⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Ralph White”

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco) · 2025-02-27 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-23-00246-CR RALPH CHRISTOPHER WHITE, JR., Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 13th District Court Navarro County, Texas Trial Court No. D4151
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco) · 2000-03-01 · Published · cited 0×
Ralph White Jr. v. State of Texas  IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-99-234-CR
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2018-02-23 · Published · cited 0×
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Richard A. White, FILED Petitioner Below, Petitioner February 23, 2018 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK vs) No. 17-0071
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2005-03-17 · Published · cited 0×
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 17, 2005 Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 17, 2005. In The Four
Supreme Court of Virginia · 2006-01-13 · Published · cited 13× · 624 S.E.2d 5; 271 Va. 50; 2006 Va. LEXIS 15
624 S.E.2d 5 (2006) 271 Va. 50 Ralph WHITE, et al. v. BOUNDARY ASSOCIATION, INC. Record No. 050417. Supreme Court of Virginia. January 13, 2006. *6 Michael L. Heikes, Williamsburg (Laura W. Rugless; Heikes & Rugless, on briefs), for appellants. Christopher R. Papile (Kaufman & Canoles, on br
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009-02-10 · Published · cited 5× · 555 F.3d 510; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 2407; 2009 WL 305512
OPINION ROGERS, Circuit Judge. In this case, the bankruptcy court granted debtor Ralph Swegan’s summary judgment motion to discharge his debt to appellee Buckeye Retirement Co. The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) for the Sixth Circuit reversed and remanded for trial. Swegan seeks review of the BAP’s decision. Because this court lacks appellate jurisdiction
California Court of Appeal · 2016-02-05 · Published · cited 1× · 244 Cal. App. 4th 754; 198 Cal. Rptr. 3d 309; 2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 84
Opinion NICHOLSON, J. This appeal asks us to interpret a term limit provision found in the City of Stockton’s city charter. The voter-adopted provision, section 606 of article VI of the Stockton City Charter (hereafter section 606), reads in relevant part: “No person elected as either Mayor or Councilmember shall be eligible to serve, or serve, as either May
White v. Thompsonpublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2010-04-15 · Published · cited 100× · 691 S.E.2d 676; 364 N.C. 47; 2010 N.C. LEXIS 349
691 S.E.2d 676 (2010) Charles M. WHITE and Earl Ellis, individually and now or formerly d/b/a Ace Fabrication and Welding, a North Carolina general partnership v. Andrew THOMPSON, Douglas Thompson, and Fran Lurkee, alias. No. 226A09. Supreme Court of North Carolina. April 15, 2010. Lee & Lee, by Junius B. Lee, III, Whiteville, for plaintiff-appellants. Ra
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010-08-03 · Published · cited 5× · 699 S.E.2d 823; 305 Ga. App. 493; 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 2711; 2010 Ga. App. LEXIS 736
699 S.E.2d 823 (2010) 131 RALPH McGILL BOULEVARD, LLC, et al. v. FIRST INTERCONTINENTAL BANK. No. A10A1531. Court of Appeals of Georgia. August 3, 2010. *824 Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Martin, Gary S. Freed, Fletcher B. Howard, for Appellants. Morgan & Chakales, Robert T. Morgan, Freisem, Macon, Swann
White v. Thompsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009-05-05 · Published · cited 10× · 676 S.E.2d 104; 196 N.C. App. 568; 2009 N.C. App. LEXIS 530
676 S.E.2d 104 (2009) Charles M. WHITE and Earl Ellis, individually and now or formerly d/b/a Ace Fabrication and Welding, a North Carolina General Partnership, Plaintiffs v. Andrew THOMPSON, Douglas Thompson, and Fran Lurkee, alias, Defendants. No. COA08-953. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. May 5, 2009. *106 Lee & Lee, A
People v. Whitepublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009-07-31 · Published · cited 5× · 917 N.E.2d 1018; 334 Ill. Dec. 943; 395 Ill. App. 3d 797; 2009 Ill. App. LEXIS 734
