Cases

Filed 9/22/17 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA GUADALUPE FABIAN RAMIREZ, D072473 Petitioner, (Imperial County Super. Ct. No. JCF37805) v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF IMPERIAL COUNTY, Respondent; T

HALLER, Acting P. J. *647Guadalupe Fabian Ramirez petitions this court for a writ of mandate directing the superior court to vacate its order extraditing him to Arizona. Ramirez contends he is mentally incompetent and the court's order extraditing him violates his due process rights. Ramirez seeks placement in an appropriate mental health faci

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WILMER GARCIA RAMIREZ, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 18-508 (RC) : v. : : U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS

RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs-three immigrants teenagers who entered the United States as unaccompanied alien children-bring this putative class action against Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE"), the Acting Director of ICE, the Department of Homeland Security ("DHS"), and the Secretary of Homeland Security. They allege that upon reaching their r

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WILMER GARCIA RAMIREZ, et al., : : Plaintiffs. : Civil Action No.: 18-508 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 6, 36

USCA11 Case: 20-14044 Date Filed: 06/09/2022 Page: 1 of 53 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-14044 ____________________ BRANDI MCKAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, a Municipal Corp

USCA1 Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion for Qualified Immunity and Summary Judgment, filed June 7, 2016 (Doc. 34)(“MSJ”). The Court held a hearing on September 21, 2016. The primary issues are: (i) whether Defendants Rio Arri-ba County, Rio Arriba County Sheriffs Department, and Deputy Gilbert Atencio are ent

ACCEPTED 15-25-00102-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/24/2025 12:08 PM NO. 15-25-00102-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE CLERK

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 18-2112 ____________ MID-AMERICAN SALT, LLC, Appellant v. MORRIS COUNTY COOPERATIVE PRICING COUNCIL; CLINTON TOWNSHIP; FLEMINGTON BOROUGH; FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP (SOMERSET COUNTY); GLEN GARDNER BOROUGH; LEBANON TOWNSHIP; RARITAN TOWN

ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 4/2/2015 10

BELL V. VPSI, INC. ET AL. COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-04-352-CV LINDA C. BELL APPELLANT V.

</

UNSEALED MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant J.M. Sharkey’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment No. I: Dismissal of Plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment Illegal Seizure Claim (Count I) Based on Qualified Immunity, filed July 30, 2013 (Doc. 92) (“MSJ No. 1”). The Court held a hearing on Septemb

187 F.3d 30 (1st Cir. 1999) ROBERT E. SCHNEIDER, JR., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, APPELLEES,v.COLEGIO DE ABOGADOS DE PUERTO RICO DEFENDANT, APPELLANT.ROBERT E. SCHNEIDER, JR., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, APPELLEES,v.SECRETARIES OF JUSTICE AND TREASURY OF PUERTO RICO, DEFENDANTS, APPELLANTS.ROBERT E. SCHNEIDER, JR., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, APPELLEES,v.COLEGIO DE ABOGADOS DE PUERTO RICO, ET AL., DEFENDANT, APPELLANT.FUNDACION COLEGIO

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, United States Chief Magistrate Judge Plaintiffs Rafael Sandoval and Luis Ca-lixto allege, on behalf of themselves and a putative class, that Defendants failed to comply with the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 216, California labor law, and California u

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James 0. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Plaintiffs Motion and Memorandum in Support of Summary Judgment for Inhumane Conditions of Confinement, filed September 6, 2016 (Doc. 156)(“MSJ”); and (ii) the County Defendants’ Amended Motion for Partial Summary Judgment No. 1 — Dismissal of Plaintiffs Substantive Due Process Cl

PHILIP R. MARTINEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On this day, the Court considered Defendant City of El Paso's [hereinafter "Defendant"] "Rule 12 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint" (ECF No. 22) [hereinafter "Motion"], filed on June 29, 2017, Plaintiffs Celia Sanchez and Oscar Salas's [hereinafter collectively referred to as "Plaintiffs"] "Response to Defendant City of El Paso's 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss" (ECF No

THOMPSON, Associate Judge: This matter arose when plaintiffs/appel-lees, individuals who had been longtime congregants of Jericho Baptist Church Ministries, Inc. (also known as Jericho City of Praise) during its existence as a District of Columbia non-profit corporation (“Jericho D.C,”), sued a number of. individuals (the “individual appellants”) who (1) incorporated under Maryl

565 F.3d 892 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lester Jon RUSTON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-10433. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. April 15, 2009. *894 Delonia Anita Watson (argued), Fort Worth, TX, for U.S. Jason Douglas Hawkins (argued), Fed. Pub. Def., Dallas, TX, for Ruston. <