Cases

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Sharon A.M. Aarons, J.), entered November 5, 2012, which, to the extent appealed from, granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, and denied defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Defendant contends that workers’ compensation benefits are plaintiffs exclusive remedy for the injuries he sustained when he was struck by the tr

LOHIER, Circuit Judge: Luis Ramon Morales-Santana asks us to review a March 3, 2011 decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his motion to reopen his removal proceedings relating to his claim of derivative citizenship. Under the statute in effect when Morales-Santana was born — the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (the “1952 Act”) — a child born abroad to an unwed citizen mother and non-citizen fat

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Sharon A.M. Aarons, J.), entered November 5, 2012, which, to the extent appealed from, granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, and denied defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Defendant contends that workers’ compensation benefits are plaintiffs exclusive remedy for the injuries he sustained when he was struck by the tr

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. This appeal challenges a substantial verdict against an abortion clinic for medical malpractice. The defendants ask us to vacate the jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, claiming that the court made a number of erroneous evidentiary rulings during the trial. After a careful review of the record, we affirm the verdict for the plaintiffs.

OPINION ROGERS, Circuit Judge. Ramon Amezola-Garcia, a Mexican citizen who was ordered removed for being present in the United States without having been admitted or paroled, appeals the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (“BIA’s”) denial of his applications for withholding of removal and voluntary departure. He primarily argues that the BIA erred by sending his case to a single-member panel for review rather

LOHIER, Circuit Judge: Luis Ramon Morales-Santana asks us to review a March 3, 2011 decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his motion to reopen his removal proceedings relating to his claim of deriva-five citizenship. Under the statute in effect when Morales-Santana was born — the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (the “1952 Act”) — a child born abroad to an unwed citizen mother and non-citizen fath

531 F.Supp.2d 1253 (2008) Ramon FISHER, Individually and as Father and Next Friend of Minor, K.F., Plaintiff, v. Landee LYNCH, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-2154-KHV. United States District Court, D. Kansas. January 22, 2008. *1254 *1255 *1256

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1079 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1119 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1092 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT

11-1252-ag Morales-Santana v. Lynch 1 2 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 3 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 4 5 August Term, 2012 6 7 (Argued: April 1, 2013 Final Submission: November 14, 2014 8 Decided: July 8, 2015 Amended: October 30, 2015) 9 10

Case: 13-60664 Document: 00513332687 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/06/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 13-60664 United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED ANH LE, Ja

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1120 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT

Case: 13-60664 Document: 00513337232 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/11/2016 REVISED January 11, 2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED

11-1252-ag Morales-Santana v. Lynch 1 2 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 3 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 4 5 August Term, 2012 6 7 (Argued: April 1, 2013 Final Submission: November 14, 2014 8 Decided: July 8, 2015) 9 10 Docket

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 16a0235p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ RAMON AMEZOLA-GARCIA, a.k.a. Jose Rivera- ┐ Camarena, │

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Determination confirmed. No opinion. McCarthy, J.P., Lynch, Clark, Mulvey and Aarons, JJ., concur.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this *993Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. After a correction officer gave a five-minute warning to a religious group that their one

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of the Superintendent of Shawan-gunk Correctional Facility finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with possessing contraband and possessin

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this *993Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. After a correction officer gave a five-minute warning to a religious group that their one