Cases

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas JUDGMENT No. 04-16-00796-CV James RAMIREZ, Appellant v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a The Bank of New York, as Successor in Interest to JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., a

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 20, 2017 No. 04-16-00796-CV James RAMIREZ, Appellant v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON fka The Bank of New York, As Successor in Interest to JP Morgan Chase B

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-16-00796-CV James RAMIREZ, Appellant v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a The Bank of New York, as Successor in In

Ramirez v Bank of N.Y. Mellon (2023 NY Slip Op 04606) Ramirez v Bank of N.Y. Mellon 2023 NY Slip Op 04606 Decided on September 13, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judic

HALL, Circuit Judge: Before us on appeal is a matter of first impression regarding the interpretation of § 201 of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 (codified at 28 U.S.C. § 1610 note) (“TRIA”) and §§ 1610(f)(1) and 1610(g) of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (“FSIA”) (codified at 28 U.S.C.). The petitioners are family members of victims of state sponsored terrorism.

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed October 31, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ Nos. 3D18-313 and 3D16-2064 Lower Tribunal No. 13-7494 ________________ The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee, etc.,

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE BARBARA M.G. LYNN, District Judge. After reviewing the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and conducting a de novo review of those parts of the Findings and Conclusions to which objections have been made, I am of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magist

FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS • SAN ANTONIO, TX 12:30 pm, Dec 14, 2016 E-FILED KEITH E. HOTTLE Bexar County, County Clerk CLERK OF THE COURT Gerard Rickhoff Accepted Date:

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, United States District Judge *309The Ad Hoc Group of General Obligation Bondholders (the "GO Group")2 has moved pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24, as made applicable to this proceeding by Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7024,3 for leave to intervene (the "Motion to Intervene

19-1774-cv Maddox v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon Tr. Co., N.A. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ____________________ August Term, 2019 (Argued: March 26, 2020 Decided: November 17, 2021) Docket No. 19-1774 ____________________ SANDRA MADDOX, TOMETTA MADDOX HOLLEY, on behalf of themselves and al

21-1333-cv Christina Rynasko v. New York University In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2021 No. 21-1333-cv CHRISTINA RYNASKO, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED

22-2178-cv New York v. Niagara-Wheatfield Central School District UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2023 (Argued: October 27, 2023 Decided: October 15, 2024) Docket No. 22-2178-cv PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, BY LETITIA JAMES, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR LUMINENT MORTGAGE TRUST 2007-2, Appellant, v. JULIO R. SANCHEZ a/k/a JULIO RAMIREZ SANCHEZ and GINA CARVALLO, Appellees. No. 4D17-1085 [April 25, 2018]

Ramirez v Issa (2026 NY Slip Op 00272) Ramirez v Issa 2026 NY Slip Op 00272 Decided on January 21, 2026 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and

ORDER WOLF, District Judge. The defendants in this case have moved for dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, or in the alternative for transfer. The plaintiff has moved for the substitution of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) as a party. Magistrate Alexander, after thorough review of the jurisdictional issues presented, recommended on December 2, 1991 that the case be dismissed

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Laporte (2025 NY Slip Op 01006) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Laporte 2025 NY Slip Op 01006 Decided on February 19, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to

ORDER: (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE; (2) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE; (S) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DAVID ALAN EZRA, Senior District Judge. On April 22, 2013, the Court heard oral argument on the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Bank of America, N.A. (“Bank of America”) (doc. *756

ACCEPTED 01-15-00373-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 8/10/2015 5:13:17

Bangladesh Bank v Rizal Commercial Banking Corp. (2024 NY Slip Op 01112) Bangladesh Bank v Rizal Commercial Banking Corp. 2024 NY Slip Op 01112 Decided on February 29, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department PITT-BURKE, J.

HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Kalenborn (2023 NY Slip Op 02109) HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Kalenborn 2023 NY Slip Op 02109 Decided on April 26, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judic