Cases

Pfeifer, J. {¶ 1} In this case, we identify the mens rea requirement of R.C. 2907.05(A)(4), which sets forth the elements of gross sexual imposition involving victims under the age of 13. We hold that the statute establishes strict liability as to the defendant’s knowledge of the age of the victim and a mens rea of purpose in regard

483 S.E.2d 614 (1997) 225 Ga. App. 157 MARTIN v. PATTON. No. A97A0474. Court of Appeals of Georgia. February 19, 1997. Reconsideration Denied March 5, 1997. *617 Newton & Howell, John T. Newton, Jr., Griffin, for appellant. Howard P. Wallace, Griffin, for appellee.

OPINION [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 901 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 902 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE T

HIGGINS, District Judge. This case involves an appeal by Ralph Hubert Barger from his jury conviction for conspiracy to violate federal explosives, firearms and arson laws and to convert a thing of value of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and for knowingly converting a copy of the official law enforcement intelligence manual regarding the identities and persona

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ECONOMUS, District Judge. This matter is before the Court upon the Motion of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation for a Protective Order. (Dkt.# 42.) I. On June 14, 2002, the Plaintiff, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”), filed its Complaint (Dkt.# 1) alleging claims pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), as amen

689 F.2d 365 Gregory MARTIN, Luis Rosario, Kenneth Morgan, and all otherssimilarly situated, Petitioners-Appellees,v.Paul STRASBURG, as Commissioner of the New York CityDepartment of Juvenile Justice, Respondent-Appellant,Robert Abrams, as Attorney General of the State of New York,Intervenor-Appellant. Nos. 526, 706, Dockets 81-2175, 81-2193. United States Court of Appeals,<

287 F.Supp.2d 815 (2003) PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION Plaintiff v. REPUBLIC TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, LLC., et al. Defendants No. 5:02 CV 01116. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. September 30, 2003. Lawrence J. Baer, Martin J. Bienenstock, Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP, New York, NY, Sean D. Malloy, Tyler L. Mathews, Shawn M. Ril

249 F.Supp.2d 98 (2003) WESTFIELD HIGH SCHOOL L.I.F.E. CLUB, Stephen Grabowski, by and through his parents, Edmund and Mary Etta Grabowski, Timothy Souza and Daniel Souza, by and through their parents, Ralph and Diane Souza, Sharon Sitler and Paul Sitler, by and through their parents, William and Denise Sitler, and Dustin Cooper, by and through his parents Brian and Amy Turner-Cooper, Plaintiffs v. CITY OF WESTFIELD, Thomas Y. McDowell, Individua

908 F.Supp. 697 (1995) Robert REICH, Plaintiff, v. CONSTRUCTION LABORERS LOCAL NO. 1140, et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. Duane MARTIN, et al., Third-Party Defendants. The OMAHA CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PENSION AND WELFARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION OF the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Defendant. Nos. 8:CV91-00280, 8:CV90-00602. U

20-1212 (L) In Re: 650 Fifth Avenue Company & Related Properties UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2020 (Argued: October 5, 2020 and February 2, 2021 Decided: March 9, 2021) Docket No. 20-1212(L), 20-1265(XAP) IN RE: 650 FIFTH AVENUE COMPANY AND RELATED PROPERTI

Opinion McINTYRE, J. Government Code section 831.7 provides that, unless a specified exception applies, public entities are immune from liability to persons who suffer injury while engaging in “hazardous recreational activities].” (Undesignated statutory references are to the Government Code.) In this case, we conclude the trial court improperly denied a publi

Per curiam. .. The appellants instituted an action in Fulton County Superior Court against the Fulton County Board of Registration and Elections, the officers of that board, the attorney for the City of Atlanta, the deputy clerk of council and acting clerk of council of the City of Atlanta, and a candidate for the office of mayor of the City of Atlanta seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. Specifically, the plaintiffs sou

517 F.Supp.2d 764 (2007) Christopher ODOM, Plaintiff, v. Jon OZMINT, Director; Mary Brown, Clerk; Kerrie Specht, Parole Officer; Ralph Hunter, D.H.O.; Mr. Steven, Case Worker; Mrs. Laverette; Mr. Hallman; and S.C.D.C. Insurance Policy Holder, Defendants. C.A. No. 3:07-00343-PMD-JRM. United States District Court, D. South Carolina. July 6, 2007.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 127 This is an impeachment proceeding originally commenced in this Court by the filing of an information by E. E. Mullis and four other individuals in their own behalf and in the name of the State of Alabama on their relation, wherein they aver in twenty-four specifications that the respondent, H. Ralph Mathews,

CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judge. R.K. Matthews Investment, Inc. (“RKMI”) appeals from a judgment entered following a bench trial. The judgment found in favor of Beulah Mae Housing, LLC (“BMH”) on RKMI’s claims for breach of contract and enforcement of mechanic’s lien and for relief under the Missouri Prompt Pay Act.1 We affirm. Factual and Procedural Background Vi

OPINION OF THE COURT LAYTON, Senior District Judge: Appellants were convicted of mail fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1341.1 The primary issue raised by each defendant in this consolidated appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence adduced at their joint trial to sustain the jury’s verdicts against them. Because we conclude that there was not, we reverse. Appe

748 N.E.2d 396 (2001) In the Matter of the Change to the Established Water Level of LAKE OF THE WOODS, in Marshall County, Indiana, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. Calvin RALSTON, Donald Andrews and Richard Bean, Appellees-Respondents. No. 50A04-0009-CV-390. Court of Appeals of Indiana. May 3, 2001. *398 Martin R. Lucas, North Judson, IN

989 So.2d 652 (2007) Dennis R. DeLOACH, Jr., and Peter T. Hofstra, Petitioners, v. Hugh AIRD, Bob (G.W.R.) Anderson, Ian Anderson, Anne Marie Anderson, Armand Archambault, Beverly Armitage, Earnest Armitage, Elias Attar, Jossee Attar, Barbara Bell, Bernice Belliveau, Gail Beron, Kenneth Blanchette, Lucille Blakenship, Harry Blinkhorn, Elizabeth Blinkhorn, John Boitos, Robert Bowman, Terri Brothers, Franklin Wannemacher, Lise Brunet, James Burgess

MARTIN, Judge. This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority of invention to the senior party, Sohn et al., in Interference No. 88,770. The interference involves application serial No. 204,722, filed January 6, 1951, by Sohn et al., and an application, serial No. 286,348, fil

OPINION OF THE COURT BY JUSTICE ABRAMSON Death-row inmates Robert Foley and Ralph Baze appeal from an Order of the Franklin Circuit Court dismissing their Kentucky Revised Statute (KRS) 418.040 complaint for a declaratory judgment to the effect that “the Kentucky procedures outlining the submission and review of a petition for executive clemency [are] constitutionally inadequate.” Appellants sought an order re