-1218, 89-1290. United States Court of Appea

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Dec 31 2019, 6:48 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court

NICHOLS, Justice. Jeffrey D. Randall, the Defendant, appeals from his conviction of unlawful sexual contact, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 255 (1983) and assault, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 207 (1983), following a jury trial in Superior Court (Aroostook County). He argues that the *269jury instructions unfairly emphasized the testimony of certain witnesses, thereby denying him a fair trial. A

262 Ga. 861 (1993) 426 S.E.2d 883 FISCH et al. v. RANDALL MILL CORPORATION. S92A1223. Supreme Court of Georgia. Decided March 15, 1993. Thomas P. Stamps, Dent Acree, Heidi Hughes, for appellants. Freeman & Hawkins, Howell Hollis III, Keenan G. Loomis, Theodore A. Speaker, Long, Aldridge & Norman, J. Allen Maines, Gree

ORDER Reed O’Connor, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Defendants American Airlines Inc., the Pension Asset Administration Committee, the Benefits Strategy Committee, the Pension Benefits Administration Committee, and the Employee Benefits Committee’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 37). The Motion has been fully briefed and is ripe for review. Having considered the pleadings, briefing, and applica

ALEXANDER, J. [¶ 1] Randall Daluz appeals from the trial court’s (Penobscot County, Anderson, J.) denial of his motion for a new trial following his conviction after a jury trial of three counts of. murder, 17-A M.R.S. § 201(1)(A) (2015), and one count of arson (Class A), 17-A M.R.S. § 802(1)(A) (2015). In his motion for a new trial, Daluz argued-that statement

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2024 ME 26 Docket: SRP-23-108 Argued: January 10, 2024 Decided: April 16, 2024 Panel: STANFILL, C.J., and MEAD, HORTON, CONNORS, LAWRENCE, and DOUGLAS, JJ. STATE OF MAINE v. RANDALL J. WEDDLE LAWRENCE, J. [¶1] Randall J. Weddle appea

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-2968 JOHNNIE MERTICE WESLEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. RANDALL HEPP, Respondent-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0011p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ LESLIE FISHER, │ Plainti

HAGEL, Judge: Webster D. Haney appeals through counsel a February 20, 2004, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) decision in which the Board (1) denied his claim to reopen a previously and finally disallowed claim for service connection for degenerative arthritis of the cervical spine, (2) denied his claim for service connection for charley horses (that is, muscle cramps) of the le

JABAR, J. [¶ 1] Randall G. Kelley appeals from a judgment of the District Court (Ellsworth, Mallonee, J.) determining that he was not a de facto parent of Jenna Gordius’s child. Because key factual findings are in conflict in the court’s findings, we must vacate the court’s decision and remand for further proceedings. I. BACKGROUND [¶ 2] The following facts are derived from th