917 N.E.2d 1018 (2009) 334 Ill.Dec. 943 The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Kenyatta WHITE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-06-1034. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Sixth Division. July 31, 2009. Rehearing Denied December 1, 2009. *1020 Anita Alvarez, State's
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2019-05-10 · Published · cited 0× · 389 F. Supp. 3d 1096
PATRICIA A. SEITZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER is before the Court on Movant Ralph Curry's Motion for Relief from Mandate [DE 36], the Government's Response [DE 38], and the parties' supplemental briefing [DE 42; DE 43]. Citing the Eleventh Circuit's recent published opinion in United States v. Pickett , 916 F.3d 960
White v. Farabeepublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011-05-17 · Published · cited 2× · 713 S.E.2d 4; 212 N.C. App. 126; 2011 N.C. App. LEXIS 960
713 S.E.2d 4 (2011) Philippe WHITE, and Wife, Elizabeth S. White, Petitioners, v. Robert Leroy FARABEE, Unmarried; Richard Eugene Rasberry, and Spouse, if any; Hosea R. Rasberry, Unmarried; Charles Albert Isley, Jr., and Spouse, if any; Ernest Lemell Isley, and Spouse, if any; William Cecil Douglas Isley, and Wife, Cecelia Isley; Ralph Malcolm Pollard, Unmarried; Edwina M. Deloney, Unmarried; Frederick A. Smith, and Wife, Bertha M. Smith; Patrici
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) · 2004-01-08 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-03-390 CV ____________________
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007-11-30 · Published · cited 1× · 2007 Ohio 6335
DECISION. *Page 2 {¶ 1} On June 22, 2000, defendant-appellant Chester White pleaded guilty to one count of rape and one count of kidnapping in exchange for the dismissal of three counts of rape and two counts of kidnapping. White agreed to a sentence of seven years' incarceration, and he was found to be a sexual predator. At the sentencing hearing, the trial court informed Whi
White v. Crow Ghostpublic domain
District Court, D. North Dakota · 2006-10-11 · Published · cited 1× · 456 F. Supp. 2d 1096; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74500; 2006 WL 2927846
456 F.Supp.2d 1096 (2006) Richard WHITE, Plaintiff, v. Michael CROW GHOST, Ben Half, Gary Sandland, Douglas Wilkinson, and Mike Yellow, Defendants. No. 1:05-cv-42. United States District Court, D. North Dakota, Southwestern Division. October 11, 2006. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HOVLAND, Chief Judge. Before the Cour
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999-06-04 · Published · cited 39× · 180 F.3d 372; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 11373; 1999 WL 377763
180 F.3d 372, In re Grand Jury Witness Ralph ALTRO.United States of America, Appellee,v.Ralph Altro, Appellant. Docket No. 98-6165. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. Argued May 3, 1999.Decided June 04, 1999. Colleen P. Cassidy, The Legal Aid Society, New York, New York, for Appellant.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2025-07-10 · Published · cited 0×
SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT COMMONWEALTH vs. RALPH BROWN Docket: SJC-13487 Dates: March 7, 2025 - July 10, 2025 Present: Budd
White v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000-06-13 · Published · cited 3× · 536 S.E.2d 180; 244 Ga. App. 475; 2000 Fulton County D. Rep. 2766; 2000 Ga. App. LEXIS 741
536 S.E.2d 180 (2000) 244 Ga. App. 475 WHITE v. The STATE. No. A00A0426. Court of Appeals of Georgia. June 13, 2000. Ralph J. Hunstein, Monroe, for appellant. J. Tom Morgan, District Attorney, Barbara B. Conroy, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee. MILLER, Judge. A jury found Brian Charles White guilty of one count
White v. Whitepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995-08-16 · Published · cited 0× · 658 So. 2d 681; 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8679; 1995 WL 481106
WOLF, JAMES R., Associate Judge. Appellant, former wife, challenges an order entered upon both parties’ requests for modification of alimony and child support. Appellant alleges that the trial court erred when it found her alimony would be “treated as rehabilitative in nature.” We find the trial court did in fact err since there was no request in the pleadings to convert the alimony from permanent to rehabilitative, the issue was n