Cases

Order PER CURIAM. Clinton Ramsey appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (“Insurer”). Ramsey filed a claim with Insurer when his property was damaged after water overflowed from a sump pump into his basement. The trial court concluded that Ramsey’s policy did not provide coverage for the damage. Having careful

[Cite as Ramsey v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 2016-Ohio-5871.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY TONYA RAMSEY, ADMINISTRATOR : : Plaintiff-Appellant : C.A. CASE NO. 27050 : v. : T.C. NO. 14CV6617 :

50 Cal.4th 913 (2010) 114 Cal. Rptr. 3d 280 237 P.3d 598 VILLAGE NORTHRIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent. No. S161008. Supreme Court of California. August 30, 2010. *917 Engstrom, Lipscomb & La

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER TOM S. LEE, District Judge. This court has pending before it two motions, a motion by plaintiff State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (State Farm) for summary judgment on the counterclaims of Willie B. Ramsey and Georgia Ramsey or alternatively for partial summary judgment dismissing their claims for punitive damages, and a motion for partial summary judgment by defendant To

82 S.W.3d 114 (2002) Roy L. NAST and Billie R. Nast, Appellants, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, State Farm Lloyds, and Daniel G. Clark, Appellees. No. 04-01-00237-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. May 1, 2002. Rehearing Overruled June 26, 2002. *118 Philip E. Hamner, San Antonio, for appellant

CARL E. STEWART, Circuit Judge: This case involves a dispute regarding the scope of coverage of a homeowner insurance policy. For the reasons assigned, we reverse the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the insurance provider. Factual and Procedural History The appellants, Dennis and Connie Gehl (the “Gehls”), sustained

2021 IL 126446 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 126446) JARRET SPROULL, Appellee, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant. Opinion filed September 23, 2021. JUSTICE

This is the second time this case has been before this Court. In Hunter v. State Farm Fire Casualty Co., 543 So.2d 679 (Ala. 1989), we reversed a summary judgment in favor of State Farm Fire Casualty Company and its agent and remanded the cause for a trial on the issue of whether the plaintiff had an insurable interest in the property at the time of the loss. The trial resulted in a judgment in favor of State Farm. Whether the plaintiff had

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of State Farm Fire and Casualty Company ("State Farm") and its agent, Bobby Baker, in an action by Ida Mae Hunter based on breach of contract and negligence. We reverse. Ida Mae Hunter and her husband, Howard K. Hunter, acquired their house in Fultondale, Alabama, by warranty deed in 1962. Mr. Hunter died in 1969. In 1970, Mrs. Hunter purchased a homeowner's insurance policy from State Farm through its agent Bobby Baker. This p

765 P.2d 882 (1988) Lisa MARAKIS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant and Appellee. No. 20855. Supreme Court of Utah. November 25, 1988. Wayne B. Watson, Beverley A. Ramsey, Provo, for plaintiff and appellant. Ray Phillips Ivie, Provo, for defendant and appellee. HALL, Chief Justice: Plaintiff Lisa Marakis

BERZON, dissenting, I respectfully dissent from the panel’s holding. I would certify unresolved questions of state law to the Aaska Supreme Court. See Alaska R.App. P. 407(a). The record makes clear that the reason State Farm refused to approve the settlement was the coverage dispute. State Farm presumably could have chosen instead to approve the settlement and reserve its rights b

Opinion issued August 26, 2025 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00572-CV ——————————— CARMEN ALEMAN, ERIC B. DICK, AND THE DICK LAW FIRM, PLLC, Appellants V. STAN

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Daniel D. Crabtree, United States District Judge Plaintiffs James Harlan and Carman Ange filed this breach of contract action on behalf of themselves, as the natural parents and heirs of Curtis Harlan, and as Special Administrators to the Estate of Curtis Harlan. Curtis Harlan’s former employer, R.A. Knapp Construction, Inc. (“R.A. Knapp”), maintained a Commercial General Liability Po

OPINION BERNICE BOUIE DONALD, Circuit Judge. In this case, Defendant-Appellee Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company (“Penn Mutual”) refused to pay death benefits to Plaintiff-Appellant Barbara Ramsey (“Plaintiff’) upon the death of her husband, John Ramsey (“Mr. Ramsey”). The district court concluded that Mr. Ramsey had failed to inform Penn Mutual of a cha

*584ELLIS, Judge. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company appeals from a declaratory judgment finding that its homeowner’s policy issued to Edwin and Nancy Hippo provided insurance coverage for personal injuries sustained by Harold Cronin when he was physically assaulted by the Hippos’ son, Frederick. On March 3,1994, Mr. Cronin was socializing with frie

STRAND, District Judge. This ease arises out of the untimely death of Adam Fetzer, a delivery driver for the Papa John’s restaurant chain who was killed in a car accident on April 28, 2012. Fetzer was driving during the course of his employment in Bismarck, North Da *958 kota, when another driver

MEMORANDUM ORDER FEINBERG, United States Magistrate Judge. Defendants State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“Defendants” or “State Farm”) have filed a Motion to Compel which presents important questions concerning Federal Civil Rule 26(a)(2)(B)’s requirements for disclosure of expert testimony. The parties have provided helpful memoran-da, sett

The no-opinion order of affirmance of January 18, 2008, is withdrawn, and the following is substituted therefor. Patrick S. Ramsey ("the father") and Carla R. Ramsey ("the mother") were married in May 1994. The father is an obstetrician and a professor of obstetrics; the mother was not employed at the time of the parties' separation on July 23, 2006. The parties lived in Birmingham from June 1998 until the date the parties separated. Two children were born of the marriage, one

526 N.W.2d 378 (1995) Frank GILMAN, et al., Creditors, Appellants (C1-94-888), Respondents (C5-94-943), and Brian Lawson, Debtor, v. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO., Garnishee, Respondent (C1-94-888), Appellant (C5-94-943). Nos. C1-94-888, C5-94-943. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. January 17, 1995. *379 John M. Riedy, McLe

510 N.W.2d 204 (1993) Douglas P. KRUEGER, Appellant, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, et al., Respondents. No. C1-93-928. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. December 28, 1993. *206 James R. Anderson, Marshall, for appellant. Tony R. Krall and Margaret K. Ackerman, Hanson Lulic & Krall, Minneapolis, for respondents.